Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회지)

Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Work Domain Analysis for Search and Rescue Helicopter

탐색구조 회전익 항공기의 작업영역 분석

  • Kim, Hyungi (Korea University, Division of Industrial Management Engineering) ;
  • Myung, Rohae (Korea University, Division of Industrial Management Engineering)
  • 김현기 (고려대학교 산업경영공학부) ;
  • 명노해 (고려대학교 산업경영공학부)
  • Received : 2017.10.06
  • Accepted : 2017.11.15
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the work domain and to extract the information requirements based on work domain analysis for ecological interface design of search and rescue helicopter. Background: Due to Flight at low altitude and many take-off and landings, helicopter's maneuvering have a high probability of human errors. In particular, search and rescue mission requires an effective interface because of helicopter's flight in urgent and risky environments. To cope with unanticipated events in the helicopter's maneuvering environment, work domain analysis has been used to introduce an effective design method, ecological interface design. Method: With the pilot operating on the search and rescue helicopter, (1) Work domain model was created by performing work domain analysis through abstraction hierarchy and part-whole hierarchy of search and rescue helicopter, (2) then the scenario mapping test was performed to evaluate the work domain model. Results: The Information requirements for ecological interface design of search and rescue helicopter was extracted in work domain model. Conclusion: In this study, the constraints and information requirements in the search and rescue helicopter were obtained through the work domain analysis of search and rescue helicopter, and it expand to the area of ecological interface design for helicopter. Application: The results of this study can improve the interface of search and rescue helicopter currently in use and help to ensure safe flight.

Keywords

References

  1. Baberg, T.W., Man-machine-interface in modern transport systems from an aviation safety perspective, Aerospace Science and Technology, 5(8), 495-504, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1270-9638(01)01126-9
  2. Borst, C., Flach, J.M. and Ellerbroek, J., Beyond ecological interface design: Lessons from concerns and misconception, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(2), 164-175, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2364984
  3. Burns, C.M., Bryant, D.J. and Chalmers, B.A., "Scenario mapping with work domain analysis", In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45 (No. 4, pp. 424-428), Los Angeles, CA, 2001.
  4. Burns, C.M., Bryant, D.J. and Chalmers, B.A., Boundary, purpose, and values in work-domain models: Models of naval command and control, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 35(5), 603-616, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.851153
  5. Burns, C.M. and Hajdukiewicz, J., Ecological Interface Design, CRC Press, 2004.
  6. Burns, C.M., Kuo, J. and Ng, S., Ecological interface design: a new approach for visualizing network management, Computer Networks, 43(3), 369-388, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(03)00287-1
  7. Burns, C.M., Skraaning Jr, G., Jamieson, G.A., Lau, N., Kwok, J., Welch, R. and Andresen, G., Evaluation of ecological interface design for nuclear process control: situation awareness effects, Human Factors, 50(4), 663-679, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X312305
  8. Choi, S., Choi, Y. and Lee, Y., A Study on the Situation Awareness of Helicopter Pilots, Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, 15(1), 54-60, 2007.
  9. Drivalou, S. and Marmaras, N., Supporting skill-, rule-, and knowledge-based behaviour through an ecological interface: An industry-scale application, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(6), 947-965, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.08.012
  10. Edkins, G.D., A review of the benefits of aviation human factors training, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 2(3), 201-216, 2002.
  11. Helmreich, R.L., Merritt, A.C. and Wilhelm, J.A., The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), 19-32, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2
  12. Jenkins, D.P., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H. and Young, M.S., Using cognitive work analysis to explore activity allocation within military domains, Ergonomics, 51(6), 798-815, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130801915246
  13. Jo, S., Myung, R. and Yoon, D., Quantitative prediction of mental workload with the ACT-R cognitive architecture, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(4), 359-370, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2012.03.004
  14. Ko, S.M. and Myung, R.H., Ecological Interface Design for Air Traffic Control Display, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 25(4), 103-113, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2006.25.4.103
  15. Lee, S.W., Lee, B.G., Back, J.S., Jo, S.S. and Myung, R.H., Applying Work Domain Analysis for Ecological Interface Design of Safety Monitoring System in the Urban Railway Station, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 13(3), 264-270, 2010.
  16. McFadden, K.L. and Towell, E.R., Aviation human factors: a framework for the new millennium, Journal of Air Transport Management, 5(4), 177-184, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(99)00011-3
  17. McIlroy, R.C. and Stanton, N.A., Getting past first base: Going all the way with Cognitive Work Analysis, Applied Ergonomics, 42(2), 358-370, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.006
  18. McIlroy, R.C. and Stanton, N.A., Ecological interface design two decades on: Whatever happened to the SRK taxonomy?, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(2), 145-163, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2369372
  19. Park, Y.H. and Myung, R.H., A Study on Ecological Interface Design for Navy Ship's Radar Display, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 31(2), 353-362, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2012.31.2.353
  20. Rasmussen, J., Ecological interface design for reliable human-machine systems, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(3), 203-223, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0903_2
  21. Rasmussen, J. and Vicente, K.J., Coping with human errors through system design: implications for ecological interface design, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31(5), 517-534, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(89)90014-X
  22. Shappell, S., Detwiler, C., Holcomb, K., Hackworth, C., Boquet, A. and Wiegmann, D.A., Human error and commercial aviation accidents: an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system, Human Factors, 49(2), 227-242, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X312469
  23. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P., Harris, D., Marshall, A., Demagalski, J., Young, M.S., Waldmann, T. and Dekker, S., Predicting pilot error: testing a new methodology and a multi-methods and analysts approach, Applied Ergonomics, 40(3), 464-471, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.10.005
  24. Taneja, N., "Human factors in aircraft accidents: a holistic approach to intervention strategies", In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46 (No. 1, pp. 160-164), Los Angeles, CA, 2002.
  25. Vicente, K.J., Ecological interface design: Progress and challenges, The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(1), 62-78, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720024494829
  26. Vicente, K.J. and Rasmussen, J., Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(4), 589-606, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.156574