Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2017.36.6.705

Work Domain Analysis for Search and Rescue Helicopter  

Kim, Hyungi (Korea University, Division of Industrial Management Engineering)
Myung, Rohae (Korea University, Division of Industrial Management Engineering)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.36, no.6, 2017 , pp. 705-716 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the work domain and to extract the information requirements based on work domain analysis for ecological interface design of search and rescue helicopter. Background: Due to Flight at low altitude and many take-off and landings, helicopter's maneuvering have a high probability of human errors. In particular, search and rescue mission requires an effective interface because of helicopter's flight in urgent and risky environments. To cope with unanticipated events in the helicopter's maneuvering environment, work domain analysis has been used to introduce an effective design method, ecological interface design. Method: With the pilot operating on the search and rescue helicopter, (1) Work domain model was created by performing work domain analysis through abstraction hierarchy and part-whole hierarchy of search and rescue helicopter, (2) then the scenario mapping test was performed to evaluate the work domain model. Results: The Information requirements for ecological interface design of search and rescue helicopter was extracted in work domain model. Conclusion: In this study, the constraints and information requirements in the search and rescue helicopter were obtained through the work domain analysis of search and rescue helicopter, and it expand to the area of ecological interface design for helicopter. Application: The results of this study can improve the interface of search and rescue helicopter currently in use and help to ensure safe flight.
Keywords
Ecological Interface Design (EID); Work Domain Analysis (WDA); Abstraction Hierarchy (AH); Search and rescue; Helicopter;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Baberg, T.W., Man-machine-interface in modern transport systems from an aviation safety perspective, Aerospace Science and Technology, 5(8), 495-504, 2001.   DOI
2 Borst, C., Flach, J.M. and Ellerbroek, J., Beyond ecological interface design: Lessons from concerns and misconception, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(2), 164-175, 2015.   DOI
3 Burns, C.M., Bryant, D.J. and Chalmers, B.A., "Scenario mapping with work domain analysis", In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45 (No. 4, pp. 424-428), Los Angeles, CA, 2001.
4 Burns, C.M., Bryant, D.J. and Chalmers, B.A., Boundary, purpose, and values in work-domain models: Models of naval command and control, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 35(5), 603-616, 2005.   DOI
5 Burns, C.M. and Hajdukiewicz, J., Ecological Interface Design, CRC Press, 2004.
6 Burns, C.M., Kuo, J. and Ng, S., Ecological interface design: a new approach for visualizing network management, Computer Networks, 43(3), 369-388, 2003.   DOI
7 Burns, C.M., Skraaning Jr, G., Jamieson, G.A., Lau, N., Kwok, J., Welch, R. and Andresen, G., Evaluation of ecological interface design for nuclear process control: situation awareness effects, Human Factors, 50(4), 663-679, 2008.   DOI
8 Choi, S., Choi, Y. and Lee, Y., A Study on the Situation Awareness of Helicopter Pilots, Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, 15(1), 54-60, 2007.
9 Edkins, G.D., A review of the benefits of aviation human factors training, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 2(3), 201-216, 2002.
10 Drivalou, S. and Marmaras, N., Supporting skill-, rule-, and knowledge-based behaviour through an ecological interface: An industry-scale application, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(6), 947-965, 2009.   DOI
11 Helmreich, R.L., Merritt, A.C. and Wilhelm, J.A., The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), 19-32, 1999.   DOI
12 Jenkins, D.P., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H. and Young, M.S., Using cognitive work analysis to explore activity allocation within military domains, Ergonomics, 51(6), 798-815, 2008.   DOI
13 Jo, S., Myung, R. and Yoon, D., Quantitative prediction of mental workload with the ACT-R cognitive architecture, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(4), 359-370, 2012.   DOI
14 Ko, S.M. and Myung, R.H., Ecological Interface Design for Air Traffic Control Display, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 25(4), 103-113, 2006.   DOI
15 Lee, S.W., Lee, B.G., Back, J.S., Jo, S.S. and Myung, R.H., Applying Work Domain Analysis for Ecological Interface Design of Safety Monitoring System in the Urban Railway Station, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 13(3), 264-270, 2010.
16 McFadden, K.L. and Towell, E.R., Aviation human factors: a framework for the new millennium, Journal of Air Transport Management, 5(4), 177-184, 1999.   DOI
17 McIlroy, R.C. and Stanton, N.A., Getting past first base: Going all the way with Cognitive Work Analysis, Applied Ergonomics, 42(2), 358-370, 2011.   DOI
18 Rasmussen, J., Ecological interface design for reliable human-machine systems, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(3), 203-223, 1999.   DOI
19 McIlroy, R.C. and Stanton, N.A., Ecological interface design two decades on: Whatever happened to the SRK taxonomy?, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(2), 145-163, 2015.   DOI
20 Park, Y.H. and Myung, R.H., A Study on Ecological Interface Design for Navy Ship's Radar Display, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 31(2), 353-362, 2012.   DOI
21 Rasmussen, J. and Vicente, K.J., Coping with human errors through system design: implications for ecological interface design, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31(5), 517-534, 1989.   DOI
22 Shappell, S., Detwiler, C., Holcomb, K., Hackworth, C., Boquet, A. and Wiegmann, D.A., Human error and commercial aviation accidents: an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system, Human Factors, 49(2), 227-242, 2007.   DOI
23 Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P., Harris, D., Marshall, A., Demagalski, J., Young, M.S., Waldmann, T. and Dekker, S., Predicting pilot error: testing a new methodology and a multi-methods and analysts approach, Applied Ergonomics, 40(3), 464-471, 2009.   DOI
24 Taneja, N., "Human factors in aircraft accidents: a holistic approach to intervention strategies", In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46 (No. 1, pp. 160-164), Los Angeles, CA, 2002.
25 Vicente, K.J., Ecological interface design: Progress and challenges, The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(1), 62-78, 2002.   DOI
26 Vicente, K.J. and Rasmussen, J., Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(4), 589-606, 1992.   DOI