DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Phenomenological Study on Students' Experiences of Flipped Learning-Based Class of Sensory Integration Therapy

대학생의 플립드 러닝 기반 감각통합치료 수업 경험에 관한 현상학적 연구

  • Lee, Nahael (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kosin University) ;
  • Jung, Hyerim (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kaya University)
  • 이나핼 (고신대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 정혜림 (가야대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2017.11.06
  • Accepted : 2017.12.15
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study is to investigate the meaning of students' experience participating in the flipped learning based instruction in sensory integration, and to understand the demand and introspection of participants. Methods : This study used a phenomenological approach of qualitative study. The participants were 10 students in 3rd year of the occupational therapy program in K Univeristy. Data information was collected by one-to-one interview and analyzed through phenomenological research method. Results : Through the interview, 20 units of meaning, 8 central meanings, and 3 themes were drew. The information collected were analyzed into three themes; Learning Experiences in Online and Offline Courses, Request and Introspection of Learners on Flipped Learning. The result showed that online courses brought learners convenience and satisfaction with repeatable learning in every time and space the learner want. However, the learners appealed issues of communication and concentration due to the absence of face-to-face instruction by their instructor. For the offline courses, students showed interest in various practical classwork of sensory integration and changes in their attitude to actively engage in the practical classes. Conclusion : Flipped learning based instruction was effective for the sensory integration classes which require practice in terms of time securement and immersion in practice. The learners requested for adopting flipped learning based instruction to other subjects in occupational therapy curriculum, and introspected that they needed to actively engage in classes through the experience of flipped learning-based classes of sensory integration. The results of this study can be used as a basic resource when flipped learning classes are planned in occupational therapy education.

목적 : 플립드 러닝기반 감각통합치료 수업을 받은 작업치료 대학생의 경험의 의미를 파악하고 수업 후 학습자의 요구와 성찰을 알아보는 것이다. 연구방법 : 대학생의 플립드 러닝 기반 감각통합치료 수업 경험에 관한 질적 연구 중 현상학적 연구방법을 사용하였다. 본 연구의 대상자는 2017년 1학기 K대학교 작업치료학과 전공필수과목인 '감각통합치료 및 실습'을 수강한 3학년 학생 중 10명이다. 자료 수집을 위해 일대일 면담방법을 이용하였고, 녹음한 면담내용을 전사하여 분석하였다. 결과 : 의미단위 20개, 중심의미 8개, 주제 3개가 도출되었다. 연구결과는 온라인 수업에서의 학습경험, 오프라인 수업에서의 학습경험, 플립드 러닝에 대한 학습자의 요구와 성찰의 주제로 분석하였다. 온라인 수업은 원하는 시간과 공간에서 학습할 수 있다는 편리함과 반복학습의 만족감을 가져왔다. 하지만 교수와의 면대면 수업의 부재로 소통과 집중력의 문제를 호소하였다. 오프라인 수업에서는 다양한 감각통합 실습수업에 흥미를 보였고, 적극적인 실습태도의 변화가 있었다. 결론 : 실습이 요구되는 감각통합 수업에 플립드 러닝 기반 수업은 시간의 확보와 실습 몰입 면에서 효과가 있었다. 다른 작업치료교과목도 플립드 러닝으로 수업하고 싶다는 요구가 있었으며, 플립드 러닝 수업을 통해 능동적인 학습 자세가 필요하다는 성찰이 있었다. 본 연구의 결과는 작업치료 교육 분야에서 플립드 러닝 수업을 시도하는데 기초자료로 제공하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bai, D. Y. (2015). A case study of the flipped learning classes at the university. Urimal, 41, 179-202.
  2. Burke, J. P., & Harvison, N. (2014). From the desk of the guest editors-a systematic focus on occupational therapy education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, S1-S2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.685S07
  3. Choi, J. E. (2015). The effect of the flipped learning in the science class on the science achievement and class participation of middle school students. Master's thesis, Soongsil University, Seoul.
  4. Cohn, E. S., Coster, W., & Kramer, J. M. (2014). Facilitated learning model to teach habits of evidence-based reasoning across an integrated master of science in occupational therapy curriculum. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(2), 73-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ ajot.2014.685S05.
  5. Corbett, A. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00094.x
  6. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
  7. Dulffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 170-198). NY: Scholastic.
  8. Giorgi, A. (2002). The question of validity in qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916202320900392
  9. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Ham, Y. J. (2015). A bible teaching model development utilizing the flipped learning. Korea Reformed Journal, 34, 241-267.
  11. Han, H. J., Lim, C. I., Han, S. L., & Park, J. W. (2015). Instructional strategies for integrating online and offline modes of flipped learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.31.1.001
  12. Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.
  13. Im, S. H., Kang, S. M., Lee, S. W., & You, Y. M. (2016). A qualitative case study of flipped learning class on college students. Journal of Educational Information and Media, 22(4), 777-803.
  14. Kim B. K. (2014). Development of flipped classroom model for teaching profession course. Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 25-56.
  15. Kim, J. A., Heo, H. J., & Lee, H. H. (2015). Effectiveness of flipped learning in project management class. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 9(2), 41-46.
  16. Kim, K. M., Ji, S. Y., Kang, E. A., Kim, M. S., Namgung, Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2005). The change of sensory integration education program in Korea and Japan. Journal Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 3(1), 79-84.
  17. Kim, K. M., Ji, S. Y., & Noh, J. S. (2003). Sensory integration Q & A. Seoul: Jeong Dam Pub.
  18. Kim, N. I., Chun, B. A., & Choi, J. I. (2014). A case study of flipped learning at college: Focused on effects of motivation and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 467-492. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.30.3.467
  19. Kim, Y. S. (2015). The effect of the flipped class on the affective experience learning achievement and class satisfaction of college. English language learners. Foreign Languages Education, 22(1), 227-254.
  20. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566
  21. Lee, D. Y. (2013). Research on developing instructional design models for flipped learning. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(12), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.12.83
  22. Lee, H. G. (2015). The effects of English teachinglearning on learners' English improvement and affective factors through flipped learning in a university ESP class. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 20(3), 73-99.
  23. Lee, J. Y., Kim, Y. H., & Kim, Y. B. (2014). A study on application of learner-centered flipped learning model. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 163-191. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.30.2.163
  24. Lee, S. H. (2015). Teaching of Korean grammar using flipped learning focus on the Korean grammar class as a liberal arts subject. Language and Culture, 11(2), 221-262.
  25. Lim, J. H. (2016). Teaching and learning strategies for flipped learning in higher education: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 165-199. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.1.165
  26. Lim, J. W. (2015). A study of flipped instructional model and application for pre-service teachers of english. English Language & Literature Teaching, 21(2), 157-173.
  27. Nederveld, A., & Berge, Z. L. (2015). Flipped learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(2), 162-172. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jwl- 06-2014-0044
  28. Park, S. H., & Lee, M. Y. (2017). A study on the satisfaction of flipped learning with pre-class using video in basic medical subjects. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 11(2), 261-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2017.02.11.2.261
  29. Park, S. Y. (2003). Problem based learning: An option in occupational therapy. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 11(1), 99-109.
  30. Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
  31. Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142-152.
  32. So, M. S. (2015). Flipped learning im deutschen grammatikunterricht. Koreanische Zeitschriftfur Deutschun Terricht, 63(1), 7-27.
  33. Suh, M. O. (2016a). The effect and awareness of the flipped classroom approach through mixed methods. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 535-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.17232/KSET. 32.3.535
  34. Suh, M. O. (2016b). The meta analysis of the effectiveness of flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 707-741. http:// dx.doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.4.707
  35. Um, S. W. (2016). A study on the model of university writing course using flipped learning. Korean College Composition and Communication, 15, 73-97.