DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Peanut Cultivars and Environmental Conditions on the Diversity and Community Composition of Pod Rot Soil Fungi in China

  • Wang, Mian (State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University) ;
  • Chen, Mingna (Shandong Peanut Research Institute) ;
  • Yang, Zhen (Shandong Peanut Research Institute) ;
  • Chen, Na (Shandong Peanut Research Institute) ;
  • Chi, Xiaoyuan (Shandong Peanut Research Institute) ;
  • Pan, Lijuan (Shandong Peanut Research Institute) ;
  • Wang, Tong (Shandong Peanut Research Institute) ;
  • Yu, Shanlin (Shandong Peanut Research Institute) ;
  • Guo, Xingqi (State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2017.10.10
  • Accepted : 2017.12.18
  • Published : 2017.12.01

Abstract

Peanut yield and quality are seriously affected by pod rot pathogens worldwide, especially in China in recent years. The goals of this study are to analyze the structure of fungal communities of peanut pod rot in soil in three peanut cultivars and the correlation of pod rot with environmental variables using 454 pyrosequencing. A total of 46,723 internal transcribed spacer high-quality sequences were obtained and grouped into 1,706 operational taxonomic units at the 97% similarity cut-off level. The coverage, rank abundance, and the Chao 1 and Shannon diversity indices of the operational taxonomic units were analyzed. Members of the phylum Ascomycota were dominant, such as Fusarium, Chaetomium, Alternaria, and Sordariomycetes, followed by Basidiomycota. The results of the heatmap and redundancy analysis revealed significant variation in the composition of the fungal community among the three cultivar samples. The environmental conditions in different peanut cultivars may also influence on the structure of the fungal community. The results of this study suggest that the causal agent of peanut pod rot may be more complex, and cultivars and environmental conditions are both important contributors to the community structure of peanut pod rot fungi.

Keywords

References

  1. Nayyar A, Hamel C, Lafond G, Gossen BD, Hanson K, Germida J. Soil microbial quality associated with yield reduction in continuous-pea. Appl Soil Ecol 2009;43:115-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.06.008
  2. Deacon JW. Fungal biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons;2009.
  3. Brussaard L, De Ruiter PC, Brown GG. Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2007;121: 233-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013
  4. Nehls U. Mastering ectomycorrhizal symbiosis: the impact of carbohydrates. J Exp Bot 2008;59:1097-108. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm334
  5. Song F, Pan Z, Bai F, An J, Liu J, Guo W, Bisseling T, Deng X, Xiao S. The scion/rootstock genotypes and habitats affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community in citrus. Front Microbiol 2015;6:1372.
  6. Sharma KK, Bhatnagar-Mathur P. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Methods Mol Biol 2006;343:347-58.
  7. Fabra A, Castro S, Tauriani T, Angelini J, Ibanez F, Dardanelli M, Tonelli M, Bianucci E, Valetti L. Interaction among Arachis hypogaea L. (peanut) and beneficial soil microorganisms: how much is it known? Crit Rev Microbiol 2010;36:179-94. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408410903584863
  8. Saleh OI. Wilt, root rot and seed diseases of groundnut in El- Minia Governorate, Egypt. Egypt J Phytopathol 1997;25:1-18.
  9. Melouk HA, Backman PA. Management of soilborne fungal pathogens. In: Melouk HA, Shokes FM, editors. Peanut health management. St. Paul (MN): APS Press; 1995. p. 75-82.
  10. Woodward JE, Baughman TA. Evaluation of Rhizoctonia diseases on peanut cultivars and advanced breeding lines in west Texas. Phytopathology 2007;97:S183.
  11. Sanogo S, Puppala N. Microorganisms associated with Valencia peanut affected by pod rot in New Mexico. Peanut Sci 2012;39:95-104. https://doi.org/10.3146/PS11-25.1
  12. Wheeler TA, Howell CR, Cotton J, Porter D. Pythium species associated with pod rot on west Texas peanuts and in vitro sensitivity of isolates to mefenoxam and azoxystrobin. Peanut Sci 2005;32:9-13. https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679(2005)32[9:PSAWPR]2.0.CO;2
  13. Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, Chen W; Fungal Barcoding Consortium; Fungal Barcoding Consortium Author List. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:6241-6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117018109
  14. Hanlin RT. The distribution of peanut fungi in the southeastern United States. Mycopathol Mycol Appl 1973;49:227-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050716
  15. Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Risede JM, Simoneau P, Hyde KD. Calonectria species and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: species with clavate vesicles. Stud Mycol 2006;55:213-26. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.55.1.213
  16. Lombard L, Crous PW, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. Species concepts in Calonectria (Cylindrocladium). Stud Mycol 2010; 66:1-13. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2010.66.01
  17. Xu L, Ravnskov S, Larsen J, Nilsson RH, Nicolaisen M. Soil fungal community structure along a soil health gradient in pea fields examined using deep amplicon sequencing. Soil Biol Biochem 2012;46:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.010
  18. Xu L, Ravnskov S, Larsen J, Nicolaisen M. Linking fungal communities in roots, rhizosphere, and soil to the health status of Pisum sativum. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2012;82:736-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01445.x
  19. Li XG, Ding CF, Zhang TL, Wang XX. Fungal pathogen accumulation at the expense of plant-beneficial fungi as a consequence of consecutive peanut monoculturing. Soil Biol Biochem 2014;72:11-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.019
  20. Sugiyama A, Vivanco JM, Jayanty SS, Manter DK. Pyrosequencing assessment of soil microbial communities in organic and conventional potato farms. Plant Dis 2010;94: 1329-35. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-10-0090
  21. Thiessen LD, Woodward JE. Diseases of peanut caused by soilborne pathogens in the southwestern United States. ISRN Agron 2012;2012:517905.
  22. Zhou W, Starr JL, Krumm JL, Sword GA. The fungal endophyte Chaetomium globosum negatively affects both above- and belowground herbivores in cotton. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2016;92:fiw158. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw158
  23. Zhang T, Wei XL, Zhang YQ, Liu HY, Yu LY. Diversity and distribution of lichen-associated fungi in the Ny- Alesund Region (Svalbard, High Artic) as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. Sci Rep 2015:5:14850. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14850
  24. Rehulka J, Kubatova A, Hubka V. Cephalotheca sulfurea (Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes), a new fungal pathogen of the farmes raibow trout Oncorhychus mykiss. J Fish Dis 2016;39:1413-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12477
  25. Lechat C, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ. The enigma of Calonectria species occurring on leaves of llex aquifolium in Europe. IMA Fungus 2010;1:101-8. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2010.01.02.01
  26. Chen M, Li X, Yang Q, Chi X, Pan L, Chen N, Yang Z, Wang T, Wang M, Yu S. Soil eukaryotic microorganism succession as affected by continuous of peanut-pathogenic and beneficial fungi were selected. PLoS One 2012;7:e40659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040659
  27. Yu C, Hu X, Deng W, Li Y, Han G, Ye C. Soil fungal community comparison of different mulberry genotypes and the relationship with mulberry fruit sclerotiniosis. Sci Rep 2016;6:28365. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28365
  28. Aleklett K, Hart M. The root microbiota: a fingerprint in the soil? Plant Soil 2013;370:671-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1647-7