경영과정보연구 (Management & Information Systems Review)

  • 제35권3호
  • /
  • Pages.95-113
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1598-2459(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-4767(eISSN)
대한경영정보학회 (Daehan Academy of Management Information Systems)
권호 표지

유전자은행의 운영성과 제고를 위한 유전자원이용촉진 판별요인의 탐색

Discriminant Factors Influencing Utilization of Genetic Resources

  • 성봉석 (우송대학교 국제경영학과) ;
  • 조원권 (우송대학교 철도경영학과)
  • Sung, Bong-Suk (Dept. of International Business Management, Woosong University) ;
  • Cho, Won-Guon (Dept. of Railroad Management, Woosong University)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.07
  • 심사 : 2016.09.01
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 유전자은행을 통한 유전자원활용을 극대화하기 위한 맥락에서 유전자은행의 유전자원이용에 대한 만족과 지속적 이용의 정도차이를 판별할 수 있는 요인, 즉 유전자원이용자(=연구자)가 유전자원에 부여하는 유용성 속성을 실증적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 기존문헌 고찰을 통해 연구자들이 유전자원에 부여하는 유용성 속성을 연구 활동에의 부합성, 유용특성정보, 활용가치, 연구 활동의 촉진성, 신규성으로 도출하고, 미생물유전자원을 이용하는 연구자들을 대상으로 유전자원이용정도가 높은 집단과 낮은 집단(유전자원이용에 대한 만족과 지속적 이용에 기초하여 분류)을 판별할 수 있는 유용성 속성의 파악을 위해 판별분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과, 5개의 유용성 속성 중에서 유전자원의 활용가치와 연구 활동에의 부합성이 판별력이 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 유용특성정보와 연구 활동의 촉진성은 판별력이 그리 높지 않았으며, 신규성은 판별력이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과에 기초하여 유전자원의 활용촉진을 위한 정책적 시사점을 제공하였으며, 본 연구의 한계점과 이를 극복하기 위한 향후 연구방향도 제시하였다.

The study examines the question of what discriminant factors may affect differences between two groups classified by researchers' satisfaction with and continuous use intention of genetic resources(microorganisms). Survey data from researchers who are using microorganisms from a gene bank was used to empirically test. The survey, covering 150 researchers, was conducted from March 26 through April 17 2015. Linear discriminant analysis was used to test the research questions described in the study. Results from the tests show that utilization value and suitability of genetic resources for researchers' R&D activities play key roles in discriminating between the two groups classified by researchers' satisfaction with and continuous use intention of genetic resources, relatively lower and higher groups. The results indicate that useful trait information of and degree in promotion of researches by genetic resources appear to be weak in discriminating between the two groups, and that novelty of genetic resources does not play a crucial role in making a distinction between the two groups. We propose some policy implications based on the results of the study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 미래창조과학부, "2012 국가생명연구자원 통계자료집," 대전: 한국생명공학연구원, 2013.
  2. 미래창조과학부․농림축산부․산업통상자원부․보건복지부․환경부․해양수산부․농촌진흥청․산림청․식품의약품안전처, "2013년도 생명연구자원관리 시행계획," 2013.
  3. Alderderfer, M. S. and Blashfield, R. K., Cluster Analysis, London: Sage, 1984.
  4. Beattie, A. J. et al., "New products industries from biodiversity," In Hassan, R., Scholes, R., and Ash, N(eds.), Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Current status and trends, Washington DC: Island Press, 2005, pp. 271-295.
  5. Borokini, T. I., "A systematic compilation of endemic flora in Nigeria for conservation managemen," Journal of Threatened Taxa, 6 2014, pp. 6406-6426.
  6. CBD, Factsheet: Uses of genetic resources, Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010.
  7. Cimato, A. and Attilio, C(eds.), Conservation, characterization, collection and utilization of the genetic resources in olive. Technical paper, Amsterdam: Common Fund for Commodities, 2008.
  8. Cohen, J. I., Williams, J. T., Plucknett, D. L. and Shands, H., "Ex situ conservation of plant genetic resource: Global development and environmental concerns," Science, 253 1991, pp. 866-872. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5022.866
  9. Craighead, C. W., Ketchen, D. J., Dunn, K. S. and Hult G. G., "Addressing common method variance: Guidelines for survey research on information technology, operations, and supply chain management," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58 2011, pp. 578-588. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2011.2136437
  10. Dekkers, F., Kent, A., Laurie, G. and Shalev, C., Genetic databases: Assessing the benefits and the impact on human and patient rights, A network of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2005.
  11. Desheva, G., Uhr, Z., Valchinova, E. and Uzundzhalieva, K., "Conservation and utilization of wild species of genus Triticum form The National Genebank of Bulgaria," Trakia Journal of Sciences, 12 2014, pp. 94-98.
  12. EC, Agricultural Genetic Resources from conservation to sustainable use. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee, COM(2013 833 final), Brussels, 2013.
  13. FAO, Second report on the state of the world's plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Rome, Italy, 2009.
  14. Fedder, B., Marine Genetic Resources, Access and Benefit Sharing: Legal and biological perspectives, New York: Routledge, 2013.
  15. Fowler, C. and Hodgkin, T., "Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: Assessing global availability," Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 29 2004, pp. 143-179. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.29.062403.102203
  16. Gollin, D. and Evenson, R., "Valuing animal genetic resources: Lessons from plant genetic resources," Ecological Economic, 45 2003, pp. 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00090-9
  17. Gulati, C., "'The tragedy of the commons' in plant genetic resources: The need for a new international regime centered around International Biotechnology Paten Office," Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 4 2014, Article 3.
  18. Harman, H. H., Modern Factor Analysis (3rd)(ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
  19. Harrigan, K. P., "An application of clustering for strategic group analysis," Strategic Management Journal, 6 1985, pp. 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060105
  20. Ketchen, D. J. and Shook, C. L. "The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique," Strategic Management Journal, 17 1996, pp. 441-458.
  21. Khoury, C., Laliberte, B. and Guarino, L., "Trends in ex situ conservation of plant genetic resource: A review of global crop and regional conservation strategies," Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 57 2010, pp. 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9534-z
  22. Koo, B. and Wright, B. D., "Strategies for timely evaluation of genebank accessions," In Smale, M.. and Koo, B(eds.), Biotechnology and Genetic Resource Policies: What is a Genebank Worth? International Food Policy Research Institute(IFPRI), Brief 10, pp. 1-3.
  23. McCouch, S. R., McNally, K. L., Wang, W. and Hamilton, R. S., "Genomics of gene banks: A case study in rice," American Journal of Botany, 99 2012, pp. 407-423. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100385
  24. Noriega, I. L. et al., "How policies affect the use of plant genetic resources: The experience of the CGIAR," Resources, 2 2013, pp. 231-269. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2030231
  25. NZBIO, Driving economic growth Bio- Based industries. The 2009 Bioeconomy Industry Summit of Research, Wellington, NZ, NZBIO, 2009.
  26. OECD, The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda-Main findings and policy conclusions, Paris: OECD, 2009.
  27. Oli, K. P., Feyerabend, G. B. and Lassen, B., Towards and accesses and benefit sharing framework agreement for the genetic resources and traditional knowledge of the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region, Kathmandu, Nepan: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, 2012.
  28. Padmanabhan, M. and Jungcurt, S., "Biocomplexity-conceptual challenges for institutional analysis in biodiversity governance," Ecological Economics, 81 2012, pp. 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.002
  29. Punj, G. and D. Stewart, "Cluster analysis in marketing research; review and suggestions for application," Journal of Marketing Research, 20 1983. pp. 134-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378302000204
  30. Rao, N. K., "Plant genetic resources: Advancing conservation and use through biotechnology," African Journal of Biotechnology, 3 2004, pp. 136-145.
  31. Roosen, J., Fadlaoui, A. and Bertaglia, M., Economic evaluation and biodiversity conservation of animal genetic resources, 17th-18th, November 2008, Hillerod, Denmark.
  32. Rubenstein, K. D. and Smale, M., International exchange of genetic resources, the role of information and implications for ownership: The case of the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System, EPTD Discussion Paper, No. 119, Washington: Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2004.
  33. Rubenstein, K. D., Heisey, P., Shoemaker, R. Sullivan, J. and Frisvold, G., Crop genetic resources: An economic appraisal. A Report for the Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 2005.
  34. Sagnia, B. K., Strengthening local creative industries and developing culture capacity for proverty alleviation. International Network for Cultural Diversity, Sixth annual conference 17-20 November 2005, Dakar, Senegal, 2005.
  35. Sarr, M., Goeschi, T. and Swanson, T., "The value of conserving genetic resources for R&D: A survey," Ecological Economics, 67 2008, pp. 184-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.004
  36. Schei, P. J. and Tvedt, M. W., "'Genetic resources' in the CBD: The wording, the past, the present and the future," Genetics, 6, 2010, pp. 533-543.
  37. Schei, P. J. and Tvedt, M. W., "Genetic resource" in the CBD: The wording, the past, the present and the future. FNI Report 4/2010, Norway: Fridtjof Nansens Institute, 2010.
  38. Shankar, S. and Uday, Y., "Biobanking: Basic concepts and role in rheumatology," Indian Journal of Rheumatology, 6 2011, pp. 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-3698(11)60075-7
  39. Sung, B. and Hwang, K., "Firms' intentions to use genetically modified organisms industrially: The influence of sociopoliticaleconomic forces and managerial interpretations in the Korean context," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80 2013, pp. 1387-1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.006
  40. TEEB, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, 2009.
  41. Tvedt, M. W. and Young, T., "Beyond access: Exploring implementation of the fair and equitable sharing commitment in the CBD," IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper, No. 67/2, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2007.
  42. Ukalska, J. and Kociuba, W., "Phenotypical diversity of winter triticale genotypes collected in the Polish gene bank between 1982 and 2008 with regard to major quantitative traits," Field Crops Research, 149 2013, pp. 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.010
  43. Upadhyaya, H. D., Gowda, G. L. L. and Sastry, D. V. S. S. R., "Plant genetic resources management: Collection, characterization, conservation and utilization," Journal of SAT Agricultural Research, 6 2008, pp. 1-14.
  44. Varaprasad, K. S. and Sivaraj, N., "Plant genetic resources conservation and use in light of recent policy developments," Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1 2010, pp. 1276-1293.
  45. Walters, C., Volk, G. M. and Richards, C. M., "Genebanks in the post-genomic age: Emerging roles and anticipated uses," Biodiversity, 9 2008, pp. 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2008.9712887
  46. Wambugu, P. et al., "Conservation utilization of African oryza genetic resources," Ricd, 6 2014, pp. 1-13.
  47. WIPO, Intergovernmental committee on intellectual property and genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore: The national policy on traditional knowledge, genetic resources and traditional cultural expressions(Kenya). The Secretariat of World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO/GRTKF/IC/16/INF/25. Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.