Tunnel and Underground Space (터널과지하공간)

Korean Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering (한국암반공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear Behavior Characteristics of Rock Joints Considering Roughness Parameters

암석 절리면의 거칠기와 전단거동의 특성 분석

  • Received : 2016.08.24
  • Accepted : 2016.10.12
  • Published : 2016.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Both the roughness measurement tests and the multi-stage shear tests were carried out on the 110 rock joint samples in order to investigate the influences of rock type, joint roughness and normal stress on the shear behaviour of rock joints. Test samples were composed of quartz porphyry, dacite, granite and gneiss, which were classified into three detailed groups according to their JRC values. Roughness parameters of rock joints were analyzed by roughness measurement tests, and shear characteristics were also investigated by multi-stage shear tests. Both peak shear strength and shear stiffness were increased as both joint roughness and normal stress were increased, whereas dilation angles showed lower values at the lower roughness and higher normal stress conditions. Besides, shear characteristics obtained from all tests of four different rock types with different rock strengths showed irrelevant details, therefore the influences of both joint roughness and normal stress on shear behaviors were found to be more considerable than the strength of intact rock. The results obtained from both multi-stage shear tests and direct shear tests were finally compared, where the dilation angles obtained from multi-stage shear tests were found to be valid only for the first normal stress conditions.

절리면의 전단거동 특성을 알아보기 위하여 암석종류와 거칠기가 서로 다른 110개의 자연 암석 절리면 시료에 대하여 거칠기 측정시험과 다단계전단시험을 실시하였다. 시험 암석은 석영반암, 석영안산암, 화강암, 편마암의 4가지 종류이고, 절리면은 JRC값에 따라 3가지 그룹으로 분류하였다. 거칠기 측정시험을 통해 절리면의 거칠기 파라미터를 분석하였으며, 다단계전단시험을 통해 암석종류, 절리면 거칠기, 수직응력의 변화가 각종 전단특성에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 절리면의 거칠기와 수직응력이 커질수록 최대전단강도와 전단강성은 증가하였고, 거칠기가 작고 수직응력이 커질수록 팽창각은 감소하였다. 절리면의 전단특성은 암석종류와 거의 무관한 것으로 나타나 모암의 강도보다는 거칠기와 수직응력에 더 큰 영향을 받았다. 또한 동일 암석 절리면에 대한 다단계시험과 직접전단시험의 결과를 비교분석함으로써 두 시험법의 특징을 고찰하였으며, 다단계시험으로 구한 팽창각은 시험 전반부의 낮은 수직응력수준에서 얻은 값만 유효한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bandis, S.C., A.C. Lumsden and N.R. Barton, 1983, Fundamentals of rock joint deformation, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 20, 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(83)90595-8
  2. Barton, N.R., 1976, The shear strength of rock and rock joint, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 12, 255-279.
  3. Barton, N.R. and V. Choubey, 1977, The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice, Rock Mech., 10, 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261801
  4. Cho, T.C., H.W. Suk and J.G. Lee, 2013, A study of the effect of asperity change on the shear strength of joint plane, Tunnel and Underground Space, 23.5, 401-412. https://doi.org/10.7474/TUS.2013.23.5.401
  5. Deere, D.U. and R.P. Miller, 1966, Engineering classification and index properties of rock, Technical Report No. AFNL-TR-65-116, Albuquerque, NM: Air Force Weapons Laboratory.
  6. Hong, Y.G., 2009, A study on the variation of roughness characteristics of rock joint after shear failure, Master thesis of Cheongju Univ.
  7. Jang, B.A. and J.S. Cho, 1999, A study on shearing characteristics of joint model, The Journal of Engineering Geology, 9.1, 69-82.
  8. Kim, D.B., S.G. Lee and C.I. Lee, 2001, The engineering properties of shear strength of rock joints in Korea, Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 17.4, 301-315.
  9. Kim, Y.J, Y.H. Lee, S.K. Kim, and J.H. Kim, 2005, A study on shear behaviors for the rock joint in the constant normal stiffness condition, Tunnel and Underground Space, 15.5, 330-337.
  10. KSRM, 2009, Standard test methods for determining direct shear strength of rock in laboratory, Tunnel and Underground Space, 19.4, 269-272.
  11. Lee, J.U, C.G. Rhee, S.I. Hwang, C.J. Chang and W.H. Choi, 1993, Relationship between shear behavior characteristics and mechanical parameters of fractures, The Journal of Engineering Geology, 3.1, 1-20.
  12. Lee, M.H, J.W. Kim and K.T. Chang, 2007, The influence of rock joint roughness and normal stress on shear behaviour, Tunnel and Underground Space, 17.3, 186-196.
  13. Lee, S.D, J.H. Kang, and C,I. Lee, 1994, Shear strength and deformation behavior of rock joint with roughness., Tunnel and Underground Space, 4, 261-273.
  14. Maerz, N.H., J.A. Franklin and C.P. Bennett, 1990, Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min Sci. 27.5, 329-343.
  15. Park, B.K, C.S. Lee, and S.W. Jeon, 2007, Shear behavior of rough granite joints under CNS conditions, Tunnel and Underground Space, 17.3, 203-215.
  16. Tse, R. and D.M. Cruden, 1979, Estimating joint roughness coefficients, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min Sci. 16, 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)90241-9
  17. Yang, Z.Y. and S.C. Lo, 1997, An index for describing the anisotropy of joint surfaces, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34, 1031-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80012-3
  18. Yoon, J.S., D.Y. Kim, H.S. Lee and H.I. Yoon, 1998, A study on the shear strength measurement of the seoul granite by the multi-stage direct shear test, Journal of Korean Society for Geosystem Engineering, 35.5, 435-443.