환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)

한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 유류오염 군부지 내 자연저감기법 적용 사례 연구

A Case Study of Monitored Natural Attenuation at a Military Site Contaminated by Petroleum Hydrocarbon in Korea

  • 투고 : 2016.10.07
  • 심사 : 2016.10.18
  • 발행 : 2016.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 유류오염 지역인 유류보급 군부대 일대의 지하수에 대한 수질 측정 및 분석, 추적자시험, 지하수유형분석 등 수리지질학적 특성을 통하여 오염부지에서 나타나는 자연저감의 효과를 파악하였다. 또한 이 결과를 반영하여 최종적으로 거리별 자연 저감율 및 발현된 생분해능 등을 평가하였다. 거리에 따른 자연저감율을 평가한 결과, 선형기울기($K/V_x$)는 -0.0248로 계산되었으며 산정된 체적저감율은 $1.7{\times}10^{-3}/day$로 나타났다. 연구지역의 발현된 BTEX 총 생분해능은 9.1~10.0 mg/L의 범위(평균 9.7 mg/L)에 있으며 탈질화 과정이 약 63.6%로 가장 큰 영향을 주는 redox 과정임을 확인하였다. 본 유류오염지역의 지하수 BTEX 오염농도 평균 1.326 mg/L임을 고려할 때 생분해능은 충분할 것으로 판단된다.

In this study, the efficiency of natural attenuation was evaluated through the hydrogeological characteristics such as monitoring and analyses, tracer tests, chemical composition analysis of the groundwater at a military site contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbon in korea. Also, based on the results, the natural attenuation rate by distance and the expressed biodegradation capacity(EBC) was evaluated. The regression slope of -0.0248($K/V_x$) and bulk attenuation rate of $1.7{\times}10^{-3}/day$ were calculated respectively. The range of total expressed biodegradation capacity(EBC) of BTEX was shown from 9.1 mg/L to 10.0 mg/L(average 9.7 mg/L). It was confirmed that the denitrification which was expressed about 63.6% in the total EBC is the largest influence redox process. Consequently, the biodegradation capacity is considered to be sufficient for remediation in the BTEX average concentration of 1.326 mg/L.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barker JF, Patrick JF, Major D. 1987. Natural attenuation of aromatic hydrocarbons in a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water Monit. Rev. 7: 64-71.
  2. Chapelle FH. 1999. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated ground water: the perspectives of history and hydrology. Ground Water. 37: 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00965.x
  3. Cleary RW, Rorech GJ, McCreadie H. 2001. Introduction to monitored natural attenuation [MoNA], Natural Attenuation, Risk Assessment. and Risk-Based Corrective Action:NGWA's Short Course Material. Westerville. Ohio.
  4. Lee CH. 2000. Site assessment and in-situ remediation technology application for contaminated sites. Ph.D. dissertation. Seoul National University. Seoul. Korea. [Korean Literature]
  5. Lee JY. 2001. Hydrogeological investigation and attenuation characteristics for a petroleum contaminated site. Ph.D. dissertation. Seoul National University. [Korean Literature]
  6. McAllister PM, Chiang CY. 1994. A practical approach to evaluate natural attenuation of contaminants in ground water. Ground Water Nonit. Rem. 14: 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00111.x
  7. Sauty JP, Kinzelbach W. 1992. CATTI: Computer aided tracer test interpretation. International Groundwater Modeling Center. Golden. Colorado.
  8. Suarez MP, Rifai HS. 2002. Evaluation of BTEX remediation by natural attenuation at a coastal facility. Ground Water Monit. 22: 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00655.x
  9. USEPA. 1997. Use of monitored natural attenuation at Superfund. RCRA corrctive action and underground storage tank sites. Draft interim final. OSWER Directive 9200.4-17. USEPA. washington. DC.
  10. USEPA. 1998. Seminars: Monitored natural attenuation for groundwater. ORD EPA/625/K-98/001. USEPA. Washington. DC.
  11. Wiedemieier TH, Wilson JT, Kampbell DH, Miller RN, Hansen JE. 1996. Approximation of biodegradation rate constants for monoaromatic hydrocarbon (BTEX) in groundwater. Ground Water Monit. Rem. 16: 186-194 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.1996.tb00149.x
  12. Wiedemeier TH, Rifai HS, Nwell CJ, Wilson JT. 1999. Natural Attenuation of Fuel and Chlorinated Solvents in the Subsurface. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York: 617.
  13. Wiedemeier TH. 1999. Natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents-performance and cost results from multiple air force demonstration sites. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence. Texas: 101.