벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제11권2호
  • /
  • Pages.183-195
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

소상공인 경영 컨설팅: 트리플 힐릭스 적용의 효과

Small-business Counseling: Impact for Applying Triple Helix

  • 투고 : 2015.12.14
  • 심사 : 2016.04.07
  • 발행 : 2016.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

소상공인이 한국 경제에서 차지하는 비중이 높지만 전문적인 경영 역량이 부족하여 어려움에 처하는 경우가 많다. 그러나 이에 대한 실효성 있는 대안은 부족하다. 소상공인의 경영 문제에 관한 학계의 관심은 주로 성공적인 소상공인의 특징을 밝히거나 요인들 간의 관련성을 살펴보는 기술적이고 정량적 데이터 위주의 단편적 성과에 머물렀다. 한편 실질적인 경영 지원 과정을 통해 획득된 지식과 경험들을 이론적으로 논의하는 실천적 연구 성과는 찾아보기 어려운 형편이다. 2015년 6월부터 2015년 11월까지 경기도에 소재한 소상공인 업체들과 경기도 소재의 대학 및 경기도 소재의 중소기업진흥 기관이 공동으로 추진한 컨설팅 프로젝트에 실행 연구법을 부분 적용한 결과 트리플 힐릭스 이론 기반의 소상공인 컨설팅이 바람직한 결과를 가져온다는 사실을 알 수 있었다. 업체와 대학 그리고 공공 기관의 협업은 경영학을 배우는 학생들의 문제의식을 높이고 지식을 활용하는 기회를 부여하는 등 경영교육 상 목적 달성에 적절함도 확인했다.

Although we have faced substantial public interests on the issues of small-business, the lack of effective solutions corresponding to them should be worried. This paper introduces findings from the application of Triple Helix to counseling activities for small-business stores with diagnosing problems and suggesting alternatives. The findings of this paper are based on counseling projects conducted by Gyunggi Small-medium Business Corporation, universities in the region, and multiple small-business stores together from June to November in 2015. The application of Triple Helix was positive for increasing the effectiveness of counseling, and this key finding was obtained from action research cycles. It was also confirmed that cooperation from three different entities including company, university and government institute was beneficial in increasing problem identification capabilities by students and providing opportunities for testing knowledge and skills, which means Triple Helix application to small-business helps management education to be more practical. Contributions of this study supplies substantial insights to academic audience, and practitioners can learn positive effects of Triple Helix and potential issues for implementation in the context of small-business counseling.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Addie, J. P. D., Keil, R. & Olds, K.(2015). Beyond Town and Gown: Universities, Territoriality and the Mobilization of New Urban Structures in Canada, Territory, Politics, Governance, 3(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2014.924875
  2. Adler, P. S.(2001). Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism, Organization Science, 12(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117
  3. Baskerville, R. L. & Myers, M. D.(2004). Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems: Making IS Research Relevant to Practice, MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148642
  4. Baskerville, R. L. & Wood-Harper, A. T.(1996). A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research, Journal of Information Technology, 11(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/026839629601100305
  5. Bin, B. & Park, J.(2002). An Empirical Study on the Success Factors of a Small Business Starting-Up, The Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 24(3), 135-158.
  6. Blenker, P., Dreisler, P., Færgemann, H. M., & Kjeldsen, J.(2008). A Framework for Developing Entrepreneurship Education in a University Context, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 5(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2008.015953
  7. Brannback, M., Carsrud, A., Krueger Jr, N. & Elfving, J.(2008). Challenging the Triple Helix Model of Regional Innovation Systems: A Venture-Centric Model, International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTE.2008.020539
  8. Carlisle, S., Kunc, M., Jones, E. & Tiffin, S.(2013). Supporting Innovation for Tourism Development through Multi-Stakeholder Approaches: Experiences from Africa, Tourism Management, 35, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.05.010
  9. Charmaz, K.(2014). Constructing Grounded Theory, Sage.
  10. Choi, J. & Yang. Y.(2012). Program Development for Entrepreneurship Education, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.7.1.201203.125
  11. Davidson, E. & Heslinga, D.(2006). Bridging the IT Adoption Gap for Small Physician Practices: An Action Research Study on Electronic Health Records, Information Systems Management, 24(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530601036786
  12. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L.(2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  13. Etzkowitz, H.(2003a). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
  14. Etzkowitz, H.(2003b). Research Groups as 'Quasi-Firms': The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University, Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
  15. Etzkowitz, H.(2010). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action, Routledge.
  16. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L.(1965). Discovery of Substantive Theory: A Basic Strategy Underlying Qualitative Research, American Behavioral Scientist, 8(6), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426500800602
  17. Gorman, G. Hanlon, D. & King, W.(1997). Some Research Perspectives on Entrepreneurship Education, Enterprise Education and Education for Small Business Management: a Ten-year Literature Review, International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242697153004
  18. Greenwood, D. J. & Levin, M.(2006). Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change, Sage.
  19. Gregor, G.(2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611-642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742
  20. Im, J., Kim, Y. & Chung, S.(2014). A Case Study on the Development of an ICT Convergence Innovation Cluster for Creative Economy, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 17(1), 1-24.
  21. Ivanova, I. A. & Leydesdorff, L.(2014). Rotational Symmetry and the Transformation of Innovation Systems in a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.022
  22. Jauhiainen, J. S. & Suorsa, K.(2008). Triple Helix in the Periphery: The Case of Multipolis in Northern Finland, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(2), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn009
  23. Jung, J. & Cho, C.(2014). A Study on the Analysis of Factors Affecting Business Scuccess of Small Enterprises, Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Socieity, 9(2), 137-159.
  24. Kwun, M. & Jeong, H.(2012). The Effect of Entrepreneurs' Characteristic, Technological Capabilities and Network on Firm Performance of Technology-based Start-ups, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.7.1.201203.7
  25. Lee, C. W., Lee, J. H. & Park, K. S.(2010). An Inquiry into the Triple Helix as a New Regional Innovation Model, Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 13(3), 335-352. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2010.13.3.335
  26. Lee, S. & Chung, S.(2014). Interaction between Innovation Actors in Innovation Cluster: A Case of Daedeok Innopolis, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 17(4), 820-844.
  27. Lee, Y. T.(2014). The Effects of New Store Movement (University Student Field Study) on University Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions and Small Enterprise Owners' Management Performances, The Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 36(1), 135-157.
  28. Lewin, K.(1997). Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science, American Psychological Association.
  29. Leydesdorff, L.(2000). The Triple Helix: An Evolutionary Model of Innovations, Research Policy, 29(2), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3
  30. Leydesdorff, L. & Sun, Y.(2009). National and International Dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-Industry-Government Versus International Coauthorship Relations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20997
  31. Marquardt, M. J.(1996). Building the Learning Organization, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
  32. Matlay, H. & Mitra, J.(2002). Entrepreneurship and Learning: the Double Act in the Triple Helix, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000002101298999
  33. Myers, M. D.(1997). Qualitative Research in Information Systems, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21, 241-242. https://doi.org/10.2307/249422
  34. Nam, J. G.(2014). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations in Biotechology Cluster: The Case of Singapore, Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 17(4), 801-816. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2014.17.4.801
  35. Noffke, S.(1994). Action Research: Towards the Next Generation, Educational Action Research, 2(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799400200010
  36. Nonaka, I.(1991). The Knowledge-Creating Company, Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
  37. Park, J., Chung, G. & Park, B.(2006). The Relationship between Personal Characteristics of Small Business Entrepreneurs and Performance, Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Socieity, 1(2), 117-133.
  38. Park, K. S. & Lee, C. W.(2013). Characteristics of Interaction among Actors in Triple Helix of Cultural Contents Industry Cluster in Daegu, Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 19(3), 401-415.
  39. Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H.(2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society, Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
  40. Rezgui, Y.(2007). Knowledge Systems and Value Creation: An Action Research Investigation, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(2), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710723796
  41. Rosemann, M. & Vessey, I.(2008). Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks, MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148826
  42. Suh, G. H.(2007). An Empirical Study on the Critical Success of Recession - Resistant and Management Renovation in Small Retail Dealer: Korea Government Policy Suggestion for Small Retail Dealers, The Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 29(4), 265-293.
  43. Susman, G. I.(1983). Action Research: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective, in Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, Morgan G. (ed), Newbury Park: Sage, 95-113.
  44. Takey, S. M. & de Carvalho, M. M.(2015). Competency Mapping in Project Management: An Action Research Study in an Engineering Company, International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 784-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.013
  45. Yoo, S., Kim, J. & Park, C.(2000). An Analysis of Satisfaction of Counselors of Small Business Development in Korea and Suggestions for Service Improvements, The Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 22(1), 337-350.
  46. Yuck, W. S. & Ryu, T. M.(2004). A Study on the Efficient Improvement Scheme of the Support System for Small Business, Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 8, 347-367.