The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective study on marginal bone loss around maxillary anterior implants with or without bone graft

상악 전치부에서 골 이식 유무에 따른 임플란트 변연골 소실에 관한 후향적 연구

  • Hwang, Hee-Sun (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jung, Ji-Hye (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Lee (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University)
  • 황희선 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 정지혜 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김유리 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2016.01.05
  • Accepted : 2016.04.04
  • Published : 2016.04.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study is to evaluate the clinical significance of implantation with simultaneous bone graft by comparing the marginal bone loss around maxillary anterior implants with or without bone graft. Materials and methods: Patients treated with implant-retained restorations on maxillary anterior region at Implant Center, Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University between June 2011 and May 2014 were included in this study. Date of implant placement, implant diameter, implant length, implant-abutment connection type and whether the bone graft was done were investigated. The patient's periapical radiographs taken immediately after implantation and at the most recent visit were compared. Marginal bone loss was measured using Emago advanced v5.6 program (Oral diagnostic systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Statistical analysis was done in independent t-test by using SPSS 22.0 program. Results: As a result of observing on 83 implants (without bone graft: 44, with bone graft: 39) of 52 patients for 6 - 45 months (average: 18.4 months), implants without bone graft showed $1.42{\pm}0.42mm$, implants with bone graft showed $1.28{\pm}0.45mm$ of marginal bone loss. Conclusion: In limitations of this study, implants with simultaneous bone graft had significantly less marginal bone loss than implants without bone graft.

목적: 상악 전치부 임플란트 식립시 골 이식 유무에 따른 임플란트의 변연골 소실량을 측정, 비교하여 임플란트 식립과 동시에 시행하는 골 이식의 임상적 의의를 평가하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 2011년 6월부터 2014년 5월 사이에 원광대학교 치과병원 임플란트 센터에서 상악 전치부에 임플란트를 식립하고 보철치료를 진행한 환자를 대상으로 진료기록부를 확인하여 임플란트 식립 시기, 고정체의 직경 및 길이, 지대주 연결방법, 골이식 유무를 조사하였다. 임플란트 식립 직후와 가장 최근 내원 시의 치근단 방사선 사진을 비교하였으며 Emago advanced v5.6 (Oral diagnostic systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands) 프로그램을 사용하여 임플란트 변연골 소실량을 측정하였다. 골 이식 유무가 임플란트 주위 변연골 소실에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위하여 Window용 SPSS 프로그램을 이용한 독립표본 t 검정을 시행하였다. 결과: 환자 52명에서 83개 임플란트(골 이식 없이 식립된 임플란트 44개, 골 이식과 동시에 식립된 임플란트 39개)를 대상으로 6 - 45개월(평균 18.4개월)동안 관찰한 결과 골 이식 없이 식립된 임플란트는 $1.42{\pm}0.42mm$, 골 이식과 동시에 식립된 임플란트는 $1.28{\pm}0.45mm$의 변연골 소실을 보였다. 결론: 본 연구의 한계 내에서, 골 이식과 동시에 식립된 임플란트의 변연골 소실량이 유의하게 적었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bergman B. Evaluation of the results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:114-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90176-2
  2. Walid AJ, Shi Bin. Restoration of missing upper anterior teeth using dental implant simultaneous with bone grafting- A case report. J Dent Oral health 2014;1:1-8.
  3. McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 2007;78:377-96. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060048
  4. Boronat A, Carrillo C, Penarrocha M, Pennarocha M. Dental implants placed simultaneously with bone grafts in horizontal defects: a clinical retrospective study with 37 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:189-96.
  5. Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Santoro A, Sbordone L. Volume changes of iliac crest autogenous bone grafts after vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillas and mandibles: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:2559-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.040
  6. Bengazi F, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:303-10. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070401.x
  7. Kwon JY, Kim YS, Kim CW. Assessing changes of peri-implant bone using digital subtraction radiography. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001;39:273-80.
  8. Han WJ. A comparison of subtracted images from dental subtraction programs. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2002;32:147-51.
  9. Bittar-Cortez JA, Passeri LA, de Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:258-62. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/84778143
  10. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:313-23.
  11. Chang YY, Kang DH, Park JC, Kim JH, Yun JH, Kim ST, Jung UW, Park YB, Kim CS, Shim JS, Moon HS, Choi SH. Treatment of dehiscence or fenestration defect on maxillary anterior implants using guided bone regeneration: Case report. J Dental Implant Res 2011;30:65-70.
  12. Johansson B, Back T, Hirsch JM. Cutting torque measurements in conjunction with implant placement in grafted and nongrafted maxillas as an objective evaluation of bone density: a possible method for identifying early implant failures? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00022.x
  13. Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:173-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01269.x
  14. Tonetti MS, Hammerle CH; European Workshop on Periodontology Group C. Advances in bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:168-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01268.x
  15. Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Cavallaro J, Elian N, Tarnow D. Flap advancement: practical techniques to attain tension-free primary closure. J Periodontol 2009;80:4-15. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080344
  16. Hellem S, Astrand P, Stenstroom B, Engquist B, Bengtsson M, Dahlgren S. Implant treatment in combination with lateral augmentation of the alveolar process: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:233-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00206.x
  17. Benic GI, Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hammerle CH. Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:507-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01583.x
  18. Bazrafshan N, Darby I. Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed with simultaneous bone augmentation in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:768-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12185
  19. von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x
  20. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:254-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00208.x
  21. Kim CY, Kim SS, In HS, Kim YL. Evaluation of marginal bone loss around platform-switched implants by digital subtraction radiography. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2015;31:33-44. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2015.31.1.33
  22. Koo KT, Lee EJ, Kim JY, Seol YJ, Han JS, Kim TI, Lee YM, Ku Y, Wikesjo UM, Rhyu IC. The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis. J Periodontol 2012;83:1104-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110456
  23. Gurgel-Juarez NC, de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas AC Jr, Anchieta RB, de Vargas LC, Kina S, Franca FM. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. J Prosthodont 2012;21:160-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00801.x
  24. Schwarz F, Alcoforado G, Nelson K, Schaer A, Taylor T, Beuer F, Strietzel FP. Impact of implant-abutment connection, positioning of the machined collar/microgap, and platform switching on crestal bone level changes. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1301-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12269