Korean Security Journal (시큐리티연구)

  • Issue 46
  • /
  • Pages.87-112
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2671-4299(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-0644(eISSN)
Korean Security Science Association (한국경호경비학회)
권호 표지

Effects of Perceived Autonomy Support on Intrinsic Motivation and Passion for Major students of Security Martial Arts

경호무도 전공자의 지각된 자율성지지가 내재적 동기 및 열정에 미치는 영향

  • 양진영 (성균관대학교 스포츠과학대학 체력과학연구소) ;
  • 임태희 (용인대학교 무도대학 태권도경기지도학과) ;
  • 김동현 (동아대학교 스포츠과학대학 태권도학과)
  • Received : 2016.02.04
  • Accepted : 2016.03.13
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of perceived autonomy support on intrinsic motivation and passion for major students of security martial arts. The subjects were selected 317 people to security martial arts majors universities in the metropolitan area extraction using a convenience sample. AS autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and passion by research tools construct validity were utilized for statistical verification. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, frequency analysis, exploratory factors analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis using the SPSS 21.0 and confirmatory factors analysis and structural equation modeling(SEM) using AMOS 21.0. The results of this study were as follows. First, autonomy support of major students for security martial arts had a positive impact on intrinsic motivation. Second, autonomy support of major students for security martial arts had a positive impact on harmonious passion. Third, autonomy support of major students for security martial arts had a impact on obsessive passion. Forth, intrinsic motivation of major students for security martial arts had a positive impact on harmonious passion. Fifth, intrinsic motivation of major students for security martial arts had a negative impact on obsessive passion. The results of structural equation modeling showed that intrinsic motivation partially mediated the relationship between autonomy support and harmonious passion. And the relationships between autonomy support and obsessive passion were completely mediated by the intrinsic motivation.

본 연구의 목적은 경호무도 전공자의 지각된 자율성지지가 내재적 동기와 열정에 미치는 영향을 규명하는 것이었다. 연구대상은 편의표본추출법(convenience sampling method)을 이용하여 수도권 대학의 경호무도 전공자들 317명을 선정하였다. 조사도구는 자율성지지, 내재적 동기, 열정으로 구인타당도 검증 후 통계처리에 활용하였다. 자료처리는 기술통계, 탐색적 및 확인적 요인분석, 상관관계분석, 구조모형검증을 하였다. 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 경호무도 전공자의 지각된 자율성지지는 내재적 동기에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다. 둘째, 경호무도 전공자의 자율성지지는 조화열정에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다. 셋째, 경호무도 전공자의 자율성지지는 강박열정에 영향을 미치지 않는다. 넷째, 경호무도 전공자의 내재적 동기는 조화열정에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다. 다섯째, 경호무도 전공자의 내재적 동기는 강박열정에 부정적 영향을 미친다. 경호무도 전공자의 지각된 자율성지지와 조화열정 및 강박열정 간의 관계에서 내재적 동기는 부분 및 완전 매개역할로 작용함을 확인하였다. 종합해볼 때, 경호무도 전공자의 자율성지지에 의한 무도수련활동에서 자기 결정적 동기화를 통하여 자발적인 의지가 발생됨을 알 수 있었다. 또한 경호무도 전공자의 자율성지지에 의한 내재적 욕구충족에 따른 개인 및 대인적 압박감에 의해 빠른 시기에 설정된 목표를 이루고자 하는 욕구가 발생될 가능성도 고려해야 함을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 공배완. (2006). 한국 민간경비 교육 . 제도의 문제점과 발전방안. 한국경호경비학회지, 12: 51-72.
  2. 공배완. (2007). 국내 대학 경호비서학과의 교육과정 특성에 관한 연구. 한국경호경비학회지, 13: 1-21.
  3. 공배완. (2009). 경호학과와 경호비서학과의 교육과정 비교 . 분석을 통한 경호비서의 정체성 모색. 한국경호경비학회지, 20: 1-18.
  4. 김기형 . 박중길. (2009). 대학 운동선수의 지각된 자율성 지지와 기본욕구 및 동기적 성향간의 구조모형 검증. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 20(3): 33-48.
  5. 문창일 . 김병준 . 최만식 . 문익수. (2005). 한국판 스포츠동기 척도 (KSMS-27) 의 타당도 점검. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 16(2): 49-70.
  6. 박문선. (2009). 경호업무 효율성에 관한 연구 : 공공경호와 민간경호의 효율성 영향요인의 비교분석. 한국경호경비학회지, 19: 67-103.
  7. 박중길 . 김민희 . 김민정. (2010). 인문, 사회과학편: 지각된 무용 자율성 지지 검사지의 개발과 교차 타당화. 한국체육학회지-인문사회과학, 49(2): 385-398.
  8. 송영남 . 김병찬. (2010). 민간경호원에 대한 경호무도교육시스템 발전방안. 대한무도학회지, 12(3), 327-342.
  9. 유진 . 정꽃님. (2008). 무용 열정의 이원론적 모형 분석. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 19(1): 163-175.
  10. 이민형 . 이강문. (2009). 경호관련학과의 경호무도교육 발전방안. 대한무도학회지, 11(1): 251-261.
  11. 이정학 . 장성수. (2009). 무도수련의 교육적 가치 재발견. 대한무도학회지, 11(1): 49-57.
  12. 황종대 . 구강본 . 김동규. (2011). 체육철학: 한국합기도 활법수행의 무도철학적 함의. 움직임의철학: 한국체육철학회지, 19(4): 193-204.
  13. Amorose, A. J., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2007). Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: A test of self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 654-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.11.003
  14. Blanchard, C. M., Amiot, C. E., Perreault, S. V., & Vallerand, R. J. P. (2009). Cohesiveness, coach’s interpersonal style and psychological needs: Their effects on self-determination and athletes’ subjective well-being. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.02.005
  15. Blanchard, C. M., Amiot, C. E., Perreault, S., Vallerand, R. J., & Provencher, P. (2009). Cohesiveness, coach’s interpersonal style and psychological needs: Their effects on self-determination and athletes’ subjective well-being. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(5), 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.02.005
  16. Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  17. Conroy, D. E., & Coatsworth, J. D. (2007). Assessing autonomy-supportive coaching strategies in youth sport. Psychology of sport and exercise, 8(5), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.001
  18. Cox, A., & Williams, L. (2008). The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 222-239. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.2.222
  19. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits : Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03
  20. Deci, E. L. (1976). Notes on the theory and metatheory of intrinsic motivation. Organizational behavior and human performance, 15(1), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90033-7
  21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 3-33.
  23. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and individual differences, 8(3), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90013-8
  24. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. U., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4). 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6
  25. Friedman, M. (2003). Autonomy, gender, politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., Amoura, S., & Baldes, B. (2010). Influence of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ motivation and sport performance: A test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(2), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.10.004
  27. Haggar, F. A., & Boushey, R. P. (2009). Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 22(4), 191. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1242458
  28. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  29. Hodgins, H. S., & Knee, C. R. (2002). The integrating self and conscious experience. Handbook of self-determination research, 87-100.
  30. Koestner, R., & Losier, G. (2002). Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation.
  31. Levy, A. R., Polman, R. C., & Borkoles, E. (2008). Examining the relationship between perceived autonomy support and age in the context of rehabilitation adherence in sport. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.53.2.224
  32. Lim, B. S. C., & Wang, J. C. K. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioral regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.003
  33. Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of sports science, 21(11), 883-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140374
  34. Mageau, G. A., Vallerand, R. J., Charest, J., Salvy, S. J., Lacaille, N., Bouffard, T., & Koestner, R. (2009). On the development of harmonious and obsessive passion: The role of autonomy support, activity specialization, and identification with the activity. Journal of Personality, 77(3), 601-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00559.x
  35. Melanson, H. P.(1988). The Politics of Protection: The U.S. Secret Service in the Terrorist Age. Praeger Publishers.
  36. Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of educational psychology, 97(3), 444. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.444
  37. Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory, 3rd. New Yokr: Mcgraw-Hill.
  38. Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Human learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson.
  39. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603-619. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748
  40. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Briere, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and emotion, 25(4), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406
  41. Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings.
  42. Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 24-33.
  43. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of educational psychology, 98(1), 209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
  44. Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & SS. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited: Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 31-60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  45. Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of educational psychology, 95(2), 375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375
  46. Reinboth, M., & Duda, J. L. (2006). Perceived motivational climate, need satisfaction and indices of well-being in team sports: A longitudinal perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(3), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.06.002
  47. Rousseau, F. L., & Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Passion, affect, and subjective well-being among seniors. Manuscript in preparation, Concordia University, Montral, Canada.
  48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  49. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  50. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
  51. Spreng, R. A., MacKenzie, S. B., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1996). A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. The Journal of Marketing, 15-32.
  52. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97
  53. Vallerand, R. J. (2008). On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people’s lives most worth living. Canadian Psychology, 49, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.1
  54. Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C. F., Léonard, M., Gagne, M., & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l'âmee: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756-767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756
  55. Vallerand, R. J., Rousseau, F. L., Grouzel, F. M. E., Dumais, A., Grenier, S., & Blanchard, C. M.(2006). Passion in sport: A look at determinants and affective experiences. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28(4), 454 -478. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.28.4.454
  56. Vallerand, R. J., Salvy, S. J., Mageau, G. A., Elliot, A. J., Denis, P. L., Grouzel, F. E., & Blanchard, C. (2007). On the role of passion in performance. Journal of Personality, 75(3), 505-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00447.x
  57. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, 56-75.