A Study on the Annulment Procedure of ICSID Arbitral Awards

ICSID 중재판정의 '취소절차'에 관한 고찰

  • 김용일 ((국립)한국교통대학교 국제통상학과)
  • Received : 2016.01.30
  • Accepted : 2016.02.19
  • Published : 2016.02.29

Abstract

This article examines the Annulment Procedure of ICSID Arbitration Award. Although the ICSID annulment procedure is not substantially different from arbitration procedure, it does have certain unique features. Article 52 of the Convention provides that the application for annulment must be made within 120days after the date on which the award was rendered. ICSID Arbitration Rule 50, in turn, stipulates that a request for annulment of a award must: i)be addressed in writing to the Secretary-General; ii)identify the award to which it relates; iii)indicated the date of the application; and iv)state in detail the grounds for annulment on which it is based. The grounds for annulment are limited to those in Article 52(1) of the Convention. With respect to the possibility of waiving the right to annulment in advance, commentators are divided. Some authors admit the possibility of agreements eliminating the right to request annulment. Other authors, instead, have taken the position that parties cannot waive their right to annulment in advanced because no provision in the Convention allows the parties to do so, and thus the right to request annulment is inalienable. In accordance with Article 52(4), annulment decisions must comply with the requirements for awards stipulated in Article 48. Therefore; i)the committee decide questions by majority; ii)the decision must be in writing and must be signed by the members of the committee who voted for it; iii)any member of the committee may attach his individual opinion to the award; and iv)ICSID must not publish the decision without the consent of the parties. Finally, under Article 52(4), parties are not allowed to request the interpretation, revision, or annulment of a decision on annulment. Even if the committee allegedly manifestly exceeded its powers or engaged in any conduct sanctioned by Article 52(1), the parties cannot request the annulment of the decision on annulment.

Keywords

References

  1. 강병근, ICSID 중재제도 연구, 법무부, 2006.
  2. 김상찬, "ICSID 중재판정 취소제도", 중재연구 제25권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2015.
  3. 김용일, "ICSID 중재판정의 재심제도에 관한 연구", 국제상학 제28권 제3호, 한국국제상학회, 2013.
  4. 김용일, "ICSID 중재판정의 '집행정지'에 관한 고찰", 무역상무연구 제68권, 한국무역상무학회, 2015.
  5. 박건도, "ICSID 협약상 취소제도의 성격 및 취소사유에 관한 소고: 명백한 월권 및 이유 미기재를 중심으로", 법과 정책연구 제10집 제3호, 한국법정책학회, 2010.
  6. 오원석.이기옥.김용일, "ICSID 중재의 취소제도에 관한 제 고찰", 중재연구 제24권 제4호, 한국중재학회, 2014.
  7. 이기옥, "ICSID 중재판정의 취소와 집행에 관한 연구", 성균관대학교 박사학위청구논문, 2015. 2.
  8. Alexandrov, S. A., "The Vivendi Annulment Decision and the Lessons for Future ICSID Arbitration-The Applicants Perspective" in E. Gaillard and Y. Banifatemi(eds), Annulment of ICSID Award, New York: Juris Publishing, 2004.
  9. Bishop, R. D. & Marchili, S. M., Annulment under the ICSID Convention, Oxford, 2012.
  10. Bjorklund, A. K., "The Continuing Appeal of Annulment: Lessons from Amco Asia and CEM" in T. J. Weiler(ed), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law, London: Cameron May, 2005.
  11. Born, G. B., International Commercial Arbitration: Cases and Materials, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law, 2011.
  12. Broches, A., "Observations on the Finality of ICSID Award", 6 ICSID Rev-FILJ., 1991.
  13. Broches, A., "Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States of 1965 Explanatory Notes and Survey of its Application" in A. J. van den Berg.(ed), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, Vol X V III, 1993.
  14. Caron, D. D., "Reputation and Reality in the ICSID Annulment Process: Understanding the Distinction Between Annulment and Appeal", 7 ICSID Rev-FILJ., 1992.
  15. Delaume, G. R., "The Finality of Arbitration Involving States: Recent Developments", 5(1) Journal of International Arbitration, 1989.
  16. Delaume, G. R., "Reflections on the Effectiveness of International Arbitral Awards", 12(1) Journal of International Arbitration, 1995.
  17. ICSID, History of the ICSID Convention, Vol.I, ICSID PUBLICATION, 2006.
  18. ICSID, History of the ICSID Convention, Vol. II, ICSID PUBLICATION, 2009.
  19. Jacob, K. S., "Reinvigorating ICSID with a New Mission and with Renewed Respect for Party Autonomy", 33 Virginia Journal of International Law, 1993.
  20. Koa, C. M., "The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and Dispute Resolution: Conciliating and Arbitrating with China Through the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes", 24 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 1991.
  21. Paulsson, J., "ICSID's Achievements and Prospects", ICSID Rev-FILJ., 1991.
  22. Reed, L. et al., Guide to ICSID Arbitration, Wolters Kluwer, 2011.
  23. Reisman, W. M., "Reflection on the Control Mechanism of the ICSID System" in E G aillard (ed), The Review of International Arbitral Awards, Jurist and International Arbitration Institute, 2010.
  24. Reisman, W. M., "The Breakdown of the Control Mechanism in ICSID Arbitration", Duke Law Journal 739, 1989.
  25. Schreuer, C. H. et al., The ICSID Convention: A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  26. Stevens, M., 'The Power of ICSID Ad Hoc Committees to Order Security When Granting a Stay of Enforcement' in R. Doak Bishop(ed), Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Against Sovereigns, New York: Juris Publishing, 2009.
  27. Suarez Anzorena, C. I., "Vivendi v. Argentina: on the Admissibility of Requests for Partial Annulment and the Ground of a Manifest Excess of Power" in E. Gaillard and Y. Banifatemi(eds), Annulment of ICSID Awards, New York: Juris Publishing, 2004.
  28. Verhoosel, G., "Annulment and Enforcement Review of Treaty Awards: To ICSID or Not to ICSID?" in 50 years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference, ICCA Congress Series No 14, A. J. van den Berg.(ed), Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer International Law, 2009.