DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Immunization of Mice with Recombinant Brucella abortus Organic Hydroperoxide Resistance (Ohr) Protein Protects Against a Virulent Brucella abortus 544 Infection

  • Hop, Huynh Tan (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Reyes, Alisha Wehdnesday Bernardo (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Simborio, Hannah Leah Tadeja (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Arayan, Lauren Togonon (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Min, Won Gi (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Hu Jang (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Jin Ju (Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) ;
  • Chang, Hong Hee (Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Suk (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2015.05.11
  • Accepted : 2015.10.13
  • Published : 2016.01.28

Abstract

In this study, the Brucella abortus ohr gene coding for an organic hydroperoxide resistance protein (Ohr) was cloned into a maltose fusion protein expression system (pMAL), inserted into Escherichia coli, and purified, and its immunogenicity was evaluated by western blot analysis using Brucella-positive mouse sera. The purified recombinant Ohr (rOhr) was treated with adjuvant and injected intraperitoneally into BALB/c mice. A protective immune response analysis revealed that rOhr induced a significant increase in both the IgG1 and IgG2a titers, and IgG2a reached a higher level than IgG1 after the second and third immunizations. Additionally, immunization with rOhr induced high production of IFN-γ as well as proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF, MCP-1, IL-12p70, and IL-6, but a lesser amount of IL-10, suggesting that rOhr predominantly elicited a cell-mediated immune response. In addition, immunization with rOhr caused a significantly higher degree of protection against a virulent B. abortus infection compared with a positive control group consisting of mice immunized with maltose-binding protein. These findings showed that B. abortus rOhr was able to induce both humoral and cell-mediated immunity in mice, which suggested that this recombinant protein could be a potential vaccine candidate for animal brucellosis.

Keywords

Introduction

Brucellosis is a re-emerging zoonotic disease responsible for great economic losses in animal production for food, and it represents a significant human health threat with an annual incidence of approximately 500,000 cases worldwide [2,4,20]. The etiologic agents are highly contagious to humans; an estimated aerosol dose of 10 to 100 organisms is sufficient to establish an infection [3]. Although horizontal human transmission is possible, most cases of human infection are due to exposure to infected animals or contaminated animal matter, such as uterine secretions or aborted fetuses, and consumption of unpasteurized milk and dairy food products [4,7]. A human vaccine would be useful to protect farmers, veterinarians, animal care workers, laboratory personnel, and the general population; however, no licensed vaccine is available to prevent brucellosis in humans [2]. The use of the currently available live attenuated vaccines has several drawbacks with respect to safety and is not adequate to eliminate brucellosis in any host species [8,18].

The ability of Brucella species to invade host cells is a key step in their pathogenesis, and the ability to evade host immune surveillance favors their survival and proliferation. Therefore, host resistance depends mainly on acquired cell-mediated immunity (CMI). Vaccines that can stimulate strong CMI responses would effectively control the disease [15]. During the last decades, the focus of many research studies has been on the development of safer and more effective Brucella vaccines [2].

On the other hand, subunit vaccines are being considered to be developed as effective vaccines for human brucellosis because it has already been used and is currently available against infections such as meningococcus and influenza. Additionally, different studies have evaluated surface structures and antigens of Brucella as immunopotent components, to design an efficient brucellosis subunit vaccine, including L7/L12 ribosomal protein [17], outer membrane proteins Omp16 and Omp19 [20], Omp28 [13], and CobB and AsnC proteins [7]. Consequently, we aim to particularly develop a recombinant subunit vaccine that would elicit sufficient protection in host species. A potential candidate is the organic hydroperoxide resistance (Ohr) protein, which belongs to a family of peroxiredoxins that detoxify organic peroxides (except hydrogen peroxide) and has been identified and characterized in several bacteria [5]. In our previous study, this protein displayed a strong immunoreactivity as analyzed by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) followed by western blot analysis with Brucella-infected bovine s erum [12] . In t he p resent study, the B. abortus ohr gene was cloned and expressed in a maltose fusion protein (pMAL) expression system and expressed and induced in Escherichia coli. The purified protein showed high immunogenicity without cross-reaction in immunoblotting analysis. This protein was used as a subunit vaccine against brucellosis in a mouse model, and its protective efficacy was evaluated based on the animals’ response to immunization.

 

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strain and Growth Conditions

A smooth, virulent B. abortus 544 biovar 1 strain was kindly provided by the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency in Korea, and Escherichia coli DH5α cells were purchased from Invitrogen (USA). B. abortus was routinely cultured overnight in Brucella broth (BD Biosciences, USA) at 37℃. Solid medium was made by supplementing Brucella broth with 1.5% (w/v) agar (Takara, Japan) when needed.E. coli DH5α cells were used for producing the necessary plasmid constructs. E. coli cultures were grown at 37℃ in LB broth or agar with or without 100 μg/ml of ampicillin (Sigma, USA).

Cloning, Expression, Induction, and Purification of rOhr

The B. abortus ohr gene was amplified by PCR with the following primer pairs: 5’ - AAT TC GAA TTC ATG CCA ATT CTT TAC ACG - 3’ (EcoRI site underlined) and 5’ - AGG C AAG CTT TCA GGC TAC GCT CAG GCG - 3’ (HindIII site underlined). The amplified DNA product was digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes (EcoRI and HindIII; Takara, Japan). The digested product was cloned into a pMAL vector (New England Biolabs, USA) and then transformed into E. coli DH5α host cells. Bacteria confirmed to express the fusion plasmid were cultured overnight and transferred into ampicillin-containing LB broth, and the recombinant protein was induced by adding isopropyl β- D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at a final concentration of 0.2 mM, with further incubation at 37℃ for 4 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 ×g for 10min and resuspended in column buffer (20 mM Tris HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X100, and 10% glycerol, pH 7.4), and then frozen at -70℃ and thawed three times at 4℃. The suspensions were sonicated (Bandelin Electronic, Germany) at 10,000 Hz on ice, centrifuged at 8,000 ×g for 20 min to collect the supernatant, and then loaded onto a maltose resin column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified protein was stored at -70℃.

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting

Lysates of the induced cells and the purified proteins were identified by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis as previously described [6,13]. Briefly, the purified recombinant proteins were boiled for 5 min in 2× SDS buffer (4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.004% bromophenol blue, and 0.125 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8). After electrophoresis, the separated proteins were transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Milipore, USA) in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 190 mM glycine, and 20% methanol, pH 8.3) for 60 min using a semi-dry electroblot assembly (Bio-Rad, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk (Difco, USA) for 30 min at room temperature and subsequently washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T) and then incubated with Brucella-positive or -negative mouse sera (produced from mouse immunized by virulent B. abortus, 1:1,000 dilution) in blocking buffer at 4℃ overnight. The membranes were washed with 0.05% PBS-T and incubated with horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:10,000 dilution; Sigma, USA) in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature and finally washed with 0.05% PBS-T. The proteins were detected with ECL solution (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Protection Experiment in Mice

Fifteen six-week-old female BALB/c mice (Japan SLC, Japan) were randomly allocated to three groups. Each mouse was immunized intraperitoneally with 20 μg of rOhr, 20 μg of maltose-binding protein (MBP) (positive control), or PBS (negative control) in 100 μl of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) (Sigma, USA) on weeks 0, 2, and 5. Serum samples were obtained from the tail vein of all animals on weeks 5 and 7 after the first immunization. After 2 weeks from the last immunization, mice were intraperitoneally challenged with approximately 5 × 104 CFU of B. abortus in 100 μl of PBS.

Two weeks postinfection, all mice were sacrificed, and the spleens were removed, weighed, and homogenized in PBS [13]. The homogenates were serially diluted 10-fold with PBS and plated on Brucella agar and then incubated for 3 days at 37℃. The Log10 number of CFUs for each spleen sample was calculated. Log protection was calculated as the mean Log10 CFU of the PBS group minus the Log10 CFU of the experimental group. All of the procedures described were reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Gyeongsang National University (Authorization No. GNU-130125-M0008).

Immune Response Analysis

After 5 and 7 weeks of the first immunization, blood samples were collected from the tail vein of all mice. After centrifugation at 4,000 ×g for 10 min at 4oC, the supernatants were carefully collected as serum samples. The serum titer of the IgG1 and IgG2a isotypes specific for rOhr was subsequently determined by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam, USA). The cutoff value was calculated as the mean specific OD plus the standard deviation (SD) for non-immunized mouse sera diluted 1:100. The titer was defined as the highest dilution of serum giving an OD of twice the cutoff value. The levels of IL-6, IL-10, MCP-1, IFN-γ, TNF, and IL-12p70 in the sera were determined by cytometric bead array (BD CBA Mouse Inflammation Kit, USA).

Statistical Analysis

The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA was used to statistically compare the groups. Results with p < 0.05 were considered significantly different.

 

Results

Cloning and Immunoreactivity of rOhr Protein

The B. abortus ohr gene product (423 bp) was amplified by PCR, cloned into a pMAL expression vector, and transformed into competent E. coli cells. The successfully transformed cells were grown in ampicillin-containing LB broth, and the expression of target protein was induced with 0.2 mM IPTG. The molecular masses of purified rOhr and MBP were approximately 59.15 kDa and 43.5 kDa on SDS-PAGE, respectively (Fig. 1A). The immunoreactivity of the purified rOhr was evaluated by immunoblotting, showing that purified rOhr strongly reacted with Brucella-positive serum but did not react with Brucella-negative serum (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.Immunoreactivity of B. abortus recombinant Ohr (rOhr).

Immune Response Analysis of rOhr Protein in Mice

The animal immune response was evaluated from three groups of mice immunized with rOhr, MBP, or PBS with IFA on weeks 0, 2, and 5. Blood samples collected on weeks 5 and 7 after the first immunization were processed, and the sera were analyzed to determine the IgG1 and IgG2a titers using an ELISA kit. Our results showed that at weeks 5 and 7, the IgG1 and IgG2a mean log titers of the rOhr-immunized mice were significantly higher than the MBPimmunized group (Fig. 2). Production of IgG1 and IgG2a increased approximately 1.7-fold and 1.8-fold after the second immunization, respectively. Additionally, elevated IgG1 and IgG2a were observed after the third immunization with approximately 1.75-fold and 2.1-fold increases, respectively. The results indicated that the administration of rOhr induced a strong humoral immune response.

Fig. 2.Humoral immune response elicited after immunization with rOhr.

Further information on the type of immune response was determined by measuring the concentration of cytokines from sera collected at weeks 5 and 7 after the first immunization. Immunization of mice with MBP did not significantly induce the production of any cytokines compared with the PBS-immunized group. In contrast, at 5 weeks after the first immunization, rOhr-immunized mice showed a significant increase in the production of IL-10 and TNF, but not much IFN-γ. However, 2 weeks after receiving full immunization, IL-12p70 and IFN-γ were markedly stimulated with concentrations reaching up to 3.485 pg/ml and 5.21 pg/ml, respectively. Similarly, IL-6 and IL-10 were also slightly increased, but changes in TNF and MCP-1 could not be detected (Table 1). Our results suggested that immunization with rOhr greatly induced the production of antigen-presenting cell-related cytokines and chemokines (IL-12p70, IL-6, MCP-1, TNF) as well as the Th1-related cytokine IFN-γ and the Th2-related cytokine IL-10.

Table 1.*Weeks after first vaccination. aSignificantly different from the PBS-immunized group (p < 0.05). 1Significantly different from the MBP-immunized group (p < 0.05).

Protection Efficiency of the rOhr Protein

To evaluate the host protection response, BALB/c mice were immunized with purified rOhr, MBP in IFA adjuvant, or PBS and then challenged with B. abortus administered by the intraperitoneal route. In this experiment, protection was defined as a significant reduction (p < 0.01) in the log units of bacterial load in the spleen of mice treated with the rOhr protein in comparison with the control group treated with PBS. As shown in Fig. 3B, mice immunized with rOhr had a significantly higher degree of protection than mice immunized with MBP or PBS. Moreover, the mean spleen weight of the rOhr protein-vaccinated mice was approximately 1.29-fold lower, which was significant compared with the PBS-treated group (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3.Protection against B. abortus 544 in mice vaccinated with rOhr.

 

Discussion

Brucellosis causes great economic loss and significant health risks to humans. Because the incidence of human brucellosis is strongly dependent on the prevalence of the disease in animals, disease prevention in humans also depends predominantly on the control of the disease in animals, and vaccination in conjunction with test and slaughter programs is the most important method of control in animals [7,8]. There is no currently available licensed vaccine for human brucellosis. Although control and eradication of animal brucellosis have been achieved in some areas owing to intense regional efforts, it remains as an important disease in many parts of the globe [2,8].

Animal vaccination is a critical factor for the control and prevention of animal and human brucellosis, but the currently available live attenuated vaccines have several safety-related problems, including reversion to virulence, the potential to cause human infection, abortions in pregnant animals, and shedding in milk. These live vaccines also possess a limited ability to prevent infection, and seroconversion after exposure, and may interfere with disease diagnosis due to a high antibody titer [2,12,19]. Therefore, the development of a new, safe, and improved vaccine is a challenge to the scientific community. Much more attention has been focused on screening Brucella protective antigens as subunit vaccine candidates because they are completely inert and have a definite composition, controllable production, and high homogeneity as compared with live attenuated vaccines [7]. Furthermore, subunit vaccines can induce an immune response to a single protein, which could improve serological diagnostic methods by allowing the design of diagnostic tools that can differentiate vaccinated animals from naturally infected animals. Accordingly, several protein antigens from Brucella have been examined as recombinant protein vaccines in mouse models and have shown a significant protective immune response [2].

Organic hydroperoxide resistance protein is involved in the bacterial response to oxidative stress and has been known to protect B. abortus 2308 from organic hydroperoxide stress in in vitro assays, but it is not required for virulence of the wild type in cultured murine macrophages or experimentally infected mice [5]. The importance of this protein for virulence both in macrophages and mice has been reported in Francisella, which further implies that its importance for pathogenesis is conserved in multiple Francisella species [14]. In our previous study, B. abortus Ohr showed potential as a potent immunogenic antigen as revealed by 2DE and western blot assays using B. abortus-infected bovine serum [12]. Consequently, we constructed pMAL-Ohr to further investigate the efficacy of rOhr in inducing an immune response against Brucella infection in a mouse model.

Innate immunity plays an important role during B. abortus infection, helping to decrease the initial number of bacteria and influencing the development of a protective adaptive immunity. Furthermore, the chronic nature of the disease caused by this pathogen requires an effective adaptive immune response, and although several components of the immune system contribute to protect against intracellular pathogens, it is well documented that the cell-mediated immune response plays a major role in the mediated immune protection against Brucella and other intracellular pathogens [8,20]. Host immunity involves cell-mediated (Th1) and humoral (Th2) immunities; the former is characterized by the production of IgG2a antibodies, whereas the latter is characterized by the production of IgG1 antibodies [9,16,20]. Interestingly, significant increased anti-Ohr IgG1 and IgG2a titers were observed, which suggested the induction of both humoral and cell-mediated protective immune responses. However, IgG2a production was higher than that of IgG1, which indicated the induction of a predominantly Th1 response. Immunization with rOhr conferred protection against infection in BALB/c mice as confirmed by the significant reduction of the bacterial load in the spleen (1.29 protection unit). Because the rOhr protein conferred significant protection against a virulent B. abortus infection in BALB/c mice specifically by a dominant Th1-cell immunity, this protein can be considered as a potential candidate vaccine for protection against brucellosis.

In the pathogenesis of brucellosis, cytokines play a critical role in the immune response, which includes mediating innate and adaptive immunity and directing the immune response among immune-associated cells [11]. The cytokine content in the serum reflects cytokine production and secretion from spleen cells [1]; hence, we analyzed the cytokine content in the serum of mice. In the present study, the levels of different cytokines were measured, and a significant increases in the cytokines TNF, IFN-γ, and IL-10 and the chemokine MCP-1 in the sera were observed, which suggests further protection against brucellosis predominantly via Th1 immunity. At 5 weeks after the first immunization (which consisted of two immunizations with the recombinant protein), a significant increase in TNF (p < 0.01) was observed, and this level continued to increase significantly 2 weeks after the third immunization. This cytokine is one of the key players in brucellosis and is believed to be an important mediator of acquired cell-mediated resistance, maximizing the phagocytic role of macrophages and mediating resistance to primary and secondary B. abortus infections [11,22]. Additionally, mutations disturbing TNF-α generation in mice influenced clearance and favored Brucella replication [10]. Other cytokines, such as IFN-γ, IL-10, and MCP-1, were observed to increase significantly 2 weeks after the third immunization. IFN-γ is generally the major essential effector cytokine that activates the bactericidal function of macrophages and inhibits microbial replication [11,20]. IL-10 is an immunoregulatory cytokine that acts on antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages to inhibit the development of the cell-mediated response in order to prevent further tissue damage [21]. Interestingly, the level of IL-10 in the present study was distinctly elevated (23.66-fold increase), which might support the presence of a humoral-mediated response. The chemokine MCP-1 has been implicated in human and mouse host immunity to Brucella.

In conclusion, our results indicate that immunogenic Ohr could be a potential protective antigen for the development of subunit vaccines against brucellosis, since it elicits both humoral and cellular immune responses and confers protection against virulent B. abortus challenge. Further studies will be focused on the development of efficient adjuvant or antigen delivery systems to further evaluate the protective immunity of rOhr alone or in combination with other antigens.

References

  1. Athanassakis I, Iconomidou B. 1996. Cytokine production in the serum and spleen of mice from day 6 to 14 of gestation: cytokines/placenta/spleen/serum. Dev. Immunol. 4: 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1155/1995/42412
  2. Avila-Calderon ED, Lopez-Merino A, Sriranganathan N, Boyle SM. 2013. A history of the development of Brucella vaccines. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/743509
  3. Bossi P, Tegnell A, Baka A, Van Loock F, Hendricks J, Werner A, et al. 2004. Bichat guidelines for the clinical management of brucellosis and bioterrorism-related brucellosis. Euro Surveill. 9: 15-16.
  4. Carvalho NAV, Mol JPS, Xavier MN, Paixão TA, Lage AP, Santos RL. 2010. Pathogenesis of bovine brucellosis. Vet. J. 184: 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.04.010
  5. Caswell CC, Baumgartner JE, Martin DW, Roop II RM. 2012. Characterization of the organic hydroperoxide resistance system of Brucella abortus 2308. J. Bacteriol. 194: 5065-5072. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00873-12
  6. Dubray G, Bézard G. 1980. Isolation of three Brucella abortus cell-wall antigens protective in murine experimental brucellosis. Ann. Rech. Vet. 11: 367-373.
  7. Fu S, Xu J, Li X, Xie Y, Qui Y, Du X, et al. 2012. Immunization of mice with recombinant protein CobB or AsnC confers protection against Brucella abortus infection. PLoS One7: 1-5.
  8. Gomez G, Adams LG, Rice-Ficht A, Ficht TA. 2013. Host- Brucella interactions and the Brucella genome as tools for subunit antigen discovery and immunization against brucellosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 3: 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2013.00017
  9. González-Smith A, Vemulapalli R, Andrews E, Oñate A. 2006. Evaluation of Brucella abortus DNA vaccine by expression of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase antigen fused to IL-2. Immunobiology 211: 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2005.09.004
  10. Grilló MJ, Blasco JM, Gorvel JP, Moriyón I, Moreno E. 2012. What have we learned from brucellosis in the mouse model? Vet. Res. 43: 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-43-29
  11. Ko J, Splitter GA. 2003. Molecular host-pathogen interaction in brucellosis: current understanding and future approaches to vaccine development for mice and humans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.1.65-78.2003
  12. Lee JJ, Simborio HL, Reyes AW, Kim DG, Hop HT, Min W, et al. 2015. Immunoproteomic identification of immunodominant antigens independent of the time of infection in Brucella abortus 2308-challenged cattle. Vet. Res. 46: 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0147-6
  13. Lim JJ, Kim DH, Lee JJ, Kim DG, Min W, Lee HJ, et al. 2012. Protective effects of recombinant Brucella abortus Omp28 against infection with a virulent strain of Brucella abortus 544 in mice. J. Vet. Sci. 13: 287-292. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2012.13.3.287
  14. Llewellyn AC, Jones CL, Napier BA, Bina JE, Weiss DS. 2011. Macrophage replication screen identifies a novel Francisella hydroperoxide resistance protein involved in virulence. PLoS One 6: e24201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024201
  15. Luo D, Ni B, Li P, Shi W, Zhang S, Han Y, et al. 2006. Protective immunity elicited by a divalent DNA vaccine encoding both the L7/L12 and Omp16 genes of Brucella abortus in BALB/c mice. Infect. Immun. 74: 2734-2741. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.74.5.2734-2741.2006
  16. Maecker HT, Do MS, Levy S. 1998. CD81 on B cells promotes interleukin 4 secretion and antibody production during T helper type 2 immune responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95: 2458-2462. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.5.2458
  17. Oliveira SC, Splitter GA. 1996. Immunization of mice with recombinant L7/L12 ribosomal protein confers protection against Brucella abortus infection. Vaccine 14: 959-962 https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-410X(96)00018-7
  18. Oliveira SC, Macedo GC, Almeida LA, Oliveira FS, Oñate A, Cassataro J, Giambartolomei GH. 2010. Recent advances in understanding immunity against brucellosis: application for vaccine development. Open Vet. Sci. J. 4: 102-108. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874318801004010102
  19. Olsen SC. 2013. Recent developments in livestock and wildlife brucellosis vaccination. Rev. Sci. Tech. 32: 207-217. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.32.1.2201
  20. Pasquevich KA, Estein SM, García Samartino C, Zwerdling A, Coria LM, Barrionuevo P, et al. 2009. Immunization with recombinant Brucella species outer membrane protein Omp16 or Omp19 in adjuvant induces specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as systemic and oral protection against Brucella abortus infection. Infect. Immun. 77: 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01151-08
  21. Xavier MN, Winter MG, Spees AM, Nguyen K, Atluri VL, Silva TM, et al. 2013. CD4+ T cell-derived IL-10 promotes Brucella abortus persistence via modulation of macrophage function. PLoS Pathog. 9: e1003454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003454
  22. Zhan Y, Cheers C. 1993. Endogenous gamma interferon mediates resistance to Brucella abortus infection. Infect. Immun. 61: 4899-4901.

Cited by

  1. Immunotoxic effect of thiamethoxam in immunized mice with Brucella abortus cultural filtrate antigen vol.9, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.1407-1412
  2. Development of new generation of vaccines for Brucella abortus vol.4, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01079
  3. Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines for Brucellosis: Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles-Adsorbed Antigens Induce Cross Protective Response in Mice vol.15, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s249942
  4. Brucella antigens (BhuA, 7α-HSDH, FliC) in poly I:C adjuvant as potential vaccine candidates against brucellosis vol.500, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2021.113172