DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On-line Measurement of the Surface Area Concentration of Aerosols in Yokohama, Japan, using the Diffusion Charging Method

  • Hatoya, Kazuki (Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University) ;
  • Okuda, Tomoaki (Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University) ;
  • Funato, Koji (Tokyo Dylec Corp.) ;
  • Inoue, Kozo (Tokyo Dylec Corp.)
  • Received : 2015.10.28
  • Accepted : 2015.12.26
  • Published : 2016.03.31

Abstract

Numerous researchers have proposed that surface area is a more appropriate indicator than mass for evaluating pulmonary inflammatory responses caused by exposure to fine and ultrafine particles. In this study, measurements of surface area concentrations of aerosols were conducted in Yokohama, Japan, using the diffusion charging method. $PM_{2.5}$ mass concentration and black carbon concentration in $PM_{2.5}$ were also measured. The 24-hour continuous measurement campaigns were conducted 39 times from March to November, 2014. The surface area concentration was more closely correlated with the black carbon concentration than with the $PM_{2.5}$ mass concentration. It is considered that the abundance of black carbon particles significantly affects the surface area concentration of $PM_{2.5}$. The strength of the correlation between the surface area and black carbon concentrations varied considerably among the measurement campaigns. A relatively weaker afternoon correlation was observed compared with the other time zones (morning, evening, and night). We consider that these phenomena are due to the transportation/formation of the particles other than black carbon that affects surface area concentration and/or the variation of the surface condition of the black carbon particles.

Keywords

References

  1. Albuquerque, P.C., Gomes, J.F., Bordado, J.C. (2012) Assessment of exposure to airborne ultrafine particles in the urban environment of Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 62, 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.658957
  2. Asbach, C., Fissan, H., Stahlmecke, B., Kuhlbusch, T.A.J., Pui, D.Y.H. (2009) Conceptual limitations and extensions of lung-deposited Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM). Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9479-8
  3. Bau, S., Witschger, O., Gensdarmes, F., Rastoix, O., Thomas, D. (2010) A TEM-based method as an alternative to the BET method for measuring off-line the specific surface area of nanoaerosols. Powder Technology 200, 190-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.02.023
  4. Bau, S., Witschger, O., Gensdarmes, F., Thomas, D. (2012) Evaluating three direct-reading instruments based on diffusion charging to measure surface area concentrations in polydisperse nanoaerosols in molecular and transition regimes. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 14, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1217-6
  5. Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H., Teller, E. (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. Journal of American Chemical Society 60, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023
  6. Cai, J., Yan, B., Ross, J., Zhang, D., Kinney, P.L., Perzanowski, M.S., Jung, K.H., Miller, R., Chillrud, S.N. (2014) Validation of microAeth$^{(R)}$ as a black carbon monitor for fixed-site measurement and optimization for personal exposure characterization. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 14, 1-9.
  7. Cheng, Y.H., Lin, M.H. (2013) Real-time performance of the microAeth$^{(R)}$ AE51 and the effects of aerosol loading on its measurement results at a traffic site. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 13, 1853-1863.
  8. China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A.C., Dubey, M.K. (2013) Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire carbonaceous particles. Nature Communications 4, 2122. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122
  9. China, S., Salvadori, N., Mazzoleni, C. (2014) Effect of traffic and driving characteristics on morphology of atmospheric soot particles at freeway on-ramps. Environmental Science & Technology 48, 3128-3135. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405178n
  10. Donaldson, K., Li, X.Y., MacNee, W. (1998) Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury. Journal of Aerosol Science 29, 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)00464-3
  11. Draxler, R.R., Rolph, G.D. (2015) HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website (http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php). NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.
  12. Ferrero, L., Mocnik, G., Ferrini, B.S., Perrone, M.G., Sangiorgi, G., Bolzacchini, E. (2011) Vertical profiles of aerosol absorption coefficient from micro-Aethalometer data and Mie calculation over Milan. Science of the Total Environment 409, 2824-2837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.022
  13. Fissan, H., Neumann, S., Trampe, A., Pui, D.Y.H., Shin, W.G. (2007) Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposited nanoparticle surface area. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9, 53-59.
  14. Gaggeler, H.W., Baltensperger, U., Emmenegger, M., Jost, D.T., Schmidt-Ott, A., Haller, P., Hofmann, M. (1989) The epiphaniometer, a new device for continuous aerosol monitoring. Journal of Aerosol Science 20, 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(89)90101-8
  15. Giechaskiel, B., Alfoldy, B., Drossinos, Y. (2009) A metric for health effects studies of diesel exhaust particles. Journal of Aerosol Science 40, 639-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.04.008
  16. Heitbrink, W.A., Evans, D.E., Ku, B.K., Maynard, A.D., Slavin, T.J., Peters, T.M. (2009) Relationships among particle number, surface area, and respirable mass concentrations in automotive engine manufacturing. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 6, 19-31.
  17. International Commission on Radiological Protection (1994) Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publication 66. Annals of the ICRP 24 (1-3):1-482 https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6453(94)90029-9
  18. Japan Meteorological Agency (2015) Meteorological Data Archives. http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/index.php (in Japanese)
  19. Jung, H., Kittelson, D.B. (2005) Characterization of aerosol surface instruments in transition regime. Aerosol Science and Technology 39, 902-911. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500295701
  20. Kaminski, H., Kuhlbusch, T.A.J., Rath, S., Gotz, U., Sprenger, M., Wels, D., Polloczek, J., Bachmann, V., Dziurowitz, N., Kiesling, H.-J., Schwiegelshohn, A., Monz, C., Dahmann, D., Asbach, C. (2013) Comparability of mobility particle sizers and diffusion chargers, Journal of Aerosol Science 57, 156-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.10.008
  21. Kittelson, D.B., Watts, W.F., Savstrom, J.C., Johnson, J.P. (2005) Influence of a catalytic stripper on the response of real time aerosol instruments to diesel exhaust aerosol. Journal of Aerosol Science 36, 1089-1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.11.021
  22. Ku, B.K. (2010) Determination of the ratio of diffusion charging-based surface area to geometric surface area for spherical particles in the size range of 100-900 nm. Journal of Aerosol Science 41, 835-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.05.008
  23. Kulkarni, P., Baron, P.A., Willeke, K. (2011) Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
  24. Leavey, A., Fang, J., Sahu, M., Biswas, P. (2013) Comparison of measured particle lung-deposited surface area concentrations by an Aerotrak 9000 using size distribution measurements for a range of combustion aerosols, Aerosol Science and Technology 47, 966-978. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.803018
  25. LeBouf, R.F., Ku, B.K., Chen, B.T., Frazer, D.G., Cumpston, J.L., Stefaniak, A.B. (2011) Measuring surface area of airborne titanium dioxide powder agglomerates: relationships between gas adsorption, diffusion and mobility-based methods. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13, 7029-7039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0616-4
  26. Mokhtar, M.-A., Jayaratne, R., Morawska, L., Mazaheri, M., Surawski, N., Buonanno, G. (2013) NSAM-derived total surface area versus SMPS-derived "mobility equivalent" surface area for different environmentally relevant aerosols. Journal of Aerosol Science 66, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.08.003
  27. Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., Adachi, K. (2014) Identification by single-particle soot photometer of black carbon particles attached to other particles: Laboratory experiments and ground observations in Tokyo. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 119, 1031-1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020655
  28. Nakanishi, J. (2011) Risk Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials "Approaches" - Overview of Approaches and Results - Final Report issued on August 17, 2011 Revised on February 22, 2013 NEDO Project (P06041) "Research and Development of Nanoparticle Characterization Methods."
  29. Nguyen, T.H., Ball, W.P. (2006) Absorption and adsorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants to diesel and hexane soot. Environmental Science & Technology 40, 2958-2964. https://doi.org/10.1021/es052121a
  30. Ntziachristos, L., Giechaskiel, B., Ristimaki, J., Keskinen, J. (2004) Use of a corona charger for the characterisation of automotive exhaust aerosol. Journal of Aerosol Science 35, 943-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.005
  31. Ntziachristos, L., Ning, Z., Geller, M.D., Sioutas, C. (2007a) Particle concentration and characteristics near a major freeway with heavy-duty diesel traffic. Environmental Science & Technology 41, 2223-2230. https://doi.org/10.1021/es062590s
  32. Ntziachristos, L., Polidori, A., Phuleria, H., Geller, M.D., Sioutas, C. (2007b) Application of a diffusion charger for the measurement of particle surface concentration in different environments. Aerosol Science and Technology 41, 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701272020
  33. Oberdorster, G. (2001) Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 74, 1-8.
  34. Oberdorster, G., Finkelstein, J.N., Johnston, C., Gelein, R., Cox, C., Baggs, R., Elder, A.C.P. (2000) Acute pulmonary effects of ultrafine particles in rats and mice. Research Report Health Effects Institute 96, 5-74.
  35. Oberdorster, G., Gelein, R.M., Ferin, J., Weiss, B. (1995) Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: involvement of ultrafine particles?. Inhalation Toxicology 7, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958379509014275
  36. Oberdorster, G., Oberdorster, E., Oberdorster, J. (2005) Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health Perspectives 113, 823-839. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7339
  37. Okuda, T. (2013) Measurement of the specific surface area and particle size distribution of atmospheric aerosol reference materials. Atmospheric Environment 75, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.033
  38. Okuda, T., Isobe, R., Nagai, Y., Okahisa, S., Funato, K., Inoue, K. (2015) Development of a high-volume PM2.5 particle sampler using impactor and cyclone techniques. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 15, 759-767.
  39. Okuda, T., Nakao, S., Katsuno, M., Tanaka, S. (2007) Source identification of nickel in TSP and $PM_{2.5}$ in Tokyo, Japan, Atmospheric Environment 41, 7642-7648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.050
  40. Polidori, A., Hu, S., Biswas, S., Delfino, R.J., Sioutas, C. (2008) Real-time characterization of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient aerosols and from motor-vehicle exhaust. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8, 1277-1291. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1277-2008
  41. Rolph, G.D. (2015) Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem (READY) Website (http://ready.arl.noaa.gov). NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.
  42. Rule, A.M., Geyh, A.S., Ramos-Bonilla, J.P., Mihalic, J.N., Margulies, J.D., Polyak, L.M., Kesavan, J., Breysse, P.N. (2010) Design and characterization of a sequential cyclone system for the collection of bulk particulate matter. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 12, 1807-1814. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0em00034e
  43. Sasaki, K., Sakamoto, K. (2006) Diurnal characteristics of suspended particulate matter and PM2.5 in the urban and suburban atmosphere of the Kanto Plain, Japan. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 171, 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-9011-z
  44. Shin, W.G., Pui, D.Y.H., Fissan, H., Neumann, S., Trampe, A. (2007) Calibration and numerical simulation of Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (TSI Model 3550 NSAM). Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9, 61-69.
  45. TSI Incorporated (2010) Measuring Nanoparticle Exposure, Application Note NSAM-001.
  46. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Notices.
  47. Vincent, J.H. (ed) (1999) Particle size-selective sampling for particulate air contaminants. American Conference for Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Cincinnati, OH.
  48. Velasco, E., Siegmann, P., Siegmann, H.C. (2004) Exploratory study of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different environments of Mexico City. Atmospheric Environment 38, 4957-4968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.020
  49. Whitby, K.T. (1978) The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosols. Atmospheric Environment 12, 135-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90196-8
  50. World Health Organization (2005). WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide Global update 2005 Summary of risk assessment. WHO press, Geneva.
  51. Yue, D.L., Hu, M., Wang, Z.B., Wen, M.T., Guo, S., Zhong, L.J., Wiedensohler, A., Zhang, Y.H. (2013) Comparison of particle number size distributions and new particle formation between the urban and rural sites in the PRD region, China. Atmospheric Environment 76, 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.018

Cited by

  1. Monthly and Diurnal Variation of the Concentrations of Aerosol Surface Area in Fukuoka, Japan, Measured by Diffusion Charging Method vol.8, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070114
  2. Factors Controlling the Variation of Aerosol Surface Area Concentrations Measured by a Diffusion Charger in Fukuoka, Japan vol.7, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7030033
  3. A parameterization of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> for mass-based aerosol models: improvement of particulate nitrate prediction vol.18, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-673-2018
  4. Improvement of a High-volume Aerosol Particle Sampler for Collecting Submicron Particles through the Combined Use of a Cyclone with a Smoothened Inner Wall and a Circular Cone Attachment vol.11, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.131
  5. Determination of total and lung-deposited particle surface area concentrations, in central Athens, Greece vol.192, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08569-8
  6. On the charged aerosols generated by atmospheric pressure non‐equilibrium plasma vol.6, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1049/hve2.12036