DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Foreign Body Reaction after Implantation of a Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion

  • Seo, Jun-Yeong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Jeju National University) ;
  • Ha, Kee-Yong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hoon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Ahn, Joo-Hyun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2014.06.09
  • 심사 : 2014.10.22
  • 발행 : 2016.11.01

초록

The device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) is a dynamic implant that consists of a silicone bumper enveloped by a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fiber sack. Silicone and PET were used because of their biological inertness, but repetitive motion of the spine can cause wear on the implant nonetheless. The purpose of this study is to report a case of foreign body reaction (FBR) against a DIAM. A 72-year-old female patient presented with lower back pain and both legs radiating pain. She had undergone DIAM implantation at L4-5 for spinal stenosis 5 years previously. The intervertebral disc space of L4-5, where the DIAM was inserted, had collapsed and degenerative scoliosis had developed due to left-side collapse. MRI showed L3-4 thecal sac compression and left L4-5 foraminal stenosis. The patient underwent removal of the DIAM and instrumented fusion from L3 to L5. During surgery, fluid and granulation tissue were evident around the DIAM. Histopathology showed scattered wear debris from the DIAM causing chronic inflammation due to the resulting FBR. A FBR due to wear debris of a DIAM can induce a hypersensitivity reaction and bone resorption around the implant, causing it to loosen.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akhaddar A, Boulahroud O, Naama O, Al-Bouzidi A, Boucetta M : Paraspinal textiloma after posterior lumbar surgery : a wolf in sheep's clothing. World Neurosurg 77 : 375-380, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.017
  2. Anderson JM : Inflammatory response to implants. ASAIO Trans 34 : 101-107, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002480-198804000-00005
  3. Anderson JM : Multinucleated giant cells. Curr Opin Hematol 7 : 40-47, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00062752-200001000-00008
  4. Cunningham BW, Hallab NJ, Hu N, McAfee PC : Epidural application of spinal instrumentation particulate wear debris : a comprehensive evaluation of neurotoxicity using an in vivo animal model. J Neurosurg Spine 19 : 336-350, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.5.SPINE13166
  5. Daniel J, Holland J, Quigley L, Sprague S, Bhandari M : Pseudotumors associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94 : 86-93, 2012 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01612
  6. Ha KY, Seo JY, Kwon SE, Son IN, Kim KW, Kim YH : Posterior dynamic stabilization in the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis : validity of its rationale. J Neurosurg Spine 18 : 24-31, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12392
  7. Jerosch J, Moursi MG : Foreign body reaction due to polyethylene's wear after implantation of an interspinal segment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128 : 1-4, 2008
  8. Kim DH, Albert TJ : Interspinous process spacers. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15 : 200-207, 2007 https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200704000-00003
  9. Potter EH, Rohrich RJ, Bolden KM : The role of silicone granulomas in recurrent capsular contracture : a review of the literature and an approach to management. Plast Reconstr Surg 131 : 888e-895e, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd642
  10. Rodriguez A, Meyerson H, Anderson JM : Quantitative in vivo cytokine analysis at synthetic biomaterial implant sites. J Biomed Mater Res A 89 : 152-159, 2009

피인용 문헌

  1. Intruding implements: a pictorial review of retained surgical foreign objects in neuroradiology vol.10, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0817-4