Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and assessment of water management resilience of mid-small scale tributaries

지류 중소하천의 물관리 탄력성 평가지수 개발 및 평가

  • 박정은 (K-water연구원 수자원연구소) ;
  • 이을래 (K-water연구원 수자원연구소) ;
  • 임광섭 (K-water연구원 수자원연구소)
  • Received : 2015.10.28
  • Accepted : 2015.12.03
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Water Management Resilience Index (WMRI) was developed as a policy measure of adaptability to withstand water stresses and to set up water management strategies mainly in mid-small scale tributaries, and then evaluated on 117 sub-basins in South Korea. The index consists of 3 sub-indices such as vulnerability, robustness and redundancy sub-indices, each including indicators of 3 sectors: water use, flood mitigation, and river environment. Total number of indicators selected for the index was 31. Taking into account the stream order and control capability of river flow discharge, sub-basins were categorized into 3: 1 for mainstreams of lower large dams, 2 and 3 for tributaries, respectively without and with flow discharge regulation. As a result of the evaluation, resilience index scores in Category 2 and 3 are much lower than that of Category 1, especially with very poor score of redundancy. Although there was no significant difference between mainstream and tributaries in vulnerability and robustness sub-indices, results of redundancy sub-index in tributaries were lower than those in mainstream. Thus, it is conceived that the variety of water management schemes should be considered to improve their resilience in the face of future uncertainty. Addressing comprehensive stability of river basin against internal and external impacts, WMRI in this study can also be used for the prioritization of water management plans.

지류 중소하천의 미래 물관리 정책방향을 수립하기 위한 자료로, 물관리 탄력성 지수를 개발하고 이를 117개 중권역에 적용하였다. 물관리 탄력성 지수는 취약성, 견고성, 다양성의 부지수로 구성하였으며, 각 부지수는 다시 이수, 치수, 하천환경 분야의 지표들로 총 31개의 지표항목으로 구성하였다. 중권역은 다목적댐 하류 본류유역(범주 1), 용수공급 및 유량조절이 불가능한 지류(범주 2)와 가능한 지류(범주 3)로 분류하여 적용한 결과, 지류 중소하천에서의 물관리 탄력성, 특히 이수 및 치수분야의 다양성이 본류에 비해 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 취약성과 견고성에 있어서는 본류와 지류가 큰 차이를 보이지 않았으나 다양성에서 지류가 낮은 값을 나타내었다. 따라서 지류 중소하천의 다양성을 높이는 방향으로 물관리 정책의 수립이 필요하다. 본 연구에서 개발된 물관리 탄력성 지수는 내외부 충격에 대한 안정성을 종합적으로 제시하여 수자원 정책 및 계획의 우선지역 선정 등에 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Asian Development Bank (2013). Asian Water Development Outlook 2013: Measuring Water Security in Asia and the Pacific. Mandaluyong City, Philippines.
  2. Choi, D.J., Park, D.H., and Kim, S.M. (2009). "Development of Water Policy Indicators : Water Use Indicators." Journal of Wetlands Research, Korean Wetlands Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 153-160.
  3. Esty, D.C., Levy, M.A., Srebotnjak, T., and de Sherbinin, A. (2005). 2005 Environmental Substantiality Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, CT.
  4. Garriga, R.G., and Foguet, A.P. (2010). "Improved Methods to Calculate a Water Poverty Index at Local Scale." Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 11, pp. 1287-1298. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000255
  5. Kang, M.G., and Lee, G.M. (2006). "Development of Assessment Index for Water Resources Sustainability and Weights Evaluation of its Components." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 59-68. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.1.059
  6. Kang, M.G., Lee, K.M., Ko, I.H., and Jeong, C.Y. (2008). "Development of a Integrated Indicator System for Evaluating the State of Watershed Management in the Context of River Basin Management Using Factor Analysis." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 277-291. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2008.41.3.277
  7. Lee, D., Choi, S.J., and Moon, J.W. (2013). "Development of Integrated Water Resources Evaluation Index." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 1017-1028. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.10.1017
  8. Lim, K.S., Choi, S.J., Lee, D.R., and Moon, J.W. (2010). "Development of Flood Risk Index Using Casual Relationships of Flood Indicators." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, KSCE, Vol. 30 No. 1B, pp. 61-70.
  9. MCT (Ministry of Construction and Transportation). (2002). 2001 Drought Record Monitoring Report.
  10. ME (Ministry of Environment). (2014a). 2013 Statistics of Waterworks.
  11. ME (Ministry of Environment). (2014b). 2013 Statistics of Sewerage.
  12. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs). (2007-2011). Assessment, Estimation and Water Securing Measurement of Instream Flow Considering Natural and Social Improvement.
  13. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs). (2011). National Water Resources Plan(2011-2020).
  14. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs) and K-water. (2012). Report on National Monitoring of River Basins.
  15. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., and Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper, OECD, Statistics Directorate, Paris.
  16. NEMA (National Emergency Management Agency). (2005-2014). Yearbook of Natural Disaster.
  17. NEMA (National Emergency Management Agency). (2009). Performance Report for Overcoming 2008-2009 Drought.
  18. OECD. (2014). The Goverance of Water Regulators : OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. OECD Publishing.
  19. OECD. (2015). Stakeholder Engagement for Inclusive Water Goverance, OECD Studies for Water. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  20. Park, J.E., Kim, J., Kim, H.S., and Koh, D.K.. (2013). "Resilience, Resilient Water Management and Water Security-1. Concept of Resilience and Appearance of Resilient Water Management." Water for Future, KWRA, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 55-64.
  21. Razali, N.M., and Wah, Y.B. (2011). "Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests." Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 21-33.
  22. Singh, R.P., Nath, S., Prasad, S.C., and Nema, A.K. (2008). "Selection of Suitable Aggregation Function for Estimation of Aggregate Pollution Index for River Ganges in India." Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 5, pp. 451-455. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:5(451)
  23. Sullivan, C.A., Meigh, J.R., Fediw, T. (2002). Developing and Testing the Water Poverty Index: Phase I Final Report. Report to Department for International Development. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, U.K.
  24. Wang, C.H., Blackmore, J.M., Wang, X., Yum, K.K., Zhou, M., Diaper, C., McGregor, G.B., and Anticev, J. (2009). Overview of Resilience Concepts, with Application to Water Resources Systems. eWater CRC Technical Report, eWater CRC, Canberra, pp. 3-11.
  25. Yun, H.Y. (1999). Development and Application of Environmental Indicators of Incheon. Incheon Development Institute. pp. 1-51.