DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Resident Involvement Analysis of New Town Landscape Architecture Construction - Focused on the Gyeonggi GwangGyo District -

택지개발지구 조경공사의 주민관여 분석 - 경기도 광교지구를 중심으로 -

  • Oh, Jeong-Hak (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Gyeonggi Urban Innovation Corporation)
  • Received : 2016.09.05
  • Accepted : 2016.12.03
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve interaction with the construction subject by analyzing the contents and contents of users' involvement in landscaping works. For this purpose, this study selected the Gwanggyo Residential Land Development District Public Landscape Project in Suwon, Gyeonggi Province. For four years before and after the completion, the opinions of tenants were used as research data. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses of 412 complaints received by the project implementation office and local government were conducted. As a result, first, the main purpose of suggesting opinions was 'demanding and expressing complaints', and there were many 'parks' and 'rivers'. In terms of content, "quality" was the most pointed out, but many kinds of trees, such as tree planting, ecological river construction, and pavement construction were also mentioned. Second, the extraction of key words from content analysis was the most common method. Followed by 'additional foodstuff' and 'moving to the toilet and management building'. Much of the point of view about dead wood has continued to be conspicuous in the process of waiting to be dealt with at the time of transplanting. Third, the validity of the contents of the complaints was evaluated as a five - point scale. Therefore, the opinions raised were unreasonable, but overall, there were more complaints with certain objectivity.

본 연구는 조경공사의 주민관여방식과 내용을 분석하여 공사 주체와의 상호작용 향상을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 경기도 수원의 광교택지개발지구 공공조경공사를 연구대상으로 삼았다. 준공 전후 약 4년간 입주자들의 조경 관련 의견이 연구자료로 활용되었다. 사업시행처와 지자체로 접수된 412건의 민원에 대한 질적분석과 양적분석을 하였다. 그 결과, 첫째, 의견제기의 주목적은 '불만표출 및 개선요구'에 있었고, 그 대상은 '공원'과 '하천'이 많았다. 내용적으로는 '품질'을 가장 많이 지적하였는데, 공종별로는 수목식재공사, 생태하천공사, 포장공사가 많이 언급되었다. 둘째, 내용분석으로 핵심어를 추출한 결과, '고사목 처리'가 가장 많았다. 그 다음은 '추가 식재', '화장실 관리동 이전'의 순이었다. 고사목에 대한 많은 지적은 이식가능시기에 한꺼번에 처리하기 위해 기다리는 과정에서 계속 눈에 띈 탓이 컸다. 셋째, 민원내용의 타당성을 5점 척도로 평가한 결과, 중간값 이상으로 나타났다. 따라서 제기된 의견들은 무리한 요구도 있었지만, 전체적으로는 일정한 객관성을 가진 민원이 더 많은 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, S. H., M. H. Lee, H. K. Kim, I. H. Kim, S. H. and J. H. Oh(2013) An analysis of the characteristics of the civil complaints occurred to the landscape architecture project in apartment complex. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(5): 78-90. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.5.078
  2. Chun, H. S. and Y. R. Kim(2009) A study on civil petitions of residents in Newtown Projects the case of Eunpyeong Newtown Project in Seoul. Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea 7(1): 105-120.
  3. Gyeonggi Province(2016) '2016 Consulting Audit Report of Kyeonggi Urban Innovation. Gyeonggi Urban Innovation.
  4. Hong, Y. S. and J. M. Park(2016) A study on the post-evaluation of landscape design competition based on ground theory. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(5): 92-102. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.5.092
  5. Jeong, H. Y.(2001) A Theory of Planning. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  6. Jeong, J. M.(2015) A study on user's interest and needs of landscape architecture construction process -Focused on the GwangGyo housing site development district. Journal of Korean Society for People Plants and Environment 18(2): 143-150.. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2015.18.2.143
  7. Kim, H. R. and S. H. Cho(2015) Comparative analysis of the types and characteristics of urban parks by residents participation between Korea and Japan. Journal of Korea Planning Association 50(6): 127-144. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2015.10.50.6.127
  8. Kim, S. K.(2001) Community participatory neighborhood park design. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 29(3): 61-69.
  9. Kim, Y. G., J. S. Sung, S. M. Cho and K. M. Lee(2003) Community participatory small park design. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(1): 78-89.
  10. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture(2014) Korean Landscape Architectural Standard Specification.
  11. Lee, S. S. and K. S. Choi(1994) A study on the estimate the probable period of the planting work in consideration of weather factor. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 21(4): 70-82.
  12. Lee, W. K., S. H. Jung and N. S. Ji(2013) Types and characteristics of civil complaints on urban redevelopment projects of Incheon. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association 26(1): 241-265.
  13. Lee, C. H.(2003) The analysis on retailer's reaction on the street tree in front of store. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 7(3): 9-16.
  14. Park, C. I.(2005) Study on post-occupation evaluation of neighborhood parks for improving housing development districts. Journal of the Korea Policy 5(1): 1-13.
  15. Park, J. T.(2006) Consideration of construction and maintenance stage about green about green building & development policy through Seoul Forest construction project. Architectural Institute of Korea 50(3): 42-44.
  16. Statistics Korea(2016) Korean Statistical Information Service (http://kosis.kr).
  17. TAAS(2016). Road Traffic Authority. http://taas.koroad.or.kr
  18. Yoo, S. Y.(2005) A study residents participation in process of residential land development conducted by the public sector. Korea Spatial Planning Review 2005.12: 125-144.