DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

역사도시경관으로서 세종대로 (구)국세청 별관 부지 설계

Design of the Former National Tax Service Building Site on Sejong-daero as a Historic Urban Landscape

  • 투고 : 2015.12.31
  • 심사 : 2016.02.23
  • 발행 : 2016.02.29

초록

서울시는 광복 70주년을 맞아 일제 강점기에 지어져 최근까지 사용했던 세종대로 (구)국세청 별관을 철거하고 시민의 공간으로 재조성하고자 설계공모를 시행했다. 본 연구는 설계공모에 출품된 설계안 중 하나로 대상지의 역사 맥락을 통해 장소 특성을 분석하고 개념을 도출하여 설계 전략과 내용을 서술했다. 지침서상 광역 분석과 세종대로의 가치와 문화 유산과의 연계방안을 고려하여 과거와 현재, 미래로 이어지는 공간이 되도록 명시하고 있다. 세종대로는 조선 건국에서 대한제국기, 일제 강점기와 현대에 이르기까지 도로구조의 변화와 함께 중요한 사건과 활동이 일어나는 중심공간이다. 대상지 배후지역인 정동은 근대 태동기 문물이 도입되는 첨단의 장소였으며 인접한 덕수궁, 성공회성당, 서울시 의회건물도 많은 변화를 거치며 현재에 이르렀다. 본 연구는 역사도시경관 관점으로 광역 분석을 통해 길과 광장의 의미를 고찰했다. 정동과 대상지 주변의 변화와 현황을 분석하고 설계의 주요 개념을 공공성의 회복으로 설정했다. '리-퍼브릭'은 고종이 선포한 대한제국의 이념을 상징하는 중의적 개념이다. 대상지의 공공성을 확보할 수 있는 열림, 연결, 비움으로 설계 키워드로 주요 전략을 수립하여 대안 검토를 통해 8% 경사 광장을 계획했다. 대상지 현황을 반영하여 장애자, 노약자 등 누구나 편하게 접근 가능한 램프 구조로 계획하며 인접 대지와의 자연스러운 연결을 도모했다. 성공회 성당 레벨의 테라스 광장과 보도에서 이어진 주 광장은 계단실 등과 같은 건축물의 신축 없이 완전히 비움으로써 열린 조망을 확보하고 다양한 현대 도시 활동을 담을 수 있도록 계획했다. 설계안은 고종이 지향하던 근대적 민주개념을 현대적으로 재해석한 것으로 장소의 가치를 다시 공공에게 환원하는데 기여하도록 했다. 본 연구는 역사적 배경과 중층의 시간이 쌓인 대상지 설계에 대한 방향성을 제고한다는 점에서 의의를 가진다.

The Seoul metropolitan government announced an open design competition for reconfiguring the annex building of the National Tax Service Building site on Sejong-daero as a space for citizens to commemorate the 70th anniversary of Korea's liberation. The site, built during the Japanese colonial period, has been in use ever since. This study, as one of the entries for the competition, described the strategy and design contents by drawing the concept and main points of the design through an analysis of the historical context of the site. As the guidelines instructed to consider the value of the Sejong-daero area and the cultural heritage through a comprehensive analysis, this study specified the site as a place connecting the past, present and future. Since the foundation of the Joseon dynasty, the Korean Empire and the Japanese colonial period, Sejong-daero has been a main site for important events and activities along with the change of the city structure. Jungdong, to the rear of the site, was a place for adopting new culture during the beginnings of modern Korea, while adjacent places like Duksugung, the Anglican church, and the Seoul City Council building have also been historic urban landscapes of the historical layers of time as the city has changed. When Gojong announced the Korean Empire, the city structure was remodeled with this site as the center along with Sogong-ro, Wongudan and so forth. In this study, public interest stated in the guidelines was focused and the relevance of the road and the plaza was considered from the view of an historic urban landscape by a comprehensive analysis with Sejong-daero as the center. The restoration of public interest was to be drawn as the concept of the object site by considering the current status and the change around the site and Jungdong at the rear. Returning the site to the public is ambiguous with the relevance of the restoration of public interest and as the symbol of the idea of the Korean Empire by Gojong's announcement. The object site, having the characteristic of being returned to the public, must ensure public interest and therefore the design strategy has been established with the keywords of openness, connection and void. As a result of a review of the alternatives, a plan for a square has an 8% slope, just as the original site does, and provides ramps for convenient access for all, including the disabled and the elderly, and is connected to the grounds adjacent. No construction is allowed at the terrace square of the Anglican church level and the main square connected to the pedestrian street, so a variety of modern city utilization can be done. The value of the site at which this design is aimed shall be given back to the public with the concepts of modern democracy, independence, and the vision of Gojong by reinterpreting the space from a modern viewpoint. This study focused on the processes of establishing a main concept and strategy rather than the content of the design details, and the suggestion is meaningful in that the design for the object site with historic backgrounds and the layers of time can continue to be grown.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, C.(2009) Duksugung. Doneok.
  2. Bandarin, F. and R. Oers(2014) The Historic Urban Landscape: Managing Heritage in Urban Century. Chichester: Willy Blackwell.
  3. Chae, H.(2012) Proposals for Urban Conservation based on Historic Urban Landscape Concepts -A Case Study of Seo-chon in Seoul. Master's Thesis. Seoul National University. Seoul, Korea.
  4. Choi, W.(2013) A Study on the Use and Function of Public Square as Behavior Setting. Master's Thesis. University of Seoul. Korea.
  5. Hanseongdo(1861).
  6. Jang, E.(2012) Proposing a Comprehensive Conservation and Management System for the Surrounding Areas of the World Heritage Sites: A Case Study of the Jongmyo Shrine and the Changdeokgung Palace Complex in Seoul, Korea. Master's Thesis. Seoul National University. Seoul, Korea.
  7. Kyeongseongdo(1910).
  8. Kyeongseongsigado(1927).
  9. Lee, T.(2005) Review of Gojong Period. Taehaksa.
  10. Lim, H. (2010) Seoul Identity of Road. Seoul Development Institute.
  11. Lim, S.(2011) Seoul Architecture of Japanese Colonial Period. Ewha Womans University Press.
  12. Naver map(2015).
  13. Park, H.(2010) A study on the symbolic spatial representation of the Daehan Empire, Wongudan. Journal of Seoul Studies (40): 107-158.
  14. Park, J.(2012) A Study on Delineating Buffer Zone of Jongmyo and Changdeokgung World Heritage Sites. Master's Thesis. Seoul National University. Seoul, Korea.
  15. Park, S. and J. Choi(2005) The study on the extension․transition process and use of event space in the city -Focusing on the street space of Jong-no. Journal of Urban Design Institute of Korea 6(2): 41-54.
  16. Seoul Historiography Institute(2009) Road of Seoul.
  17. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2010) A Study of Identity on Seoul City.
  18. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2015a) The Guideline of Design Competition.
  19. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2015b) Broadcast Data.
  20. Seoul Museum of History(2012) Jeongdong in 1900.
  21. Seo, Y.(2015) Analyzing the design competition entries for the Hoehyeon section of Namsan from a perspective of the historic urban landscape. Putting the past into the future. The Historic Environment 4(1): 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000022
  22. UNESCO(2005) Vienna Memorandum on "World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture-Managing the Historic Urban Landscape."
  23. UNESCO(2011) Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape.
  24. UNESCO(2013) New Life for Historic Cities.
  25. Veldpaus, L., A. P. Roders and B. J. F. Colenbrander(2013) Urban heritage: Putting the past into the future. The Historic Environment 4(1): 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000022
  26. 朝鮮と建築(1936) 15(3).
  27. www.cha.go.kr