한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제44권1호
  • /
  • Pages.29-39
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중요도-성취도분석을 통한 산지경관영향검토제도 연구

A Study on the Mountainous Landscape Impact Review-System by the Importance-Performance Analysis

  • 민수희 (한국산지보전협회 산지조사본부) ;
  • 정윤희 ((재)환경조경나눔연구원) ;
  • 주우영 (국립생태원 생태연구본부) ;
  • 장효진 (서울대학교 국토문제연구소)
  • Min, Su Hui (Forestland Survey Division, Korea Forest Conservation Association) ;
  • Jeung, Yoon Hee (Landscape Welfare Institute) ;
  • Joo, Woo Yeong (Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Jang, Hyo Jin (The Institute for Korean Regional Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.12.22
  • 심사 : 2016.02.15
  • 발행 : 2016.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 산지경관의 자연친화적 보전과 합리적인 이용을 위해 운영되는 산지경관영향검토제도를 활성화하고자 제도의 현황분석 및 문제점을 도출하고, 업무관계자를 대상으로 제도개선 설문조사를 실시해 제도의 개선방향을 마련하고자 하였다. 산지경관영향검토서 작성실태를 분석하기 위하여 관련 유사제도의 운영지침을 비교하고, 실제 산지전용을 위해 제출된 경관영향검토서를 분석하였다. 또한 관계자를 대상으로 중요도-성취도(IPA) 분석을 실시하여 산지경관영향 검토서의 효율적 작성과 산지경관영향검토제도 활성화를 위한 우선 개선항목 도출과 관계자 의견을 수렴하고자 하였다. IPA 분석결과, 산지경관영향검토서의 효율적 작성을 위해서는 우선적으로 '지역적 맥락을 고려한 산지경관 자원조사', '객관적인 조망점 선정'과 '경관영향 훼손 검토기준의 구체화' 항목이 개선되어야 한다. 또한 산지경관영향검토제도의 활성화를 위해서는 단기적으로는 '경관영향검토서 작성 검토에 대한 구체적 가이드라인 제공'이 우선 개선되어야 하며, 장기적으로는 '유사 경관심의 및 경관영향검토제도와의 차별화 및 연계'를 통해 산지경관의 고유성과 경관적 특성을 고려한 경관영향검토 기능의 강화와 제도 운영의 실효성을 제고해야 한다.

The purpose of this study was to suggest the improvement of the Mountainous Landscape Impact Review(MLIR) system for the conservation and eco-friendly use of mountain scenery. In order to understand the status of the MLIR system, a comparative analysis was conducted of the MLIR official guidelines and the 100 MLIR reports submitted to the Korea Forest Service from 2011 to 2013. In addition, an Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA) was conducted to take into account stakeholder opinions and to determine the first priorities to be improved upon in operation and functions of the MLIR system. The results of the IPA in evaluating the MLIR system showed that the components in the MLIR system that should be primarily improved are mountainous landscape resource inventory, objective and quantitative selection of viewpoints, and a checklist for examining the damage expected in mountainous lands. To Revitalize the Mountainous Landscape Impact Review system, the professional knowledge and experience of the stakeholders should be enhanced by education and training in the MLIR system over the short-term, while the effective functioning of the MLIR system should be reinforced by differentiation and connectivity of the MLIR system with similar institutions, and by emphasizing the uniqueness and properties of mountainous landscapes over the long-term.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, G. S., J, W. Ko and D. G. Sung(1999) A study on the making normalization function of landscape component for mountainous-district development landscape estimation and prediction. Journal of Engineering Research 30: 15-26.
  2. Choi, H. S.(2005) A study on improvements of landscape impact assessment - EIA and PER in priority -. Journal of Korean Environment Restoration Technology 8(4): 68-80.
  3. Chung, S. J., H. J. Hwang, D. Y. Jung and K. R. Choi(2005) Improvement schemes of the landscape design review system - Focused on the projects reviewed by the Incheon Landscape Committee-. Journal of The Urban Design Institute of Korea 12(4): 137-154
  4. Han, S. G.(2011) Busan building height regulations for the management of mountain landscape : Focused on the skyline of Hwangreung mountain. Journal of Academia-Industrial Technology 12(2): 970-978.
  5. Huh, J., D. S. Kim, S. H. Joo, C. S. Kim and M. J. Lee(2007) The visual preference for damaged mountainous landscape. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(3): 75-84.
  6. Lim, S. A.(2004) The Representative Scene of the Gangneung City in Travel Vrochure. MS Dissertation. Kangnung National University, Korea.
  7. Kang, Y. J., Y. C. Cha and M. S. Cha(2008) Geographical structure of view point in the landscape experience on mountain in Yangsan. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(3): 75-84.
  8. Kim, C. S., J. Y. Lee and Y. M. Kim(2011) A study on the methods of multiple sight surface and cumulative visibility analysis for the forest scape management around the Myeong-hwal fortress. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 29(4): 78-86.
  9. Kim, S. W.(2012) User's evaluation on the ecological trail in Gunsan reservoir area through importance-performance analysis. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science 39(3): 319-325. https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2012.39.3.319
  10. Korea Environment Institute(2013) Trend Analysis and Institutional Improvement Measures for the Natural Landscape Ration System.
  11. Korea Forest Service(2007) Improvement Mountainous Land Converxion System for Mountainous Landscape Maintenance.
  12. Korea Forest Service(2013) Establishment of Forest-Land Scenery Management System.
  13. Lee, S. M., H. S. Choi, C. S. Park, S. H. Joo and J. H. Shin(2007) A legal approach for preservation and management of natural landscape. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 13(3): 23-32.
  14. Ministry of Land(2012) Landscape Design Review System Operation and Research Ways to Internal Stability Plan. Urban Design Institute of Korea.
  15. Ministry of Environment(2007) Development Natural Landscape Assessment Technique and Natural Landscape Rating System Manual.
  16. Sohn, H. G., H. N. Jeong, S. Choi, D. G. Lee and C. W. Seo(2010) Policy directions for rational classification and management of forestland by considering the mountain ridge and valley networks. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  17. Prato, T. and D. Fagre(2007) Achieving ecosystem sustainability. In T. Prato and D. Fagre (Eds.), Sustaining Rocky Mountain Landscapes: Science, Policy and Management of the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem. RFF Press. pp. 302-311.
  18. Taylor, L. and A. Ryall(2004) Interdisciplinary Research and Management in Mountain Areas. The Banff Centre.