Journal of Science and Technology Studies (과학기술학연구)

Korean Association of Science and Technology Studies (한국과학기술학회)
권호 표지

Transition as a Theory and Practice: Transition Studies and Policies in Netherlands

이론과 실천으로서의 전환 : 네덜란드의 전환이론과 전환정책

  • Received : 2014.12.17
  • Accepted : 2015.04.20
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For continuous and successful innovation, changes in innovation system are required and have been magnified as a new controversy. With high public interest in changes of innovation system, Transition theory and policy in Netherlands are now attracting attentions of many researchers and policymakers. Transition policy in Netherlands is distinguished from existing policies for fundamental system change in that take remarkably different views and methods. Typical examples of transition in Netherlands are such as sustainable energy transition, biodiversity and natural resource transition, sustainable agriculture transition, and sustainable transportation. Transitions in Netherlands are still in the early stage of it but several positive effects are witnessing. However some problems - linking theory and practice, ambiguity of transition concept, linking long-term vision and short-term, resistance of existing regime, implementation problem, diffusion of support, etc.- to be tackled are still remaining. In spite of those problems, many lessons can be drawn from them. To guide structural changes in innovation system into the right path and cope with lock-in problem by existing system and regime, we need to learn from Transition theory and policy in Netherlands.

최근 혁신의 지속과 성공을 위해 기술혁신시스템을 어떻게 바꿀지가 중요한 논제로 등장했다. 실천적, 이론적 차원에서 혁신시스템의 변화에 관심이 높아지고 있는 시점에서 네덜란드의 전환은 큰 주목을 받고 있다. 네덜란드의 전환정책은 시스템의 근본적 변화를 추구하면서도 기존의 변화와는 상당히 다른 접근과 방식을 취하고 있기 때문이다. 대표적 전환으로는 지속가능한 에너지 전환, 생물다양성과 자연자원의 지속가능한 활용으로의 전환, 지속가능한 농업으로의 전환, 지속가능한 교통 등이 있다. 장기적 변화라는 점에서 네덜란드의 전환은 여전히 초기단계지만 전환에 대한 공감 확산, 적대적 행위자 간 연합 형성, 다양한 전환 네트워크의 형성이라는 긍정적 효과가 나타나고 있다. 하지만 여전히 해결이 필요한 문제도 있다. 이론과 실제의 연계, 전환 개념의 추상성과 모호성 극복, 장기적 비전과 단기적 행위의 연결, 폭넓은 민주적 참여 확보, 현존 레짐의 저항 극복, 집행 문제, 정부 내에서 전환에 대한 지지 확산의 문제 등이다. 이런 문제에도 불구하고 네덜란드의 전환은 시스템의 근본적 변화가 필요한 시점에서 많은 교훈을 주고 있다. 따라서 기존 시스템과 레짐에 의한 고착화를 해결하고 구조적 변화를 이끌어 내기 위해 네덜란드의 전환이론과 정책에서 배울 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 길종백.정병걸. (2009). 녹색성장과 환경.경제의 통합: 변형과 전환 사이에서. 정부학연구, 15(2): 45-70.
  2. 김병윤. (2008). 네덜란드의 '에너지 전환'. STEPI Working Paper Series, 2008-08.
  3. 성지은 (2006). 탈추격단계에서의 정책과 행정체제 변화. 과학기술학연구, 6(2): 45-74.
  4. 성지은.정병걸.송위진. (2012). 지속가능한 사회기술시스템으로의 전환과 백캐스팅. 과학기술학연구, 12(2): 81-116.
  5. 성지은.조예진 (2013). 시스템 전환과 지역 기반 전환 실험. 과학기술정책, 23(4): 27-45.
  6. 송위진.조예진.성지은.김종선. (2013). 사회.기술시스템 전환과 지속가능한 도시설계. IBue & Policy, 74.
  7. 송위진.황혜란 (2005). 혁신체제 전환의 유형과 과정. 과학기술정책연구원
  8. 송위진 외 (2006). 탈추격형 기술혁신체제의 모색. 과학기술정책연구원
  9. 송위진 (2013). 지속가능한 사회.기술시스템으로의 전환. 과학기술정책, 23(4): 4-16.
  10. 정재용.황혜란 (공편) (2013). 추격형 혁신시스템을 진단한다. 한울.
  11. Avelino, Flor, BreBers, Nanny & Kemp, Ren (2012). Transition Management as New Policy Making for Sustainable Mobility. In Geerlings, Harry, Shiftan, Yoram, & Stead, Dominic (eds.)(2012). Transition towards Sustainable Mobility: The Role of Instruments, Individuals and Institutions, 33-52. Surrey, UK: MPG Book Group.
  12. DRIFT (2011). Urban Transition Management Manual: 'Navigator' of the MUSIC Project. Dutch Research Institute for Transitions.
  13. Elzen, Boelie, Geels, Frank & Green, Kenneth (2004). System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, Cheltenham:: Edward Elgar.
  14. EZ (2000). Energie en samenleving in 2050, Nederland in wereldbeelden. Den Haag, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  15. EZ (2003). Sturen naar het zuiden. Een vernieuwd overheidsoptreden om de energietransitie op weg te helpen. Den Haag, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  16. EZ (2004). Innovation in Energy Policy. The Hague, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  17. Fischer, Arnout R. H., et al. (2012). Transforum System Innovation towards Sustainable Food. A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32: 595-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0067-4
  18. Geels, Frank W. (2002). Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration ProceBes: A Multi-level Perspective and a Case-study. Research Policy, 31(8/9): 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  19. Geels, Frank W. (2005). Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-technical Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  20. Geels, Frank W. (2007). Transformations of Large Technical Systems: A Multi-level Analysis of the Dutch Highway System(1950-2000). Science Technology & Human Values, 32(2): 123-149.Thpology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36: 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906293883
  21. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan. (2007). Typology of Socio-technical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36: 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
  22. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan (2008). Path Creation and Societal Embedding in Socio-technocal Transitions: How Automobiles Entered Dutch Society(1898-1970). Paper for Workshop, Technological Discontinuities and Transitions, Eindhoven, 14-16 May 2008.
  23. Gorris, Teije & van de Bosch, Suzanne (2012). Applying Management in Ongoing Programmes and Projects in the Netherlands: The Case of Transumo and Rush Hour Avoidance. In Geerlings, Harry, Shiftan, Yoram, & Stead, Dominic (eds.)(2012). Transition towards Sustainable Mobility: The Role of Instruments, Individuals and Institutions. 71-93. Surrey, UK: MPG Book Group.
  24. Hendrik, Carolyn M. (2008). On Inclusion and Network Governance: The Democratic Disconnect of Dutch Energy Transitions. Public Administration, 86(4): 1009-1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00738.x
  25. Ieromonachou, Petros, Potter Stephen & Enoch, Marcus (2004). Adapting Strategic Niche Management for evaluating radical transport policies--the case of the Durham Road AcceB Charging Scheme. International Journal of Transport Management, 2(2): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtm.2004.09.002
  26. Kemp, Ren (2013). Transition Management: A Model for Sustaina ble Development. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/157824972/Transition-Management-For-SD3.
  27. Kemp, Ren, Avelino, Flor & BreBers, Nanny (2011). Transition Management as a Model for Sustainable Mobility. European Transport, 47: 25-46.
  28. Kemp, Ren & Loorbach, Derk (2005). Dutch Policies to Manage the Transition to Sustainable Energy. http://kemp.unumerit.nl/pdf/Kemp-Loorbach%20chapter%20for%20Yearbook%20OO.pdf.
  29. Kemp, Ren & Loorbach, Derk (2006). Transition Management: A Reflexive Governance Approach. in VoB, J-P, Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R.(eds.), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, 103-130. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  30. Kemp, Ren , Loorbach, Derk & Rotmans, Jan (2007). Transition Management as a Model for Managing Processes of Co-Evolution. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14: 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469709
  31. Kemp, Ren & Martens, Pim (2007). Sustainable Development: How to Manage Something that is Subjective and Never Can Be Achieved?. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 3(2): 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2007.11907997
  32. Kemp, Ren & Rotmans, Jan (2004). Managing the Transition to Sustainable Mobility. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  33. Kern, Florian (2012). An International Perspective on the Energy Transition Project. In Verbong, Geert & Loorbach, Derk(eds.), Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity?, 277-295. New York, NY: Routledge
  34. Kern, Florian & Smith, Adrian (2008). Restructuring Energy Systems for Sustainability? Energy Transition Policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36(11): 4093-4103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018
  35. Laes, Erik, GoriBen, Leen & Nevens, Frank (2014). A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 2014. 6: 1129-1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031129
  36. Loorbach, Derk (2007), Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development. Utrecht: International Books.
  37. Loorbach, Derk (2008). Why and How Transition Management Emerges. Conference Paper, Long-term Policies: Governing Social-ecological Change, Berlin.
  38. Loorbach, Derk & Rotmans, Jan (2006) Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development' in X. in Olshoorn and A.J. Wieczorek (eds), Understanding Industrial Transformation. Views from Different Disciplines. Dordrecht: Springer
  39. Loorbach, Derk, van der Brugge, Rutger & Taanman, Mattijs (2008). Governance in the Energy Transition: Practice of Transition Management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 9(2): 294-315. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2008.019039
  40. Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S.G (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridger, MA: Belknap Press.
  41. Porter, Michael E. & Kraemer, Mark R. (2011). The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1): 62-77.
  42. Rotmans, Jan, Kemp, Ren & van ABelt, Marjolein (2000). Transitions & Transition Management, The Case of an Emission-free Energy Supply. International Centre for Integrative Studies, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  43. Rotmans, Jan, Kemp, Ren & van ABelt, Marjolein (2001). More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy. Foresight, 3(1): 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110803003
  44. Rotmans, Jan & Loorbach, Derk(2009). Complexity and Transition Management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2): 184-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00116.x
  45. Smith, Adrian (2012). Civil Society in Sustainable Energy Trnsitions. In Verbong, Geert & Loorbach, Derk (eds.) (2012), Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or NeceBity?, 180-202. New York, NY: Routledge.
  46. Smith, Adrian & Kern, Florian (2007). The Transitions Discourse in the Ecological Modernisation of the Netherlands. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, 160.
  47. Smith, Adrian & Kern, Florian (2009). The Transitions Storyline in Dutch Environmental Policy. Environmental Politics, 18(1): 78-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802624835
  48. Veldkamp, A., et al. (2008). Triggering Transitions Towards Sustainable Development of the Dutch Agricultural Sector: TransForum's Approach. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007050
  49. Verbong, Geert & Geels, Frank (2002). Future Electricity Systems: Visions, Scenarios and Transition Pathways. In Verbong, Geert & Loorbach, Derk (eds.) (2012), Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity?, 203-219 New York, NY: Routledge
  50. Verbong, Geert & Loorbach, Derk (eds.) (2012), Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or NeceBity?, New York, NY: Routledge
  51. van der Brugge, Rutger, Rotmans, Jan & Loorbach, Derk (2005). The Transition in Dutch Water Management. Regional Environmental Change, 5: 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0086-7
  52. van der Have, Robert (2008). System Transition Concepts and Framework for Analysing Nordic Energy System Research and Governance. VTT Working Papers, 99.
  53. van der Loo, Frans & Loorbach, Derk(2012), The Dutch Energy Transition Porject(2000-2009). in Verbong, Geert & Loorbach, Derk(eds.). Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity?, 220-250. New York, NY: Routledge.
  54. VoB, Jan-Peter, Smith, Adrian & Grin, John (2009). Designing Long-term Policy: Rethinking Transition Management. Policy Science, 42: 275-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5