The Study on the Influence of Career Selection Type of University Students Major in Foodservice, Class Participation, Career Preparation Behavior

외식전공 대학생의 진로선택유형, 수업참여도, 진로준비행동과의 영향 관계 연구

  • Park, Yi-Kyung (Dept. of Food Culinary Management Kyungju University) ;
  • Woo, Iee-Shik (Dept. of Food Culinary Management Kyungju University)
  • 박이경 (경주대학교 외식조리학부) ;
  • 우이식 (경주대학교 외식조리학부)
  • Received : 2015.06.05
  • Accepted : 2015.08.03
  • Published : 2015.08.31

Abstract

This study examined the factors that affect the relationship among career selection type, class participation, and career preparation behavior for university students who major in food service. A total of 350 questionnaires were distributed to students, of which 320 were deemed suitable for analysis after the removal of 30 unusable responses. In order to perform statistical analyses required in the study, SPSS 18.0 Statistical Program was employed for frequency analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, correlations, and regression analysis. The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that two factors regarding career selection type were extracted from all measurements with a KMO of 0.754 and a total cumulative variance of 64.555%, with regard to class participation, three factors [I found only 1 factor in the paper; there were 3 variables] were extracted with a total cumulative variance of 71.1% and a KMO score of 0.702. One factor for career preparation behavior was extracted that accounted for a total cumulative variance of 64.312% and a KMO score of 0.765. Based on the study's results, the main research hypothesis that identified the relationships that career selection type had with and between class participation and career preparation behavior was partially adopted.

본 연구에서는 외식전공대학생의 진로선택유형에 따라서 수업참여도와 진로준비행동에 미치는 영향요인들과 그 요인을 이용한 앞으로의 활용방안을 제시하고자 한다. 총 350부의 설문지를 배포하여 불성실하게 응답한 30부의 설문지를 제외한 나머지 320부의 유효한 설문지를 실증연구에 사용되었다. 조사 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 통계프로그램 SPSS 18.0을 활용하여 빈도분석, 요인분석 및 신뢰도분석, 상관관계분석, 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과를 보면 진로선택유형에 대한 측정항목의 탐색적 요인분석 결과, 2개 요인으로 KMO 값은 0.754, 총분산비율 64,555%, 수업참여도에 대한 요인분석은 전체설명력 95,640%, KMO 값은 0,702으로 나타났다. 진로준비행동에 대한 요인분석은 전체설명력 64,312%, KMO 값은 0,765로 나타났다. 따라서 진로선택유형에 따른 수업참여도가 진로준비행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 가설은 부분채택 되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim GH (1995). 적용영역별 접근 상담심리학. 학지사, 서울.
  2. Bright JEH, Pryor RG, Harpham L (2005). The role of chance events in career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior 66:561- 576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.001
  3. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74(1):59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  4. Fim JD, Cox D (1992). Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal of Education 24(1):1-16.
  5. Go BS, Kim DK (2013). Cooking, the relationship between motivation and learning attitudes of selected major specialty bakery university: University freshman D targets, located in Daegu Metropolitan City. Korea Food Service Industry Association 9(1):57-69.
  6. Gottfredson LS (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology 28(6):545-579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545
  7. Han YJ (2014). Students Select Majors Motivation and Satisfaction of the Major Class Participation and Professional Values, Career Preparation and Effect Relationship between Action Research: Cooking, Eating Out Targets related to Major College Students. Graduate School Doctoral Thesis, Rigid University.
  8. Jeung BY (2010). Students Choose a Major Impact on the Motivation of Career Choice Factors. Master's Thesis Game, Kyong Gi University.
  9. Jeung EI (2012). Explore factors that affect the participation of university students in the class. Educational Research Methods 24(2):355-378.
  10. Jo SJ (2010). Communities consumer oriented research on determinants of students' academic selection. Adult Education Association Korea 13(3):111-151.
  11. Kim NH (2011). A Student Via a Basic Psychological Needs and Lessons Chayeo-tube Attachment Relationships of Teachers and Academic Achievement System. Doctoral Dissertation, Hongik University.
  12. Kim BY, Park SH (2007). Web-based asynchronous bulletin factors influencing the active participation of learners in the use of learning navigation. Training of Information and Media Studies 12(4):235-261.
  13. Kanfer R, Wanberg CR, Kantrowitz TM (2001). Job search and employment: A personalitymotivational analysis and meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:837-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.837
  14. Park HS (2011). Some local health research for medical students of the career series configuration values factor. Health Care Industry 5 (4):95-111.
  15. Park SJ (2011). Police Major Impact on Students' Career Choices and Career Satisfaction are Major Adaptation. Graduate SchooL Doctoral Thesis, Dongguk University.
  16. Seo SJ (2008). Learning problems review on ways of promoting class participation and attention for children. Pedagogical Research 12(3):789- 813.
  17. Seok DRS, Choi SH (2009). Employment activation plan through the consciousness of college students and career preparation behavior analysis study. Dong-A University Research Management Issues 30:241-269.
  18. Sin J (2012). Students Choose a Major Impact on the Motivation of Job Readiness. Master's Thesis, Raised Ceilings Ga Chon University.
  19. Son EN (2009). Career counseling: Study the role of chance or opportunity in the career choice process. Study Counseling 10(1):385-397.
  20. Statistics (2014). http://kosis.kr. Employment, labor and wages: the youth unemployment rate.
  21. Yeo YK, Kim DI, Jeung YJ, YI JY (2011). The development and employment preparation behavior Tue appropriate for college students. Korea Education Research 17(3):267-291.
  22. Yi JK (2004). Students Prepare for Employment Action in Korea. Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University.