The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제7권5호
  • /
  • Pages.343-348
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength

  • Yoo, Ji-Young (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Yoon, Hyung-In (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital) ;
  • Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.16
  • 심사 : 2015.08.26
  • 발행 : 2015.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of composite resin on the fracture surface of metal-ceramic depending on the repair systems and surface roughening methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 30 disk specimens were fabricated, 15 of each were made from feldspathic porcelain and nickel-chromium base metal alloy. Each substrate was divided into three groups according to the repair method: a) application of repair system I (Intraoral Repair Kit) with diamond bur roughening (Group DP and DM), b) application of repair system I with airborne-particle abrasion (Group SP and SM), and c) application of repair system II (CoJet Intraoral Repair System, Group CP and CM). All specimens were thermocycled, and the shear bond strength was measured. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis and the Mann-Whitney test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. For the porcelain specimens, group SP showed the highest shear bond strength ($25.85{\pm}3.51MPa$) and group DP and CP were not significantly different. In metal specimens, group CM showed superior values of bond strength ($13.81{\pm}3.45MPa$) compared to groups DM or SM. CONCLUSION. Airborne-particle abrasion and application of repair system I can be recommended in the case of a fracture localized to the porcelain. If the fracture extends to metal surface, the repair system II is worthy of consideration.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. dos Santos JG, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:165-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.07.002
  2. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
  3. Gordon SR, Lloyd PM. Fixed prosthodontics in the elderly population. Life expectancy of fixed restorations, failures, and retreatment methods. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:783-95.
  4. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:416-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90379-3
  5. Leibrock A, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:130-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00346.x
  6. Ozcan M. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:265-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01038.x
  7. Coornaert J, Adriaens P, De Boever J. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:338-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90217-8
  8. Strub JR, Stiffler S, Scharer P. Causes of failure following oral rehabilitation: biological versus technical factors. Quintessence Int 1988;19:215-22.
  9. Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:127-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70115-X
  10. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:299-302.
  11. Barzilay I, Myers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90001-7
  12. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT Jr. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:526-31. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119843
  13. Haneda IG, Fonseca RG, de Almeida JG, Cruz CA, Adabo GL. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. Gen Dent 2009;57:644-51.
  14. Robin C, Scherrer SS, Wiskott HW, de Rijk WG, Belser UC. Weibull parameters of composite resin bond strengths to porcelain and noble alloy using the Rocatec system. Dent Mater 2002;18:389-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00062-8
  15. Panah FG, Rezai SM, Ahmadian L. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2. J Prosthodont 2008;17: 409-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00296.x
  16. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3
  17. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660091001
  18. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-7.
  19. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 1992;8:158-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90074-M
  20. Suliman AH, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:118-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8
  21. Tulunoglu IF, Beydemir B. Resin shear bond strength to porcelain and a base metal alloy using two polymerization schemes. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:181-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80010-4
  22. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:479-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9
  23. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:699-705. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00299.x
  24. Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Ide T, Matsumura H. Evaluation of two dual-functional primers and a tribochemical surface modification system applied to the bonding of an indirect composite resin to metals. Odontology 2009;97:103-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-009-0103-x
  25. Yoshida K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of adhesive metal primers on bonding a prosthetic composite resin to metals. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:357-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90180-V
  26. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25:1477-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.020
  27. Kalra A, Mohan MS, Gowda EM. Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6: 196-200. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.156045
  28. Zalkind M, Slavik J, Raviv E, Stern N. Bond strength of photocured composite resin facings: clinical versus laboratory procedures. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:694-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00286.x
  29. Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces - an insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:622-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01569.x
  30. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
  31. Diaz-Arnold AM, Aquilino SA. An evaluation of the bond strengths of four organosilane materials in response to thermal stress. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:257-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90327-2
  32. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740011501

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics vol.9, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257
  2. Effect of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser on the Bond Strength of a Repair Composite to Feldspathic Porcelain pp.1059941X, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12762
  3. Influence of different universal adhesives on the repair performance of hybrid CAD-CAM materials vol.44, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e23
  4. The effects of universal adhesive and innovative fabrication techniques of metal-ceramic restorations on repair strength of porcelain fracture with metal exposure vol.33, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1577595
  5. Effect of self-etching ceramic primer on the bond strength of feldspathic porcelain repair vol.33, pp.14, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1609645
  6. Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of resin composites with titanium vol.33, pp.21, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1643440
  7. Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Indirect Composite Resin to Three Different Computer-Milled Cores After Thermocycling vol.32, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.30699/jidai.32.3.4.67
  8. Evaluation of Efficacy of Various Surface Conditioning Methods on the Repair Bond Strength of Composite to Different Fracture Types of Zirconia Ceramics vol.2021, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5537761
  9. Shear Bond Strength of Veneered Zirconia Repaired Using Various Methods and Adhesive Systems: A Comparative Study vol.13, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060910