DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of core characters and veneering technique on biaxial flexural strength in porcelain fused to metal and porcelain veneered zirconia

  • Oh, Ju-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn, Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Ju-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Min-Ho (Department Dental Biomaterials, Institute of Oral Bio-science, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Jae-Min (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2014.09.17
  • 심사 : 2015.01.09
  • 발행 : 2015.10.30

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the core materials, thickness and fabrication methods of veneering porcelain on prosthesis fracture in the porcelain fused to metal and the porcelain veneered zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty nickel-chrome alloy cores and 40 zirconia cores were made. Half of each core group was 0.5 mm-in thickness and the other half was 1.0 mm-in thickness. Thus, there were four groups with 20 cores/group. Each group was divided into two subgroups with two different veneering methods (conventional powder/liquid layering technique and the heat-pressing technique). Tensile strength was measured using the biaxial flexural strength test based on the ISO standard 6872:2008 and Weibull analysis was conducted. Factors influencing fracture strength were analyzed through three-way ANOVA (${\alpha}{\leq}.05$) and the influence of core thickness and veneering method in each core materials was assessed using two-way ANOVA (${\alpha}{\leq}.05$). RESULTS. The biaxial flexural strength test showed that the fabrication method of veneering porcelain has the largest impact on the fracture strength followed by the core thickness and the core material. In the metal groups, both the core thickness and the fabrication method of the veneering porcelain significantly influenced on the fracture strength, while only the fabrication method affected the fracture strength in the zirconia groups. CONCLUSION. The fabrication method is more influential to the strength of a prosthesis compared to the core character determined by material and thickness of the core.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1965;119:251-67.
  2. Magne P, Belser U. The esthetic width in fixed porcelain restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1999;8:106-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00019.x
  3. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:449-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002
  4. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007
  5. Triwatana P, Nagaviroj N, Tulapornchai C. Clinical performance and failures of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a review literature. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:76-83. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.76
  6. Napankangas R, Raustia A. Twenty-year follow-up of metalceramic single crowns: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:307-11.
  7. Reitemeier B, Hansel K, Kastner C, Walter MH. Metal-ceramic failure in noble metal crowns: 7-year results of a prospective clinical trial in private practices. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19: 397-9.
  8. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CHF. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-8.
  9. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, , Gauckler LJ, Scharer P, Hammerle CHF. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006;37:685-93.
  10. Agustin-Panadero R, Roman-Rodriguez JL, Ferreiroa A, Sola-Ruiz MF, Fons-Font A. Zirconia in fixed prosthesis: A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 2014;6:e66-73.
  11. Quinn JB, Sundar V, Parry EE, Quinn GD. Comparison of edge chipping resistance of PFM and veneered zirconia specimens. Dent Mater 2010;26:13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.005
  12. Alhasanyah A, Vaidyanathan TK, Flinton RJ. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns. J Prosthodont 2013;22: 383-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12016
  13. Millen CS, Reuben RL, Ibbetson RJ. The effect of coping/veneer thickness on the fracture toughness and residual stress of implant supported, cement retained zirconia and metal-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 2012;28:e250-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.008
  14. Henriques B, Soares D, Silva FS. Shear bond strength of a hot pressed Au-Pd-Pt alloy-porcelain dental composite. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:1718-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.029
  15. Rice RW. Limitations of pore-stress concentrations on the mechanical properties of porous materials. J Mater Sci 1997; 32:4731-6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018674713006
  16. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW. Science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Saunders; 2003, p. 665-719.
  17. Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Kawamura Y, Kinuta S, Mutobe Y, Yatani H. Analysis of internal defects in all-ceramic crowns using micro-focus X-ray computed tomography. Dent Mater J 2007;26:598-601. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.598
  18. Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res 1990;69:1791-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690120201
  19. Ban S, Hasegawa J, Anusavice KJ. Effect of loading conditions on bi-axial flexure strength of dental cements. Dent Mater 1992;8:100-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90063-I
  20. Lin WS, Ercoli C, Feng C, Morton D. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics. J Prosthodont 2012;21:353-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00845.x
  21. Aboushelib MN1, de Kler M, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. Effect of veneering method on the fracture and bond strength of bilayered zirconia restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:237-40.
  22. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006;22:857-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014
  23. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008;17:9-13.
  24. Christensen GJ. PFM vs. zirconia restorations-how are they comparing clinically? Clinician's Report. CR found 2008;11:1-2.
  25. Gonzaga CC, Cesar PF, Miranda WG Jr, Yoshimura HN. Slow crack growth and reliability of dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2011;27:394-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.025

피인용 문헌

  1. Influence of veneering technique and veneer-coping thickness on fracture toughness of implant retained veneered Y-TZP zirconia crowns vol.31, pp.16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1277863
  2. Influence of core thickness and artificial aging on the biaxial flexural strength of different all-ceramic materials: An in-vitro study vol.36, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-157
  3. Comparison of Adhesion of a Novel Pre-sintered Cobalt-Chromium to Pre-sintered Zirconia and Cast Nickel-Chromium vol.19, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2341
  4. Debonding/crack initiation and flexural strengths of bilayered zirconia core and veneering ceramic composites vol.39, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-321
  5. Fatigue behavior and colorimetric differences of a porcelain-veneered zirconia: effect of quantity and position of specimens during firing vol.65, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpor_2019_336
  6. The number of specimens in a furnace affects the biaxial flexural strength of veneered zirconia specimens after sintering vol.35, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816790