Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.343

Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength  

Yoo, Ji-Young (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Yoon, Hyung-In (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital)
Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.7, no.5, 2015 , pp. 343-348 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of composite resin on the fracture surface of metal-ceramic depending on the repair systems and surface roughening methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 30 disk specimens were fabricated, 15 of each were made from feldspathic porcelain and nickel-chromium base metal alloy. Each substrate was divided into three groups according to the repair method: a) application of repair system I (Intraoral Repair Kit) with diamond bur roughening (Group DP and DM), b) application of repair system I with airborne-particle abrasion (Group SP and SM), and c) application of repair system II (CoJet Intraoral Repair System, Group CP and CM). All specimens were thermocycled, and the shear bond strength was measured. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis and the Mann-Whitney test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. For the porcelain specimens, group SP showed the highest shear bond strength ($25.85{\pm}3.51MPa$) and group DP and CP were not significantly different. In metal specimens, group CM showed superior values of bond strength ($13.81{\pm}3.45MPa$) compared to groups DM or SM. CONCLUSION. Airborne-particle abrasion and application of repair system I can be recommended in the case of a fracture localized to the porcelain. If the fracture extends to metal surface, the repair system II is worthy of consideration.
Keywords
Porcelain repair; Composite resin; Shear bond strength; Tribochemical silica coating;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-7.
2 Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces - an insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:622-30.   DOI
3 Leibrock A, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:130-7.   DOI
4 Coornaert J, Adriaens P, De Boever J. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:338-42.   DOI
5 dos Santos JG, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:165-73.   DOI
6 Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-31.   DOI
7 Gordon SR, Lloyd PM. Fixed prosthodontics in the elderly population. Life expectancy of fixed restorations, failures, and retreatment methods. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:783-95.
8 Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:416-21.   DOI
9 Ozcan M. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:265-9.   DOI
10 Strub JR, Stiffler S, Scharer P. Causes of failure following oral rehabilitation: biological versus technical factors. Quintessence Int 1988;19:215-22.
11 Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:127-31.   DOI
12 Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:299-302.
13 Barzilay I, Myers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131-7.   DOI
14 Panah FG, Rezai SM, Ahmadian L. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2. J Prosthodont 2008;17: 409-14.   DOI
15 Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT Jr. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:526-31.   DOI
16 Haneda IG, Fonseca RG, de Almeida JG, Cruz CA, Adabo GL. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. Gen Dent 2009;57:644-51.
17 Robin C, Scherrer SS, Wiskott HW, de Rijk WG, Belser UC. Weibull parameters of composite resin bond strengths to porcelain and noble alloy using the Rocatec system. Dent Mater 2002;18:389-95.   DOI
18 Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-91.   DOI
19 Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-5.   DOI
20 Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 1992;8:158-61.   DOI
21 Suliman AH, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:118-20.   DOI
22 Tulunoglu IF, Beydemir B. Resin shear bond strength to porcelain and a base metal alloy using two polymerization schemes. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:181-6.   DOI
23 Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:479-88.   DOI
24 Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25:1477-83.   DOI
25 Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:699-705.   DOI
26 Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Ide T, Matsumura H. Evaluation of two dual-functional primers and a tribochemical surface modification system applied to the bonding of an indirect composite resin to metals. Odontology 2009;97:103-8.   DOI
27 Yoshida K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of adhesive metal primers on bonding a prosthetic composite resin to metals. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:357-62.   DOI
28 Kalra A, Mohan MS, Gowda EM. Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6: 196-200.   DOI
29 Zalkind M, Slavik J, Raviv E, Stern N. Bond strength of photocured composite resin facings: clinical versus laboratory procedures. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:694-8.   DOI
30 Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.   DOI
31 Diaz-Arnold AM, Aquilino SA. An evaluation of the bond strengths of four organosilane materials in response to thermal stress. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:257-60.   DOI
32 Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-7.   DOI