References
- Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- Department for Education. (2011). The Framework for the National Curriculum. A report by the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum review. London: Department for Education.
- Department for Education. (2013). The National Curriculum in England : Framework document for consultation. London: Department for Education.
- Department for National primary and secondary Education [敎育部國民及學前敎育署]. (2008a). Ordinary high school compulsory syllabuses [普通高級中學必修科目課程綱要]. Taipei: National Education Department for primary and secondary.
- Department for National primary and secondary Education [敎育部國民及學前敎育署]. (2008b). 9 years national basic curriculum for natural life and technology learning [國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要自然與生活科技學習領域]. Taipei: National Education Department for primary and secondary.
- Finnish National Board of Education. (2003). National Core Curriculum For Upper Secondary Schools 2003. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
- Finnish National Board of Education. (2004). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2004. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
- Fogarty, R. (1991). How to integrate the curricula. NY: Skylight.
- Hwang, G.-H. (1999). Meanings and criteria of curriculum continuity. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(1), 167-192.
- Hwang, Y., Kang, H.-S., & Yoo, J.-S. (2006). Research on the shared articulation of science and mathematics in early childhood and elementary school curricula. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 26(3), 33-57.
- International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement [IAEEA]. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS.
- Kang, H., Lee, W., Huh, Y., Lee, J., Yoo, J., Park, Y., Choe, H., & Park, C. (2008). Understanding by design (G. Wiggins & J. McTighe, Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original work published 2005).
- Kim, D. (2013). Present states and issues of curriculum continuity. In Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (Ed.), A strengthening plan for improvement of national curriculum continuity (Research report ORM 2013-35, pp.77-80). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Kim, D.-H., & Kim, H.-N. (2012). International comparison of contents about particle concept in national science curricula. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(2), 164-176.
- Kim, J.-S. (2006). An investigation on the concept of curriculum continuity. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(4), 83-108.
- Kim, J.-S., Park, S.-K., Choi, J., & Lee, H. (2013). International comparative studies on the sequence and integrity of elementary and secondary school curricula (Research report RRC 2013-3). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Kook, D.-S., & Kim, H.-M. (2004). An analysis on the conceptual connection of meteorology contents in science courses of elementary, middle and high school. Bulletin of Science Education, 20(1), 9-27.
- Kwon, C.-S., & Jang, M.-S. (2004). A comparative study on the connection between elementary and secondary science contents of DPRK and Republic of Korea. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25(7), 558-564.
- Lee, H. (1987). Basic principle of curriculum and instruction (R. W. Tyler, Trans.). Seoul: Kyoyookbook. (Original work published 1949).
- Lee, Y., Yoon, H., Song, J.-Y., & Bang, D. (2014). Analysis of science educational contents of Singapore, Canada and US focused on the integrated concepts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.1.1.00021
- Lee, Y.-R. (2004). Analysis of curriculum development processes and the relationship between general statements of the curriculum and science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(3), 468-480.
- Lee, Y.-R., Kwak, Y., & Kim, D.-Y. (2005). Analysis and evaluation of the earth science content relevance in the 7th national science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 26(8), 759-770.
- Leem, Y., & Kim, Y.-S. (2013). A historical study on the Korean science curriculum for the elementary and secondary schools. Biology Education, 41(3), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.3.483
- Maeng, S., Seong, Y., & Jang, S. (2013). Present states, methodological features, and an exemplar study of the research on learning progressions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.161
- Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. (2007). A guide for science curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2009). Elementary and secondary school curriculum : General statement (MEST Notification No. 2009-41). Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2012). Science curriculum (MEST Notification No. 2011-361). Seoul: Ministry of Education Science and Technology.
- Nam, S.-K., Lee, K.-H., & Song, K.-O. (2010). Diagnosis of present situation for educational articulation in school system (MEST Notification No. 2009-11). Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
- National Research Council [NRC] (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8: Science and Technology. Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2008a). The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 9 and 10: Science. Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2008b). The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 and 12: Science. Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do, Vol. 1. Paris: OECD.
- Paik, N.-J. (2014). Review of statements of achievement standards in subject curriculum : Focusing on the national science curriculum of Republic of Korea and the U. S.. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.32.2.201406.005
- Paik, S.-H., Kim, H.-N., & Cho, B.-K. (2000). Development of a tool for K-12 science curriculum articulation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(2), 262-273.
- Park, C.-H. (2005). The transition of curriculum development and implementation system in liberated Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(3), 35-55.
- Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S., Jeong, J.-S., Lee, E., Yu, E., Lee, D., Park, J., & Baek, Y. (2012). Developmental study of science education content standards. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 729-750. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.729
- Son, M. (2004). An appraisal of the sequential coherence between primary-secondary curriculum : A study on the organization and presentation of content knowledge in the primary science curriculum. Asian Journal of Education, 5(2), 159-181.
- Song, S.-H., Lee, Y.-H., Lee, J.-R., Kim, S.-W., Kang, S.-H., Park, J.-Y., Kang, S.-J., Kim, K.-H., & Yoo, K.-H. (1991). Development and application of an analysis taxonomy for curricular articulation in mathematics and science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 11(2), 119-131.
- Suh, Y. (2008). An analysis of sequence of earth science content in elementary school curriculum in Korea and the U. S.. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(4), 356-370.
- Woo, H., & Cha, H. (2013). A study on connectivity of the unit of evolution between secondary school biology textbooks reformed according to the 7th and 2009 revised Korea national science curriculum. Biology Education, 41(4), 618-637. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.4.618
- Yoo, Y.-E., & Kim, E.-J. (2013). Analysis of the continuity and sequence in the science education curriculums for kindergarten, elementary school, and middle school. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 33(4), 241-265. https://doi.org/10.18023/kjece.2013.33.4.011
- Yun, E., & Park, Y. (2014). Relationship of using science terminology between science curriculum and middle school science textbooks in the 2009 national curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(7), 667-675. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.7.0667
Cited by
- A Comparative Study of Elementary Science Curriculum between Korea and USA - Focusing on Earth and Space Domain of Third and Fourth Grades - vol.35, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.362
- The Rock Cycle Composition Elements and Process of the Pre-service Earth Science Teachers' Understanding vol.9, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2016.9.2.186
- International Comparison Study on the Science Curriculum about Articulation of the ‘Light’ and ‘Electricity’ Concept vol.20, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2016.20.4.322