Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Landscape Composition of Palace Gardens in Korea, China, Japan - Focused on Changdeokgung Palace, Summer Palace and Sento Imperial Palace -

한·중·일 궁궐정원의 경관 구성 비교 연구 - 창덕궁(昌德宮), 이화원( 頤和園), 선동어소(仙洞御所)를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2015.11.09
  • Accepted : 2015.12.18
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out investigation of characteristics palace gardens representing historical background, political and cultural identity in Korea, China, and Japan. It had been done a comparative analysis in formation, location and site layout, site composition, landscape elements and planning, landscape technique and vista for palace gardens in East asia's three countries. In order to process this study, Changdeokgung Palace in Korea, Summer Palace in China and Sento Imperial Palace in Japan were selected based on similar status. therefore it provide theoretical foundation to investigate the identity of palace gardens in three countries. Furthermore the study determined homogeneity(similarity) and heterogeneity(differentiation) of the characteristics between palace gardens in three countries through the in-depth comparative analysis in order to investigate identity of palace gardens in three countries and to present the value of Korean palace garden. Homogeneity and heterogeneity between palace gardens in three countries deducted from the study were summarized as follows; First, it shows indigenous style of Korean garden throughout adapting natural terrain without natural destruction. Second, various symbolic elements which ie reflected East asian ideologies present in the gardens. Chinese thoughts and technique were influenced in the development of palace garden in Korea and implemented in similar ways of China. Homogeneity of utilizing waterscape could be found in three countries. Lastly, Palace garden in Changdeokgung had played a role as cultural place with taste for the arts rather than representing authority of the throne. It appears to be similar in China and Japan. The reason how Korea, China and Japan established their own independent style is that each palace garden had been developed to embrace indigenous culture with introduced elements even though they were closely bound up with culture.

본 연구는 동아시아 삼국 한국, 중국 그리고 일본 고정원 문화의 정수이자 역사적 배경과 정치, 문화적 관계성 등을 공간적으로 잘 대변할 수 있는 궁궐정원을 대상으로 형성배경, 입지와 배치, 공간구성, 공간구성요소 그리고 조성계획 및 경관연출기법과 조망적 특징을 비교, 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 유사한 위상을 가진 한국의 창덕궁, 중국의 이화원 그리고 일본의 선동어소를 선정하여 3국의 궁궐정원에 대한 이해와 연구기반을 구축하고자 하였다. 또한 경관 연출을 중심으로 한중일 궁궐정원의 원형에 대한 비교와 분석을 통해 동질성(유사성) 및 이질성(차별성)을 찾아 한중일 궁궐정원이 가지는 정체성을 규명하고 나아가 한국 궁궐정원이 가지는 가치를 제시하고자 하였다. 동질성과 이질성을 기반으로 도출된 비교특성은 다음과 같다. 첫째 자연을 훼손하지 않은 정원의 조성으로 자연에 순응한 한국 고유의 양식을 보여준다. 둘째 동아시아적 사상을 반영한 다양한 상징적 정원요소가 표현되고 있다. 우리 궁궐정원의 발달에 있어 중국의 사상과 기술, 기법 등이 큰 영향을 끼쳤고 또한 유사한 방식으로 공간에 구현되었음을 알 수 있다. 수경관을 적극적으로 활용한 유사함은 한국과 중국뿐만 아니라 일본에서도 찾을 수 있다. 셋째 창덕궁 후원은 엄격한 왕권의 권위보다 풍류적 취향의 문화 예술적 수용체 역할을 하였다. 창덕궁과 이화원, 그리고 선동어소가 문화수용체의 성격을 지니듯이 한중일 3국이 문화적으로 긴밀하게 연결되어 있음에도 그 형태와 재현의 방법이 다르며 각각 독자적인 궁정정원의 양식을 수립할 수 있었던 것은 각 정원이 각 나라 고유의 문화와 예술을 수용하면서 발전해왔기 때문이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon, Y. G.(2001). 16 Issues in Space Design, Seoul: Kukje Publishing House, pp. 161-163.
  2. The Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture(2009). The History of Landscape Architecture in the East, Seoul: Daega, p. 4.
  3. Kwon, Y. G.(2006). Space Syntactics in Korea, China and Japan: in search of genetic prototype for space, Seoul: Kukje Publishing House, p. 26.
  4. Hunt, J. D.(2000). Greater Perfection: The Practice of Garden Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 10-11.
  5. Stephenson, J.(2008). The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84(2): 127-139, p. 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003
  6. Yoon, S. J., Kwon, J. W. and Hong, K. P.(2014). A Historical Study on the Propagation and Diffusion of the Traditional Japanese Garden in Foreign Countries - Focused on World's Fairs between 1867 and 1939 -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 32(2): 167-179, p. 168. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2014.32.2.167
  7. Kwon, Y. G.(2001). 16 Issues in Space Design, Seoul: Kukje Publishing House, p. 1.
  8. Chung, D. O.(1982). a Comparative Study on the Traditional Landscape Pond Gardens of Korea and Japan. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 1(1): 41-62.
  9. Sogugisil(小口基實)(1983). Concerning Gardens in Korea, China and Japan. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 2(1): 137-144.
  10. Lee, S.(1984). The comparative studies between the Korean old Garden and Japanese one (With Anapji and Toinji). Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 3(1): 263-285.
  11. Kwon, Y. G.(2001). A comparative study on the syntactic aspect in traditional architectural spaces : the cases of Korea, China and Japan, Korea University Ph.D Thesis
  12. Long, D. and Kim, J. M.(2006). A Study on the Site Selection and Spatial Composition of Royal Palaces -Focused on the Kyongbok Palace and the Forbidden City-. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 24(4): 38-50.
  13. Park, K. B.(2006). Studies on the Restitution of the Imaginary Environment through the Comparison of Korean, Chinese and Japanese Historical and Cultural Landscape - A Case Design : Sangsaengjiwon -, Korea University Ph.D Thesis
  14. Kim, H. J.(2008). Interpretation on the Prototype of Royal Palace Landscape Architectures in Korea, China and Japan - the Cases of Changdeok Palace, Forbidden City and Kyoto Imperial Palace -, Korea University Ph.D Thesis
  15. Choi, J. D.(2006). Changdeokgung: a genuine palace in Joseon dynasty, Seoul: Nulwa, pp. 19-20.
  16. Han, Y. W.(2006). Entering House of Josean, East Palace, Paju: Hyohyung Book, pp. 13-14.
  17. Ju, N. C.(1996). Secret Garden, Seoul: Daewonsa, p. 22.
  18. Cho, J. M.(2012). Palace, talking about Joseon dynasty, Paju: Artbooks, p. 202
  19. Choi, J. D.(2006). Changdeokgung: a genuine palace in Joseon dynasty, Seoul: Nulwa, pp. 157-158.
  20. Son, Y. H. and Ham, K. M.(2011). A Study on Yijing and the Landscape Characteristics through the Analysis of Poems in Changdeokgung's Rear Garden. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 29(3): 130-131.
  21. Zhang, J. M.(2009). The Interpretation of Yiheyuan解讀頤和園, China: Contemporary Chinese Publishing當代中國出版社, p. 54.
  22. Turner, T.(2011). Asian Gardens: History, Beliefs and Design, New York: Routledge, p. 271.