DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

복숭아 과원에서 잡초방제방법이 신초 생육 및 수량에 미치는 영향

Effects on the Shoot Growth and Yield Related to Weed Control Methods at the Peach Orchard

  • 이성희 (충청북도농업기술원 연구개발국) ;
  • 이기열 (충청북도농업기술원 연구개발국) ;
  • 이재웅 (충청북도농업기술원 연구개발국) ;
  • 신현만 (충청북도농업기술원 연구개발국) ;
  • 강보구 (충청북도농업기술원 연구개발국) ;
  • 박용석 (바이엘 크롭 사이언스(주)) ;
  • 이정득 (바이엘 크롭 사이언스(주))
  • Lee, Sung-Hee (Bureau of Reasearch & Development, Chungcheongbuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Service) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Yeol (Bureau of Reasearch & Development, Chungcheongbuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Service) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Wung (Bureau of Reasearch & Development, Chungcheongbuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Service) ;
  • Shin, Hyun-Man (Bureau of Reasearch & Development, Chungcheongbuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Service) ;
  • Kang, Bo-Goo (Bureau of Reasearch & Development, Chungcheongbuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Service) ;
  • Park, Yong-Seok (Bayer CropScience Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Deug (Bayer CropScience Ltd.)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.04
  • 심사 : 2015.06.19
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30

초록

본 시험은 복숭아 과원 잡초방제 방법별 신초 생육과 수량에 미치는 영향을 비교하고자 수행하였다. 1차 처리 후 10일 간격 3회 조사한 결과, 제초제(glufosinate ammonium) 2회 및 3회 처리구의 잡초방제 효과는 10일째 98.2~98.6%, 20일째 77.5~78.2%, 30일째 40.7~41.4%로 나타났고 부직포 처리구는 100%, 100%, 97.5%이었으며, 기계예초 처리구는 92.1%, 56.4%, 36.4%이었다. 수확 전과 후의 신초 생육량을 비교한 결과, 제초제 2회 및 3회 처리구, 부직포 피복구, 기계예초 처리구 모두 무처리보다 전반적으로 생육이 좋았다. 평균 정형과수는 제초제 2회 처리구와 기계예초 처리구가 무처리와 비교하여 통계적으로 차이가 인정되었다. 따라서, 제초제 2회 또는 3회 살포가 복숭아 과원에서 조사된 14종의 모든 초종에 탁월한 방제효과와 더불어 복숭아나무의 수체 생육과 정형과수 확보에 있어 지장이 없기 때문에 향후 활용가치가 높다고 판단한다.

We studied to compare with the effect on the shoot growth and yield relavant to weed control methods in peach. As the results about 10 day intervals and 3 times investigation after each primary treatment, treatment plot of 2 times and 3 times with the herbicide, glufosinate ammonium, were 98.2~98.6% into $10^{th}$ day, 78.6~79.6% into $20^{th}$ day, 40.7~41.1% into $30^{th}$ day, fabric covering treatment showed 100%, 100% and 97.5% and treatment plot of machinery weeding were 92.1%, 56.4% and 36.4%, respectively. Also, we compared shoot growth for pre- and post-harvest. In the results, most of weed control methods showed better growth than control. Thus, the average number of standard fruits for treatment plot of 2 times with the herbicide and that of machinery weeding was different significantly in relation to control. Therefore, we think that the herbicide henceforth is well worth the application because treatment of 2 times or 3 times with the herbicide showed significant the control effect against all of 14 weed species surveyed in peach orchard and thus no inhibition for growth and number of standard fruits in peach trees.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cheong, D. C., J. M. Oh, H. C. Lim, Y. J. Song and J. M. Kim (2011) Effect of soil mulching materials and methods on weed occurring for the growth and flowering in Gypsophila paniculata cultivation. Flower Res. J. 19(1):15-21.
  2. Choi, S. Y. (2000) The effect of mulching material on the shoot and root growth and fruit quality of 'Fuji'/M.26 apple. J. Soc. Hort. Sci. 41:512-516.
  3. Guh, J. O., S. K. Chang, D. J. Lee, I. B. Im, O. D. Kwon, Y. I. Kuk, S. U. Chon and S. U. Han (2002) Weed flora of Korea. Korea agriculture system Association. 862p.
  4. Holm, L., D. Plucknett, J. Pancho and J. Herberger (1977) The world's worst weeds: distribution and biology. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. xii 609p.
  5. Korea Crop Protection Association (KCPA) (2012) User's manual of pesticides. 1351p.
  6. Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI) (2013) Agricultual outlook 2013(II) Trend and prospect of fruit supply. pp.258-262.
  7. Kim, I. S., S. Y. Kim, C. D. Choi and B. S. Choi (2001) Effects of black polypropylene mulching on weed control and peach growth in peach orchard. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 42:197-200.
  8. Kim, Y. S., Y. B. Jeon, H. J. Choi, S. M. Kim and S. M. Kim (2006) Effects of glufosinate-ammonium to earthworms, soil microorganisms and crops. Kor. J. of Pestic. Sci. 10(2):76-83.
  9. Kyung Nong (2013) An illustrated speciality book of Korea upland weeds in 2013. 158p.
  10. Lee, I. Y., C. S. Kim, B. C. Moon, J. E. Park and S. M. Oh (2010a) Suggestion of abbreviation for Korean weeds name. Kor. J. Weed Sci. 30(3):308-321. https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2010.30.3.308
  11. Lee, K. -Y., S. -K. Kim, J. -W. Lee, Y. -S. Lee, S. -H. Lee, E. -Y. Hong and Y. -S. Park (2013) Effects of yield and the grape growth each of weed control methods on at the vineyard in Chungbuk province. Kor. J. of Pestic. Sci. 17(1):20-26. https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2013.17.1.20
  12. Lee, S. H., H. S. Lee and E. H. Hong (1999) Development of herbicide-resistant soybean and its production. Kor. J. Soybean Soc. 16(1):31-39.
  13. Lee, I. Y., Y. S. Park, S. M. Kim, C. A. Kang, B. C. Chun and J. E. Park (2010b) The effect of apple tree growth and apple yield from the misuse of non selective herbicide, glufosinate-ammonium. Kor. J. Weed Sci. 30(4):454-459. https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2010.30.4.454
  14. Park, J. E., I. Y. Lee, S. M. Oh, T. S. Park, C. S. Kim, B. C. Moon, J. R. Cho, S. T. Lim, I. B. Im, J. G. Kang, S. Kim, J. B. Hwang, S. B. Song, S. H. Ji, D. S. Kang and K. R. Chung (2005) Characteristics of weed flora and weed community on orchard field in the Korea. Kor. J. Weed Sci. 25(4):267-274.
  15. Rural Development Administration (RDA) (2013) Standard agricultural textbook of peachculture. 295p.
  16. Rural Development Administration (RDA) (2012) Standard research and analysis of agricultural science. pp.619-642.
  17. Walsh, B. D., S. Salmins, D. J. Buszard and A. F. Mackenzie (1996) impact of soil management systems on organic dwarf apple orchards and soil aggregate stability, bulk density, temperature, and water content. Can. j. Soil Sci. 76:203-209. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss96-028
  18. Yeon, K. B. (1991) Survey of weed population and species in upland crop fileds in Korea and publication of an illustrated book of Korea upland weeds. The Ministry of Science-Technology.

피인용 문헌

  1. 충북지역 과수원 발생 잡초 분포 현황 vol.5, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5660/wts.2016.5.2.71