DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Current Status and Future Tasks of the Landscape Resources Survey in Korea

국내 경관자원 조사 현황과 향후 과제

  • Joo, Shin-Ha (Dept. of Horticulture, Biotechnology & Landscape Architecture, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Shin, Yunji (Dept. of Horticulture, Graduate School of Seoul Women's University)
  • 주신하 (서울여자대학교 원예생명조경학과) ;
  • 신윤지 (서울여자대학교 대학원 원예학과)
  • Received : 2015.02.09
  • Accepted : 2015.05.29
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

This study reviews the current status of the Korean landscape resources survey and foreign cases in order to determine the meaning and importance of it. Several cases are compared based on the evaluation method, the evaluation criteria and the application plan. Twelve domestic cases of landscape resources survey are reviewed to understand the current status and limitations of the Korean status, and 5 foreign cases to determine the implications for the Korean system. As the result of the analysis, some implications are drawn for domestic landscape resource system. First of all, it is suggested to establish more objective criteria to evaluate and select landscape resources. Various values of landscape resources should be included into the criteria and more people, as well as experts, should participate to reflect local conditions. Secondly, the management for the landscape resources must be implemented continuously. It is important to introduce a periodic reassessment system and to construct and manage a database of the landscape resources. Lastly, the landscape resource system should be integrated into other programs such as an environmental impact assessment and landscape planning. For a better landscape resource management system and efficient evaluation, resources should be comprehensively managed including various landscape types. It is essential to establish supporting policies and legislation. This research covered only the current status of the landscape resource survey and reviewed a limited number of foreign cases. Despite these limitations, it is meaningful for showing the importance of landscape resource management and to suggest some future tasks for better landscape resources management.

본 연구는 국내의 경관자원에 대한 유형별 평가 현황과 해외 경관자원 평가사례를 비교분석을 통하여, 경관자원 평가 체계에 있어 평가방법, 평가기준, 활용방안 등을 통합적으로 검토하고, 이를 토대로 국내 경관자원 평가의 의미와 중요성 등을 파악을 하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 경관자원의 정의와 유형을 검토하고, 경관자원에 관한 평가방법과 활용방안에 관한 연구동향을 살펴보았다. 또한, 12개 국내 경관자원 조사 및 평가 사례 비교를 통해서 우리나라 경관자원 관련 조사의 현황과 문제점을 살펴보았으며, 5개의 외국 사례 분석을 통해 우리나라 경관자원 관리체계에 시사점을 도출하였다. 분석결과, 12개의 국내 경관자원 조사 현황과 향후 과제로 다음과 같이 크게 세 가지로 종합하였다. 첫째, 경관자원 조사 기준이나 선정 절차에 있어 보다 객관적인 기준마련이 필요하다는 것이다. 경관자원의 다양한 가치를 포함하고, 지역민들의 참여를 확대하며, 명확한 평가기준 제시가 매우 중요하다. 두 번째로는, 경관자원의 관리가 지속적으로 이루어질 수 있는 체계를 갖추어야 한다는 것이다. 경관자원에 대한 재평가제도나 데이터베이스를 구축한 체계적인 관리를 통하여 경관자원을 지속적으로 관리하도록 하는 것이 중요한 것으로 파악되었다. 마지막으로 이러한 조사된 경관자원을 영향평가나 경관계획과 같은 다른 제도에서 활용할 수 있도록 제도화하는 것이 필요하다. 이를 위해서는 여러 가지 유형의 경관자원을 포함한 종합적인 경관관리가 필요하며, 이를 뒷받침하기 위한 제도를 갖추어야 할 것이다. 본 연구는 현재까지 진행된 경관자원 조사에 대한 현황 파악과 해외사례 검토를 통한 시사점 도출에 그치고 있어서 구체적인 방안을 제시하지 못하는 한계가 있으나, 국내외 경관자원 조사현황을 분석하여 경관자원에 대한 평가방법, 기준, 활용방안 등을 파악을 통하여 향후 경관자원관리를 위한 과제를 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다고 하겠다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, D. M., S. R. Ahn and Y. H. Jin(1990) A study on the wild and scenic rivers system(I) -American experience, and suggestions for system building in Korea-. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 18(3): 57-70.
  2. Bahk, H. C., S. C. Lee, S. H. Jeong, S. J. Lee, S. J. Kim and H. J. Park(2010) A study of the shift and the difference in perceptions on urban landscape of Seoul. Journal of the Seoul Institute 11(4): 33-49.
  3. Han, K. S.(1999) Development of Rural Resources Evaluation System on the Village Level. Ph. D. Dissertation. Chonnam National University. Korea.
  4. Han, S. H.(2003) Landscape Information Acquisition and Visualization Technique in the Rural Landscape Planning. A Master Thesis. Chonnam National University. Korea.
  5. Hwang, I. S.(2007) An Introductory Study on the Development of Scenic Byway. Changwon: Gyeongnam Development Institute.
  6. Joo, S. H.(2014) The current status and limitations of the national landscape resource system, The estimation and current status of the national landscape resource : Proceeding of the Symposium for the National Landscape Policy. pp. 73-88.
  7. Joo, S. H. and Y. H. Kim(2010) A study on the present condition of landscape planning by the landscape law. Journal of Korea Landscape Council 2(2): 20-31.
  8. Kim, G. Y.(2012) Analysis of Citizen's Cognition for Landscape Resources in Daegu City. A Master Thesis. Catholic University of Daegu. Daegu. Korea.
  9. Kim, H. C., J. H. Park, S. I. Jang, J. H. Jeong, J. E. Gang and C. W. Oh(2008) Development of an Assessment Method for Scenic Road. Suwon: Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  10. Kim, H. H.(2011) A Study on Policeman Resources Recognition Characteristic by the Participation Subject: Focusing on Andong City. A Master Thesis. Daegu University. Daegu. Korea.
  11. Kim, S. B., S. J. Lee and S. Y. Lee(2008) Landscape design for the rural village - A case study of Naegokri, Yeohang-myoen, Hamangun. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 14(1): 59-71.
  12. Kim, S. H.(2011) A Study on Landscape Planning System in Rural Village Area: Focused on Resource Investigation and Evaluation. Ph. D. Dissertation. Seoul National University. Seoul. Korea.
  13. Korea Forest Research Institute(2012) The Survey and Landscape Planning for the Forest Landscape Resources. Seoul.
  14. Lee, J. W., J. O. Yoon and S. B. Im(2010) A study on a research method measuring rural landscape resources by inhabitants participation: Focused on a case study using landscape evaluation map. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 16(4): 13-22.
  15. Ministry of Security and Public Administration, Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea Forest Service(2014) The Guideline for Landscape Planning.
  16. Park, E. Y. and B. R. Yoo(2009) Master plan for Jeju Sanghyo botanical garden using local landscape resources. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 15(4): 173-182.
  17. Park, M. H. and S. W. Yang(2014) An Analysis on the Landscape Resources and View Points in Seoul by the Internet Photos. Seoul: The Seoul Institute.
  18. Park, S. M.(2011) A Study on Characteristic Analysis of Regional Resources for Setting Up Landscape Design Plans. A Master Thesis. Kyungpook National University. Daegu. Korea.
  19. Rural Research Institute(2003) A Study of the Policy for Rural Landscape Houses and Remodeling of the Rural Villages. Sejong: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  20. Song, T. G. and S. B. Kim(2012) An effective scenery improvement plan considering resource characteristic of forest landscape: Focusing on Jeollanam-do. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 37(2): 23-38.
  21. U.S. Department of Interior(1979) Some Things You should Know about National Wild and Scenic Rivers Designation, Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service.
  22. http://whc.unesco.org/, UNESCO World Heritage.
  23. http://www.bywaysonline.org/, National Scenic Byway.
  24. http://www.fao.org/giahs/en, Globally Important Agricultural Heritage systems (GIAHS).
  25. http://www.forest.go.kr/newkfsweb/kfi/kfs/foreston/main/contents/FmmntSrch/selectFmmntSrchList.do?mn=KFS_01_04_02_01&orgId=fon
  26. http://www.knps.or.kr/knpshp/add/apps/apps02.html, Top 100 Natural Wonders in Korea.
  27. http://www.naas.go.kr/amenity/, Survey of the Rural Amenity Resources.
  28. http://www.rivers.gov/, National Wild and Scenic Rivers.
  29. http://www.seoul.go.kr/seoul/seoul_gallery/photogallery/prospect50/list01.html, Great View Points in Seoul.