DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the Marginal Fitness of Ceramic Co-Cr Metal Crown

도재용 코발트-크롬 금속관의 변연적합도 비교

  • Jeon, Byung-Wook (Dept. of Dental Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Kim, Bu-Sob (Dept. of Dental Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 전병욱 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과, 치과기공기재학회) ;
  • 김부섭 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과, 치과기공기재학회)
  • Received : 2015.04.30
  • Accepted : 2015.06.23
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the marginal fitness of ceramic Co-Cr metal crown made by precision casting, milling, and selective laser melting method were compared. Methods: The ceramic Co-Cr metal crown manufactured by precision casting used the lost wax(LC specimen) method. The abutment were scanned and then made by milling(CM specimen), selective laser melting(CS specimen) method. The specimen were cut bucco-lingual and mesio-distal, and absolute marginal discrepancy and marginal gap were measured using a digital microscope. The surface roughness of the crown was also observed. Results: On the bucco-lingual axial, absolute marginal discrepancy was the LC specimen $31.72({\pm}4.58){\mu}m$, the CM specimen $78.29({\pm}3.28){\mu}m$ and the CS specimen $143.13({\pm}3.83){\mu}m$, respectively. On the bucco-lingual axial, marginal gap was the LC specimen $22.70({\pm}1.46){\mu}m$, the CM specimen $22.70({\pm}1.49){\mu}m$ and CS specimen $99.60({\pm}1.57){\mu}m$, respectively. Conclusion: For ceramic Co-Cr metal crowns, LC specimen was superior for absolute marginal discrepancy and marginal gap. The surface of metal crowns by selective laser melting were the roughest.

Keywords

References

  1. Bader JD, Rozier RG, McFall W Jr, Ramsey D. Effect of crown marginal on periodontal conditions in regularly attending patients. J Prosthet Dent, 65(1), 75-79, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90053-Y
  2. Ben Vandenbroucke, Jean-Pierre Kruth. Selective laser melting of biocompatible metals for rapid manufacturing of medical parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(4), 196-203, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540710776142
  3. Besimo C, Jeger C, Guggenheim R. Marginal adaptation of titanium frameworks produced by Cad/Cam techniques. Int J Prosthodont, 10(6), 541-546, 1997.
  4. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera Allceramc Crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 84(4), 419-424, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109125
  5. Chan DC, Blackman R, Kaiser DA, Chung K. The effect of sprue design on the marginal accuracy of titanium casting. J Oral Rehabil, 25(6), 424-429, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00268.x
  6. Choi UJ, Shin MH, Kim YS. A study on the castability of base metal alloys which sprue shape and materials used in the production of dental prosdonties. Kor Aca Den Tech, 21(1), 83-92, 1999.
  7. Chung DW, Yang HS. The effect of casting machine and investment on the castability of titanium alloy. J Kor Acad Prosthodont, 44(5), 654-664, 2006.
  8. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent, 65(3), 357-364, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90225-L
  9. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Suilik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent, 62(4), 405-408, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  10. Huh JB, Park CG, Kim HY, Park CK, Shin SW. Evaluation using replica technique on the marginal and internal fitness of zirconia cores by several CAD/CAM systems. J Kor Acad Prosthodont, 48(2), 135-142, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.2.135
  11. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two type of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent, 63(1), 26-31, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
  12. Kim CY, Chung IS, Choi SM. Effects of property transformation and marginal gap depending on heat-treatment of metal-porcelain by gold electro-forming system. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(6), 352-359, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.6.352
  13. Kim NJ, Hwang KS, Park YD. A comparison of marginal fitness by dental alloys. J Kor Aca Den Tech, 25(1), 29-40, 2003.
  14. Kim SJ, Jo KH, Lee KB. A comparison of the fidelity of various zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM systems. J Kor Acad Prosthodont, 47(2), 148-155, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.2.148
  15. McLean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J, 131(3), 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  16. McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years experience in general practice. Br Dent J, 132(1), 9-15, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802795
  17. Mitchem JC, Wagner PC, Ferracane JL. Marginal adaptation of the concept inlay system. Am J Dent, 7(5), 232-234, 1994.
  18. Mormann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC2 CAD-CAM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc, 128(1), 47-53, 1997. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0025
  19. Oh MS, Yoon IN, Baek DK. Study of the thermal deflection error and the deflection error induced by the cutting force. Journal of the Korean society of industrial application, 5(4), 373-378, 2002.
  20. Oh SY, Vang MD, Yang HS, Park SW, Park HO. The study about the marginal fit of the casting titanium and machine-milled titanium coping. J Kor Acad Prosthodont, 44(1), 20-28, 2006.
  21. Ryu SY, Lim JH, Cho IH. A study on the color stability of porcelain fused to metal crown. J Kor Acad Prosthodont, 38(1), 73-84, 2000.
  22. Song Yong Ak. State of the Art in Laser-Assisted Rapid Prototyping of Metallic Parts. Journal of KWS, 17(3), 8-12, 1999.
  23. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using secondgeneration CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent, 11(4), 206-214, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00400.x
  24. Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effect of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent, 67(6), 786-790, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90583-V