Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Restructuring of Appreciative inquiry process based on Systems theory : Finding a way for a sustainable school community

시스템 이론에 기반 한 긍정탐색(appreciative inquiry)프로세스 재구조화 : 지속가능한 학교공동체 형성을 위한 방법론으로

  • Received : 2015.01.31
  • Accepted : 2015.05.07
  • Published : 2015.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Appreciative inquiry is applicable to schools to minimize the resistance of the members, and the subject of the school community Forming is suitable for the introduction of an AI program. But to become a way for a sustainable school community we must reconstruct the 4D modes of appreciative inquiry that the members can be applied as needed. In this paper, we propose the process of seven steps core learning activities based on systems theory. Seven steps are selecting a theme, interviewing for finding success story, analyzing an organization's success stories and deriving the core values, deriving future of the organization, sharing future of the organization, designing the ideal future of the organization consist of a practice. Since the proposed seven steps process is based on the literature it is necessary to apply follow-up study is to verify the result, and a variety of research methods for process improvement in AI.

긍정탐색은 기존 학교 조직에 구성원들의 저항을 최소화 하여 적용할 수 있으며, 학교공동체 형성이라는 주제는 긍정탐색 프로그램을 도입하기에 적절하다. 그러나 긍정탐색법이 지속가능한 학교 공동체 형성을 위한 방법론으로 자리 잡기 위해서는 조직 구성원들이 필요할 때 적용할 수 있도록 4D 프로세스를 재구성 하는 것이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 시스템 이론에서 제안하고 있는 프로세스의 전체성, 연동성에 기반하여 학습자의 핵심 활동프로세스를 중심으로 하는 7단계의 학습자 핵심학습활동 중심의 프로세스를 제안하였다. 주제선정, 성공 스토리 탐색을 위한 인터뷰하기, 성공 스토리 분석 및 핵심가치 도출, 조직의 미래모습 도출, 조직의 미래모습을 구체화하여 공유하기, 이상적인 미래조직 설계하기, 실현하기가 그것이다. 제안한 프로세스는 문헌연구를 기반으로 하고 있으므로 후속 연구를 통해 교수설계를 실시하고 이를 현장에 적용하여 그 결과를 점검하고, 지속적인 문헌 연구와 전문가 검토를 통해 제안한 학습자 핵심활동 중심의 긍정탐색 프로세스에 대해서도 수정 보완하는 작업이 계속되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cooperrider, D. L., Appreciative Inquiry; Toward a Methodology for Understanding and Enhancing Organizational Innovation, Unpublished PH. D., Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 1986.
  2. Cooperrider, D. L. & Whitney, D., "Appreciative Inquiry in organizational life" Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1(1), p.129-169, 1987.
  3. Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., Stavros, J. M., Appreciative Inquiry Handbook(2nd ed.). Brunswick, OH: Crown Custom Publishing, Inc, 2008.
  4. Yballe, L. & O'connor, D., Appreciative pedagogy: Constructing positive models for learning. Journal of Management Education. 24(4), 474-483, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105256290002400406
  5. Conklin, T. A., Creating classroom of preference- An exercise in appreciative inquiry. Journal of Management Education. 33(6), p.772-702, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1052562909333888
  6. Preziosi, R. C. & Gooden, D, J., Using appreciative learning in executive education. New Horizons in Adult Education, 16(1), 10-16, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10137
  7. Luckcock, T. The soul of teaching and professional learning: an appreciative inquiry into the Enneagram of reflective practice, Educational Action Research, 51(1), 127-145, 2006.
  8. Jang, G. W., The development of a program for improving teaching competency based on appreciative inquiry, The Journal of Yeolin Education, 20(2), 157-186, 2012.
  9. Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology. Science 3: 23-29, 1950. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.111.2872.23
  10. Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. General Systems Theory - A Critical Review. General Systems 7: 1-20, 1962.
  11. Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. General Systems Theory . N. Y: George Bargiller, 1968.
  12. Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. A Systems View of Man edited by Paul A. LaViolette. Denver, CO: Westview, 1981.
  13. Banathy, B. H. Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publication. 1991.
  14. Banathy, B. H. A systems view of education: Concepts and principles for effective practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publication. 1992.
  15. Park, S. H. Beyond the controversy between systemic and systematic: Dual Structured Instructional System, Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 157-174, 2002. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.18.2.157
  16. Park, S. H. A conceptual proposition of Learning process reengineering, The Journal of The Korean Research Institute of Education and Information, 1(2), 5-22, 2003.
  17. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.). In Instructional design theories and models, Vol II: In new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 161-182, 1999.
  18. Schank, R. C. Designing world-class E-Learning. NY: McGraw-Hill. 2002
  19. Hammer, M. Beyond the reengineering: process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. NY: HarperCollins Publishers. 1996.
  20. Watkins, J. M., Mohr, B. & Kelly, R. Appreciative Inquiry: Change at the Speed of imagination. Second edition, SF: Pfeiffer. 2011