DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the Supporting Program for Integrated Rehabilitation of Deteriorated Public Housing Blocks : Focused on the HOPE SF in San Francisco

노후 공공주택단지의 통합적 재생을 위한 지원제도에 관한 연구 : 샌프란시스코시 HOPE SF 프로그램을 중심으로

  • Received : 2014.12.17
  • Accepted : 2015.04.09
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to draw out implications and directions for improvements on national public rental housing policy by examining SF's public rental housing policy and conditions for low income households, and analyzing 'multilateral considerations for residents and communities' and 'concrete case and policy for support' which are discovered in process of re-development of large-scale public housing revitalization. The results were as follows: First of all, HOPE SF ensures to involve resident as participant in entire project considering exist communities and resettlement of resident. Secondly, HOPE SF supported to enhance the lives of existing residents and their community through integrated support system. Thirdly, HOPE SF collaborated with various participants as partner of city's rehabilitation, thus, invite community opinion to build a sense of cohesion. And for last, HOPE SF tried to create a new financial model for sustainable and practicable rehabilitation.

본 연구의 목적은 샌프란시스코시의 HOPE SF 제도를 대상으로 공공임대주택단지 재정비시 커뮤니티에 대한 종합적 재생을 도모한 제도의 내용과 사례를 분석함으로써 국내 제도개선에 시사점을 도출하는데 있다. 그러나 HOPE SF를 통한 단지 재생은 진행형인 점에서 현재 구체적인 결과를 파악하기에 어려움이 있어, 프로그램의 특징 및 내용은 샌프란시스코 시의 공공임대주택제도와 HOPE SF를 연계하여 분석하되 사례의 경우 HOPE SF를 중심으로 살펴봄으로써 정책 변화과정 및 사업 특징을 이해하고자 했다. 본 논문의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 주민의 모든 단계 참여를 도모하여 재정착을 돕고 커뮤니티의 훼손을 막고자 했다. 둘째, 소득계층 혼합을 통해 주변과 통합적 연계를 유도하였다. 셋째, 주민의 사회경제적 자립과 생활을 위한 실질적 지원을 제공하였다. 넷째, 여러 민관 주체를 연계하여 지역사회의 관심을 환기하였다. 다섯째, 다양한 재정 지원 및 수익창출형 정비 계획을 실시하여 지속가능한 재생을 유도하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. S.Kim, Overview of American Housing Policy for Low-income Groups, KRIHS Research Report, 2006.
  2. C. Orlebeke,The Evolution of Low-Income Housing Policy, 1949 to 1999. Housing Policy Debate, 11(2), p.489-520, 2009.
  3. http://sfha.org/, (2014.7.24.)
  4. http://sf-moh.org/, (2014.7.24)
  5. G.Lee,Y.Jung & S.Kim, A Study on the Public Rental Housing Policy, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 27(2), p.123-134, 2011.
  6. D.P.Jutte, K.Z.LeWinn, M.A.Hutson,R.Dare & J.Falk, Bringing researchers and community developers together to revitalize a public housing project and improve health. Health Affairs, 30(11), p.2072-2078, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0701
  7. E.Kersten, K. LeWinn, L. Gottlieb, D. Jutte, N. Adler, San Francisco Children Living In Redeveloped Public Housing Used Acute Services Less Than Children In Older Public Housing, Health Affairs, Project HOPE-The People-to-People Health Foundation, 33(12), p. 2230-2237, 2014.
  8. S.Kyung, H.Kim, The Outcomes and Challenges of Neighbourhood Renewal Programmes in the US, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 74, p.233-248, 2012. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2012.74..014
  9. HOPE SF, http://hope-sf.org/(2014.9.21)
  10. http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/about/admguide/history.cfm, Housing Act of 1949, 2014.11
  11. HOPE SF Forum:"What's New With HOPE SF?",HOPE SF Forum, 2014.8
  12. Hunters view Partners, Overall Site Plan, 2009.
  13. N.Cytron, San Francisco's new model for mixedincome housing: HOPE SF. Community Investments, p.31-34, 2009.
  14. E.Gerth,Serving Public Housing Residents in San Francisco, Human Services Agency and Mayor's Office of Housing, City and County of San Francisco, 2012.
  15. C.Page ,hope. Hastings Center Report, 37(6), p.1-12, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2007.0031
  16. HOPE SF, http://hope-sf.org/(2014.9.21)
  17. Hunters view, http://huntersview.info/(2014.9.21)
  18. Hunters view Partners, Design for Development, 2009. (2014.09.21.)