Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.4.2807

A study on the Supporting Program for Integrated Rehabilitation of Deteriorated Public Housing Blocks : Focused on the HOPE SF in San Francisco  

Yoon, Hye-Yeong (Incheon Development Institute)
Yoo, Hae-Yeon (School of Architecture, Soongsil University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.16, no.4, 2015 , pp. 2807-2817 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to draw out implications and directions for improvements on national public rental housing policy by examining SF's public rental housing policy and conditions for low income households, and analyzing 'multilateral considerations for residents and communities' and 'concrete case and policy for support' which are discovered in process of re-development of large-scale public housing revitalization. The results were as follows: First of all, HOPE SF ensures to involve resident as participant in entire project considering exist communities and resettlement of resident. Secondly, HOPE SF supported to enhance the lives of existing residents and their community through integrated support system. Thirdly, HOPE SF collaborated with various participants as partner of city's rehabilitation, thus, invite community opinion to build a sense of cohesion. And for last, HOPE SF tried to create a new financial model for sustainable and practicable rehabilitation.
Keywords
Community Revitalization; Deteriorated Area; HOPE SF; Public Housing Block;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 S.Kim, Overview of American Housing Policy for Low-income Groups, KRIHS Research Report, 2006.
2 C. Orlebeke,The Evolution of Low-Income Housing Policy, 1949 to 1999. Housing Policy Debate, 11(2), p.489-520, 2009.
3 http://sfha.org/, (2014.7.24.)
4 http://sf-moh.org/, (2014.7.24)
5 G.Lee,Y.Jung & S.Kim, A Study on the Public Rental Housing Policy, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 27(2), p.123-134, 2011.
6 D.P.Jutte, K.Z.LeWinn, M.A.Hutson,R.Dare & J.Falk, Bringing researchers and community developers together to revitalize a public housing project and improve health. Health Affairs, 30(11), p.2072-2078, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0701   DOI
7 E.Kersten, K. LeWinn, L. Gottlieb, D. Jutte, N. Adler, San Francisco Children Living In Redeveloped Public Housing Used Acute Services Less Than Children In Older Public Housing, Health Affairs, Project HOPE-The People-to-People Health Foundation, 33(12), p. 2230-2237, 2014.
8 S.Kyung, H.Kim, The Outcomes and Challenges of Neighbourhood Renewal Programmes in the US, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 74, p.233-248, 2012.   DOI
9 HOPE SF, http://hope-sf.org/(2014.9.21)
10 http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/about/admguide/history.cfm, Housing Act of 1949, 2014.11
11 HOPE SF Forum:"What's New With HOPE SF?",HOPE SF Forum, 2014.8
12 Hunters view Partners, Overall Site Plan, 2009.
13 N.Cytron, San Francisco's new model for mixedincome housing: HOPE SF. Community Investments, p.31-34, 2009.
14 E.Gerth,Serving Public Housing Residents in San Francisco, Human Services Agency and Mayor's Office of Housing, City and County of San Francisco, 2012.
15 C.Page ,hope. Hastings Center Report, 37(6), p.1-12, 2007.   DOI
16 HOPE SF, http://hope-sf.org/(2014.9.21)
17 Hunters view, http://huntersview.info/(2014.9.21)
18 Hunters view Partners, Design for Development, 2009. (2014.09.21.)