Intraspecific Phylogeny of the Korean Water Deer, Hydropotes inermis argyropus (Artiodactyla, Cervidae)

Abstract

The water deer, Hydropotes inermis (Cervidae), is native to China and Korea and has two subspecies of the Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis inermis) and Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus). To date, only the Korean water deer has been reported in South Korea. In this study, however, an intraspecific phylogeny and haplotype analysis based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I indicated that both Korean and Chinese water deer are found in South Korea. The populations of the two Korean genetic lineages did not show distinct geographic distributions. Further morphological studies on the Korean water deer will be required to confirm its taxonomic status.

INTRODUCTION

The water deer, Hydropotes inermis (Cervidae), is native to China and Korea and has two of subspecies of the Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis inermis) and Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) (Grubb, 2005; Harris and Duckworth, 2008). The Chinese water deer is distributed to only the lower Yangtze Basin (Xu et al., 1996; Wang, 1998; Hu et al., 2006), and it is listed as a vulnerable species in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Harris and Duckworth, 2008) and the China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals (Wang, 1998). In contrast, the Korean water deer is widely distributed throughout the forests of South Korea, and it has been designated as a wildlife pest by the Korean Ministry of Environment.

According to morphological studies (Allen, 1940; Won, 1967; Won and Smith, 1999), only the Korean subspecies has been recognized in South Korea to date. However, a recent analysis of the mitochondrial Cyt b gene and its control region (Koh et al., 2009) suggested the presence of two genetic lineages in Korean water deer populations, and one of these lineages was grouped with the Chinese subspecies.

The objective of the present study was to confirm the presence of the two genetic lineages in the Korean populations by analyzing mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene sequences. We analyzed the intraspecific relationships in Korean water deer by using tissues collected from 18 road-killed individuals from two northern forests (SC: Sokcho, YG: Yanggu and HC: Hongcheon) and one southern forest (JR: Jirisan National Park) of South Korea (Table 1, Fig. 1A). Genomic DNA was extracted from the tissue samples by using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), and amplified using the InnoTM Taq DNA polymerase kit (Bookyung S∙M, Korea). Primers for PCR amplification of mitochondrial COI gene was performed were Deer F (5′-TTCATTAACCGCTGATTATTTTCAAC-3′) and Deer R (5′-CACGATATGAGAAATTATACCAAACC-3′). This amplification procedure yielded 680-bp fragments of the COI gene; these were aligned using the Clustal-X program package (Thompson et al., 1997) and manually edited using SeA l 1.0a (Rambaut, 1996).

Table 1.aThe sequences of Chinese water deer and Eurasian elk were obtained from the GenBank.

Fig. 1.A, Collection localities for the Korean water deer. Further information on the samples is provided in Table 1; B, Intraspecific phylogeny of Korean and Chinese water deer inferred from the neighbor-joining (NJ) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses, based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene sequences (680 bp). Only the NJ tree is shown in the figure, and the numbers at each node indicate the bootstrap values for the NJ tree (left) and posterior probabilities (shown as percentages) for the BI tree (right). Alces alces and Elaphodus cephalophus were used as outgroup species. The Korean water deer formed two separate clades, regardless of the collection localities.

Intraspecific phylogeny was inferred by neighbor-joining (NJ) implemented in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2003) and Bayesian inference (BI) using MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al., 2012). The NJ tree was generated using the K2P model, and the robustness of the tree was tested with 1,000 pseudoreplications. For the BI analysis, the HKY model was selected as the best-fit model under the Akaike Information Criterion(AIC) by using Modeltest 3.7 (Posada and Crandall, 1998). The BI analysis was performed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo technique (MCMC) and one sample every 500 generations was used. The first 25% from each run was discarded as burn-in.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The NJ and BI analyses generated similar trees with identical topologies, with greater support for the NJ tree than the BI tree. The analyses confirmed that Korean water deer could be separated into two phylogroups (Fig. 1B), one of which clustered with the Chinese water deer (JIN, ZH1, and ZH2). This result is consistent with that of a previous study that analyzed the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and its control region and concluded that some Korean populations might belong to the Chinese water deer (Koh et al., 2009). Two haplotypes (KH1 and KH2) were found in Korean water deer (Fig. 2). The nucleotide sequence of the KH1 haplotype did not differ from that of the Chinese CH1 haplotype. The K2P distance between the Korean KH1 and KH2 hap lotypes was 0.012, and it was considerably higher than the distance (0.000-0.005) between the Korean KH1 and two Chinese haplotypes (CH1 and CH2) (Table 2). Thus, the Korean water deer has at least two genetic lineages, namely, H. i. argyropus and another that may belong to the Chinese water deer, which was previously thought to be restricted to China. The populations of the two Korean genetic lineages did not show distinct geographic distributions (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 2.Haplotype patterns of Hydropotes inermis. In Korean water deer, two different haplotypes KH1 and KH2 were found; there was no sequence difference between KH1 and the Chinese CH1 haplotype.

Table 2.Pairwise genetic distances between the Korean and Chinese water deer haplotypes

We conclude from our intraspecific phylogeny and haplotype analysis based on the mitochondrial COI gene sequence that both the Chinese and Korean water deer are distributed across South Korea. Further morphological studies of the Korean water deer will be required to confirm this reassessment of its taxonomic status.