Introduction
Bacterial infection is one of constitute one of the greatest global challenges facing public healthcare today. Extensive efforts have been dedicated to the development of therapies for bacterial infections, including the continued development of antimicrobial materials, such as antibiotics, silver particles, photosensitizers, antimicrobial peptides, and hydrogels [9]. There has been a recent focus on producing natural medicines and other natural products. Several fruits and fruit extracts as well as arrowroot tea extract and caffeine exhibit antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli O157:H7. Plants with relatively high levels of antimicrobial activity may be sources of the compounds that inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens. Bacterial cells could be killed by rupture of cell walls and membranes and by irregular disruption of the intracellular matrix when treated with plant extracts [3].
Unpolished rice (UR), which is hulled directly from rough rice, consists of a bran layer (6−7% of its total weight), embryo (2−3%), and endosperm (approximately 90%). It is a better source of nutritional components, such as proteins, lipids, dietary fibers, vitamins, and minerals, than white rice. These nutrients exist mainly in the germ and bran layers of rice grains, which are mostly removed during the milling process that converts UR to white rice, the form that is typically consumed. UR is less desirable than white rice due to its poor cooking and eating qualities. Cooked brown rice is dark in appearance and unpalatable owing to its hard texture and chewiness, which are attributed to the tough fibrous bran layer. However, UR has a higher nutritional value [5]. Recently, human and animal studies have shown that UR consumption reduces the risk of type-2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, and these protective health effects have been linked to the presence of bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), acylated steryl β-glucoside, and γ-oryzanol [4, 6, 8, 12, 23].
In this study, we prepared a fermented slurry of unpolished rice (FSUR) and investigated its antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria and yeast. The antioxidant activity and the organic components of the FSUR were analyzed. Additionally, we performed microbial screening during the fermentation process.
Materials and Methods
FSUR Preparation
The mother brew (Mitsul) was prepared as follows: Polished rice (4 kg) was rinsed three times to remove impurities and soaked in water for 4 h until saturation. Excess water was removed, and the soaked rice was then steamed for about 40 min to allow full gelatinization. The steamed rice was cooled to 25℃, mixed with 2 kg of yeast leavening agent (Nuruk powder), and incubated at 32℃ for 2−3 days to allow saccharification.
Steamed rice cakes (Baekseolgi) were prepared as follows: UR (20 kg) was rinsed 3 times to remove impurities and soaked in water for 8 h until saturation; then, water was drained for 1 h. For the instant rice cakes, the crushed powder was steamed to prepare Baekseolgi.
A mixture (20 kg of Mitsul, 20 kg of Baekseolgi, 2 kg of Nuruk, and 50 L of water) was prepared and then incubated at 32℃ to reach an alcohol content of 12% [7]. The supernatant was removed and the precipitate was filtered using a 60-mesh sieve after dilution in 90 L of water. The FSUR was boiled for 10 min at 100℃.
Alcohol, pH, and total soluble solid content
The FSUR samples were subjected to various chemical analyses. The pH was measured using an Orion 420A pH Meter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The total soluble solid content was measured using a Brix Refractometer HI 96811 (Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA). The alcohol content was determined using a vinometer after distillation. One hundred milliliters of each sample was run through a distiller until a volume of approximately 70 ml was collected. The collected sample volume was adjusted to 100 ml by adding distilled water.
Free amino acid and componential analysis of FSUR
The components (sugar, organic acid, moisture, ash, and crude protein content) of FSUR were determined by a proximate composition analysis. Three types of sugar were measured (fructose, glucose, and sucrose) and four types of organic acid were measured (oxalic acid, lactic acid, acetic acid, and propionic acid). Free amino acids were analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with positive electrospray ionization and selected ion monitoring mode. This analysis was performed at the Biotechnology Industrialization Center (BIC; Dongshin University, Naju, Korea).
Culture conditions and isolation of microbial strains
To isolate microbial strains, 100 μl of FSUR was spread onto yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) agar medium (20.0 g/l peptone, 10.0 g/l yeast extract, 20.0 g/l glucose, and 20.0 g/l agar) and tryptic soy broth (TSB) agar medium (BD 211825; Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The plates were incubated at 30℃ for 2 days. Single colonies on the plates were purified by transferring them to fresh plates, followed by re-incubation [20]. Morphological characteristic was observed using a Gram Staining Kit (Fluka-77730, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Catalase activity was examined by measuring the production of oxygen bubbles in an aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution. To identify the carbon sources, the bacteria were grown on basal salt media [2] with maltose, mannitol, cellobiose, D-mannose, D-glucose, lactose, fructose, and D-arabinose at a final concentration of 2% [2].
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA gene
PCR was performed in a total reaction volume of 20 ml containing 14.2 μl of ddH2O, 2 μl of PCR buffer, 2 μl of dNTPs (2 mM), 0.5 μl of each primer (27F, 5'-AGAGTTTGATCMTGG-CTCAG-3' and 1492, 5'-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3' [22]), 1 μl of extracted DNA, and 0.3 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl) (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). PCR was performed using an MJ Research PTC 225 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) with the following PCR conditions: initial denaturation for 5 min at 94℃; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94℃, 30 s at 56℃, and 30 s at 72℃; extension of incomplete products for 10 min at 72℃; and cooling at 4℃. The sizes and quantities of the PCR products were determined using 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Limburg, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis was performed using an ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator Ready Reaction Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) and ABI 310 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Inc.).
Free radical scavenging activity of FSUR
The FSUR was screened for antioxidant activity using a 2,2-diphenyl-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging assay according to the methods of previous studies [21] with a few modifications. DPPH is a stable free radical that loses its absorbance at 517 nm when it is reduced. DPPH stock was prepared by dissolving 0.4 mM DPPH in 100 ml of absolute ethanol. FSUR samples (20 μl) were added to 180 μl of DPPH solution. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 517 nm after 30 min of incubation at 37℃ in the dark using a microplate spectrophotometer (Eon, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). A low absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated a high free radical scavenging activity. Ascorbic acid (1 mg/ml, 5 mM) was used as a positive control. The relative DPPH scavenging effect (estimated as a percentage) was calculated as follows [13, 14]:
DPPH scavenging effect (%) = Acont − Atest /Acont × 100
Antimicrobial activity of FSUR
Antimicrobial activity of FSUR was estimated using the agar well diffusion method. TSB and YPD agar were used throughout the investigation. The pathogens (S. aureus, E. coli, L. monocytogenes, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, Y. enterocolitica, G. intermedius, and L. elongisporus) were grown in TSB and YPD for 24 h. A 100-μl aliquot of each bacterial suspension was spread on a TSB agar plate and L. elongisporus was inoculated on the YPD agar plate [20]. FSUR and four organic acids (lactic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid, and propionic acid; 25 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) were added to paper discs (8 mm in diameter), which were placed on the surfaces of the inoculated agar plates and incubated at 37℃ for 18 h. The total diameter (mm) of the inhibition zone was measured for each microorganism [18]. Tetracycline (50 μg/ml) and carbenicillin (50 μg/ml) was used as a positive control. In order to clarify the effect of changes in acidity of FSUR on antimicrobial acitity, 100 mM KCl buffer (pH 3.0) was used as a control.
Results
Alcohol, pH, total soluble solid content, and component analysis of FSUR
The total soluble solid content of FSUR increased during fermentation, while the pH did not change. The alcohol content decreased (Table 1). Based on a component analysis of FSUR, three sugars, i.e., fructose, glucose, and sucrose, and three organic acids, i.e., lactic acid, acetic acid, and propionic acid, were detected (Table 2).
Table 1.Change of Alcohol, pH and total soluble sugar content during the fermentation of FSUR.
Table 2.Component analysis of FSUR.
Free amino acid analysis of FSUR
Amino acids are naturally occurring compounds that exist in a variety of food products, such as fish, alcoholic beverages, cheeses, and meat products. They play an important role in human metabolism as the building blocks of proteins, growth factors, or stabilizers of DNA and RNA [10]. The free amino acid content of FSUR was analyzed and the results are summarized in Table 3. A total of 18 amino acids were assessed. The total free amino acid content of FSUR was 922.4 ± 115.8 mg/ml. The total free amino acid contents of FSUR, except for glycine, tyrosine, and lysine, were higher than those reported by Joo et al. [11]. The levels of GABA in FSUR were similar to those reported by Caceres [4].
Table 3.Amino acid analysis of FSUR.
Identification of microorganisms isolated from FSUR
Four microorganisms were isolated from FSUR and were named fermented slurry of unpolished rice strain (FS)-1, -2, -3, and -4. FS-1 and -4 were gram-negative and rodshaped. FS-2 and -3 were gram-positive and rod-shaped. None of the four strains sporulated. Based on peptidoglycan types and a 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, FS-1, FS-2, FS-3, and FS-4 were homologous to G. intermedius, L. casei, L. plantarum, and A. peroxydans with 100, 100, 100, and 98% similarities (Fig. 1). The carbon source usage tests for the four strains were carried out using basal salt media (Table 4).
Fig. 1.Phylogenic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of four isolated microorganisms from FSUR. The tree was based on an alignment of 1,318 bp of 16s rRNA gene sequences, and constructed by the neighbor-joining method.
Table 4.a+; growth or presence, -; no growth or absence.
Free radical scavenging activity
Reactive oxygen species are generated via many pathways. Generally, free radicals are beneficial to cell immune systems. However, increasing evidence suggests that many uncontrolled reactions generating reactive oxygen species and oxygen-derived free radicals contribute to a variety of chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes mellitus, and arteriosclerosis [15]. As a result of DPPH assay, the radical scavenging activity of FSUR was 88.46 ± 1.30%. The antioxidant activity of FSUR determined was similar to that of ascorbic acid (1 mg/ml) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.Antioxidant activities of FSUR. The overall antioxidant activity of FSUR was assessed by the DPPH method. As a positive control, ascorbic acid (1 mg/ml) was used.
Antimicrobial activity of FSUR
The antimicrobial activities of FSUR and organic acids against eight microorganisms were examined using the paper disc diffusion method; the results of this analysis are summarized in Table 5. FSUR effectively inhibited the two gram-positive bacterial strains (S. aureus and P. aeruginosa), five gram-negative strains (E. coli, L. monocytogenes, S. typhimurium, Y. enterocolitica, and G. intermedius), and one fungal strain (L. elongisporus). FSUR produced a zone of inhibition ranging from 11 to 32 mm in diameter.
Table 5.Paper disk loaded with each sample (50 µl) was placed on agar plate which was inoculated with each test microorganism. ND; not determined
Most organic acids had no inhibitory activity against the strains. However, propionic acid showed reasonably strong activity against all strains (15−28 mm zone of inhibition). For neutral pH ranges, FSUR did not show antimicrobial activity, as shown in Table 6.
Table 6.The effect of pH on antimicrobial activity of FSUR.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of FSUR and determine its antioxidant activity, pH, sugar, total soluble solid, total acid, and free amino acid content. FSUR had a free amino acid content of 922.4 ± 115.8 mg/ml, organic acid content of 6.524 ± 0.075 mg/ml, and a sugar content of 2.877 ± 0.289 mg/ml. The observed total free amino acid content was higher than one that reported by Joo et al. [11]. Four strains were isolated from FSUR, an acetic acid bacterium (Acetobacter sp. FS-1), two lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus sp. FS-2 and Lactobacillus sp. FS-3), and Gluconacetobacter sp. FS-4. Acetic acid bacteria are important in the food and beverage industry owing to their ability to oxidize ethanol to acetic acid. These bacteria are the key microorganisms in vinegar production [17]. Lactic acid bacteria have beneficial effects as probiotics in the gut. L. casei and L. plantarum have health benefits against rotavirus diarrhea, reduce the recurrence of superficial bladder cancer, modulate immune responses, relieve irritable bowel syndrome, and reduce LDL-cholesterol [19].
As a result of DPPH assay, the radical scavenging activity of FSUR was 88.46 ± 1.30%. The observed antioxidant activity was comparable to that of ascorbic acid.
FSUR inhibited the growth of S. aureus, E. coli, L. monocytogenes, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, Y. enterocolitica, and L. elongisporus. The inhibitory activity was higher than those of the commercial antibiotics carbenicillin (50 μg/ml) and tetracycline (50 μg/ml). In particular, FSUR strongly inhibited the growth of Y. enterocolitica and Listeria monocytogenes. Y. enterocolitica is a zoonotic pathogen that is widely distributed in nature and can cause acute gastroenteritis and mesenteric lymphadenitis mimicking appendicitis [16]. Listeria monocytogenes is a major concern for food producers, health regulatory officials, and consumers because it is a highly virulent foodborne pathogen. The incidence of listeriosis is rare compared to illnesses caused by other foodborne pathogens, such as E. coli O157:H7, Campylobacter jejuni, or Salmonella spp. [1]. Propionic acid in the FSUR may have affected the antimicrobial activity.
In conclusion, FSUR has a high free amino acid content, high antioxidant activity, and higher antimicrobial activity than that of antibiotics against human pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, FSUR consumption may have various beneficial effects with respect to gut health.
References
- Al-Nabulsi AA, Osaili TM, Shaker RR, Olaimat AN, Jaradat ZW, Zain Elabedeen NA, et al. 2015. Effects of osmotic pressure, acid, or cold stresses on antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiol. 46: 154-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.07.015
- Banat IM, Samarah N, Murad M, Horne R, Banerjee S. 1991. Biosurfactant production and use in oil tank clean-up. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 7: 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310921
- Biswas B, Rogers K, McLaughlin F, Daniels D, Yadav A. 2013. Antimicrobial activities of leaf extracts of Guava (Psidium guajava L.) on two gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Int. J. Microbiol. 2013: 746165.
- Caceres PJ, Martinez-Villaluenga C, Amigo L, Frias J. 2014. Maximising the phytochemical content and antioxidant activity of Ecuadorian brown rice sprouts through optimal germination conditions. Food Chem. 152: 407-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.156
- Chen HH, Chen YK, Chang HC. 2012. Evaluation of physicochemical properties of plasma treated brown rice. Food. Chem. 135: 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.092
- Cho E-K, Jung K-I, Choi Y-J. 2012. Anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic effects of brown rice (Oryza sativa L.) extracts. J. Life Sci. 22: 126-131. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2012.22.1.126
- Choi H, Gwak G, Choi D, Park J, Cheong H. 2015. Antimicrobial efficacy of fermented dark vinegar from unpolished rice. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 6: 97-104.
- Goffman FD, Bergman CJ. 2004. Rice kernel phenolic content and its relationship with antiradical efficiency. J. Sci. Food Agric. 84: 1235-1240. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1780
- Irwansyah I, Li YQ, Shi W, Qi D, Leow WR, Tang MB, et al. 2015. Gram-positive antimicrobial activity of amino acid-based hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 27: 648-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201403339
- Jia S, Kang YP, Park JH, Lee J, Kwon SW. 2011. Simultaneous determination of 23 amino acids and 7 biogenic amines in fermented food samples by liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr A 1218: 9174-9182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.10.040
- Joo K-H, Cho M-H, Park K-J, Jeong S-W, Lim J-H 2009. Effects of fermentation method and brown rice content on quality characteristics of brown rice vinegar. Korean J. Food Preservat. 16: 33-39.
- Kim SP, Kang MY, Nam SH, Friedman M. 2012. Dietary rice bran component gamma-oryzanol inhibits tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice. Molecular. Nutr. Food. Res. 56: 935-944. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201200057
- Kitagaki H, Tsugawa M. 1999. 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) scavenging ability of sake during storage. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 87: 328-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(99)80040-1
- Koleva II, van Beek TA, Linssen JP, de Groot A, Evstatieva LN. 2002. Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochemical Analysis : PCA 13: 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.611
- Li C, Huang Q, Fu X, Yue XJ, Liu RH, You LJ. 2015. Characterization, antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities of polysaccharides from Prunella vulgaris Linn. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 75: 298-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.010
- Liang J, Wang X, Xiao Y, Cui Z, Xia S, Hao Q, et al. 2012. Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in pigs slaughtered in Chinese abattoirs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 2949-2956. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07893-11
- Mateo E, Torija MJ, Mas A, Bartowsky EJ. 2014. Acetic acid bacteria isolated from grapes of South Australian vineyards. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 178: 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.03.010
- Mehni AM, Ketabchi S, Shahidi Bonjar GH. 2014. Antibacterial activity and polyphenolic content of Citrullus colocynthesis. Int. J. Biosci. 4: 190-196.
- Ouwehand AC, Salminen S, Isolauri E. 2002. Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 82: 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020620607611
- Sharma MV, Sagar A, Joshi M. 2015. Study on antibacterial activity of Agaricus bisporus (Lang.) imbach. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 4: 553-558.
- Wang H, Gao XD, Zhou GC, Cai L, Yao WB. 2008. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of aqueous extract from Choerospondias axillaris fruit. Food Chem. 106: 888-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.068
- Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173: 697-703. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991
- Zhang G, Malik VS, Pan A, Kumar S, Holmes MD, Spiegelman D, et al. 2010. Substituting brown rice for white rice to lower diabetes risk: a focus-group study in Chinese adults. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 110: 1216-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2010.05.004