DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Resident-oriented Management Process & It's Participants Subjectivities in Maha Ecotourism, Pyeongchang-gun

평창 마하생태관광지의 주민 주도 운영 과정과 참여자의 태도에 관한 주관성 분석

  • Lee, Jae-Hyuck (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Yong-Hoon (Graduate School of Environment Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 이재혁 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 손용훈 (서울대학교 환경대학원)
  • Received : 2015.02.05
  • Accepted : 2015.03.12
  • Published : 2015.03.30

Abstract

In analyzing the issues of ecotourism, collecting opinions of local residents and participants is an essential process because ecotourism needs to keep ecological sensitivity and respect local residents' ecological lives. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze the local participants' attitude in resident-oriented ecotourism. Maha ecotourism site, as a study site, is located in Pyeongchang-gun, one of the twelve ecotourism sites designated by the Ministry of Environment. This site has drawn attention since the local government of Pyeongchang-gun transferred its management right on Maha ecotourism sit to the organization of local residents in 2013. This study uses Q methodology which is the most popular research method in analyzing people's subjectivity, that is, viewpoint and attitude. This study have found that there are four features in the subjectivities of participants toward ecotourism site: first group is the people who want more autonomous management right of local residents on Maha ecotourism site. Second group is the people who only want to stand by the ecotourism management. Third group is the people who focus on the migration of talented persons into their neighborhood owing to the program. Lastly, fourth group is the people who focus on the quality of the ecotourism program. In case of the second group, though they have negative opinions of the program, they have much interest in successful cases in other countries managed similar programs with Maha ecotourism. It would be effective for the group to have opportunities to experience successful ecotourism cases in other countries. On top of it, having seminars regarding ecotourism or holding community councils frequently would be very helpful for encouraging the second group of people to join in the ecotourism program actively like other groups of people. Supplying more manpower and developing various programs are also necessary in order to support other three groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, M. K. & Park, C. S., 2009, Development and Evaluation of Indicators for Low Carbon Ecotourism, Korean Environment Institue, Seoul(배민기.박창석, 2009, 저탄소 생태관광지표 개발 및 평가. 서울: 한국환경정책.평가연구원).
  2. Cho, J. H. & Kim, Y. G., 2014, A New Interpretation and Vision of Ecotourism, International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 28(1), 131-144.
  3. Choe, J. S., 2003, The Role of Local Governance on Ecotourism, Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 6(1), 233-247.
  4. Choi, H. K., 1998, A Study on the Activity of Development for Eco-Tourism Area, Journal of Tourism Systems and Quality Management, 4(1), 279-295.
  5. Choi, H. S. & Kim, H. A., 2012a, A Study on Domestic and Foreign Research Movement of the Eco-tourism Certification/Designation System and Its Application in Korea, Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 15(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2012.15.1.073
  6. Choi, H. S. & Kim, H. A., 2012b, Development of Assessment Indicators and System for Ecotourism Designation, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 21(1), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2012.21.1.185
  7. Cuppen, E., Breukers, S., Hisschemoller, M., & Bergsma, E., 2010, Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 69(3), 579-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.005
  8. Garcia-Melon, M., Gomez-Navarro, T., & Acuna-Dutra, S., 2012, A combined ANP-delphi approach to evaluate sustainable tourism. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 34, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.12.001
  9. Graci, S., 2013, Collaboration and partnership development for sustainable tourism, Tourism Geographies, 15(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2012.675513
  10. Gurung, D. B., & Scholz, R. W., 2008, Community-based ecotourism in Bhutan: Expert evaluation of stakeholder-based scenarios. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(5), 397-411. https://doi.org/10.3843/SusDev.15.5:1
  11. Hunt, C. A., 2009, "We are Even Poorer, but There is More Work" AN Ethnographic Analysis of Ecotourism in Nicaragua, Ph. D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University.
  12. Hunter, W. C., 2013, Performing Culture at the Formosan Aboriginal Culture Village in Taiwan: Exploring Performers' Subjectivities Using Q Method. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15(4), 403-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1887
  13. Hunter, W. C., 2014, Performing culture at indigenous culture parks in Taiwan: Using Q method to identify the performers' subjectivities, Tourism Management, 42(0), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.12.014
  14. Kang, M. H., 1999, Ecotourists' Travel Motivations and Attitudes in Korea : Scales Development and Comparative Analysis on Tourists Groups, Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  15. Kang, M. H., 2007, Ecotourism certification system, Korea Studies Information, Paju.
  16. Kang, M. H., 2010, 10 Eco-tourism Model Evaluating Progress Study for Korean Ecotourism Site Development, Korea Tourism Organization : Seoul(강미희, 2010, 한국형 생태관광지 조성을 위한 10대 모델사업 진행평가 연구, 한국관광공사 : 서울).
  17. Kim, H. G., 2008, Q methodology(Philosophy of Science, Theory, Analysis and Application), Communication Books : Seoul, Korea(김흥규, 2008, Q 방법론(과학철학, 이론, 분석 그리고 적용). 커뮤니케이션북스 : 서울).
  18. Kim, H., & Kaizu Yurie, 2002, A Study on Nature Resource Management System for Ecotourism Practices -The Case of the Iriomote Island in Japan-, J. Korean Env. Res. & Reverg. Tech., 5(6), 64-71.
  19. Kim, J. I., 1998, Critical Perspective about Ecotourism & It's Alternatives, Forest & Culture Series, 6(-), 87-107(김재일, 1998, 비판적 시각에서 본 생태 관광과 그 대안. 숲과 문화 총서, 6(-), 87-107).
  20. Kim, J. M. & K, E. J., 2002, A Study on the Development of Eco-tourism for Tidal Flat of Kanghwa, Journal of Tourism Management Research, 17(-), 5-25.
  21. Kim, S. E., 2007, Q Methods & sociology, Gold Well Publishing Inc. : Seoul, Korea.
  22. Kim, S. H., 2002, The Theoretical Characteristics and Research Trends of Ecotourism, The Journal of Applied Geography, -(23), 17-42.
  23. Kim, S. Y., 1992, Study of Ecotourism and It's Adjacent Similar Concept, International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, -(2), 203-221(김사영, 1992, 생태관광과 인접유사개념에 관한 연구. 관광연구저널, -(2), 203-221).
  24. Koh, E. K & Kim, T. H., 2003, Development of Ecotourism Program with Geomorphic Interpretations Using Oreum in Jeju Island of Korea, Journal of the Geomorphological Association of Korea, 10(2), 195-206.
  25. Lee, G. H., 1999, A Study on the Cooperation Plans of the Ecotourism Development in Community, Korea Industrial Economics Association, 12(6), 225-244.
  26. Lee, J. H., 2010, Study on the establishing indicator sets for evaluating eco-tourism sustainability and its application, Master Thesis, Seoul National University.
  27. Lee, J. H., Park, S. J., Jeon, S. H. & Son, Y. H., 2014, Conflict Structure Analysis on the Construction of stork Eco-Village in Yeasnagun Using Q methodology, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 20(4), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.4.077
  28. Lee, J. H. & Lee, H. Y., 2012, A study on the Development of the Indicator Sets for Evaluating the Sustainable Eco-tourism and Its' Application, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 47(6), 853-869.
  29. Park, C. M., 1998, Investigation on Resources for Ecotourism around Pyonsanbando National Park (1), Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture, 16(1), 1-14.
  30. Song, U. K., 2000, To Investigate the Introduction of Ecotourism, Journal of Kyonggi Tourism Research, 4(-), 197-208.
  31. Spenceley, A., 2008, Requirements for sustainable nature-based tourism in transfrontier conservation areas: a southern African Delphi consultation,. Tourism Geographies, 10(3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616680802236295
  32. Stergiou, D., & Airey, D., 2011, Q-methodology and tourism research, Current Issues in Tourism, 14(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2010.537316
  33. Tsaur, S. H., Lin, Y. C., & Lin, J. H., 2006, Evaluating ecotourism sustainability from the integrated perspective of resource, community and tourism, Tourism Management, 27(4), 640-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.02.006
  34. Wight, P., 2007, Chapter 11 - Ecotourism, CSR, and the fourth dimension of sustainability. In J. Higham (Ed.), Critical Issues in Ecotourism (pp. 214-239). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  35. Ya, E. S., 1993, Ecotourism Development Plans in Civilian Control Zone, International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, -(3), 171-195(야은숙, 1993, 민통선지역의 생태관광개발방안 연구. 관광연구저널, -(3), 171-195).
  36. Yang, S. P., 2012, A Study on the Relationships of Residents' Perceptions, Perceived Benefits, Development Supports and Intentions to Participate toward Eco-tourism Development]. Korean Journal of Tourism Research, 27(2), 319-339.
  37. Yoo, K. J., Lee, K. J. & Oh K. K., 1998, Ecotourism Planning Framework for Korean Rural Communities(1) -A Case Study in Jeongdori, Wandogun, Korea-, Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 12(1), 102-114.
  38. Yoo, K. J., Lee, K. J. & Oh K. K., 1999, Ecotourism Planning Framework for Korean Rural Communities(2) -A Case Study in Woopo Area, Changryounggun, Korea-]. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 12(2), 163-173.
  39. Yoon, S. Y. & Jung, I. C., 2000, Considerations for Ecotourism Planning of Junam Reservoir, Journal of Korean Wetlands Society, 2(1), 41-47.