초록
목적: 본 연구는 성인 남녀의 근거리 입체시와 근거리 사위의 관계를 알아보고, 근거리 입체시와 사위 및 굴절이상과의 상관성을 조사하였다. 방법: 성인 83명(남자 36명, 여자 47명, 평균 연령 $21.09{\pm}1.74$(19~29)세)을 대상으로 굴절이상자는 완전교정 후, 검사거리 40 cm에서 근거리 입체시는 Titmus-fly Stereotest(Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)와 RANDOT Stereotest(Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), 사위는 수정토링톤법(modified torrington method)으로 측정하였다. 결과: 근거리 입체시는 남자가 여자보다 더 좋았고 남녀 간에 차이는 없었으나, 근거리 사위는 여자가 남자보다 더 높았으며 남녀 간에 유의한 차이가 있었다(p<0.05). 근거리 입체시는 Titmus-fly Stereotest와 RANDOT Stereotest 결과 각각 내사위에서 $262.17{\pm}562.43$초, $243.08{\pm}68.04$초, 정위에서 $148.42{\pm}269.54$초, $107.40{\pm}263.74$초, 외사위에서 $113.94{\pm}152.46$초, $79.70{\pm}136.83$초로 사위 세 그룹 간에는 차이가 없었으나(p>0.05), 내사위와 근거리 입체시는 높은 상관성이 있었다(r=0.68). 또한 근거리 입체시가 굴절이상에서는 각각 정시에서 $80.00{\pm}571.43$초, $68.75{\pm}36.82$초, 근시에서 $133.57{\pm}224.15$초, $93.14{\pm}214.95$초 원시에서 $511.20{\pm}855.00$초, $511.4{\pm}855.60$초로 세 그룹 간에 유의한 차이를 나타냈다(p<0.05). 근거리 입체시를 굴절이상도로 분류했을 때, 정시에서 가장 좋고 고도 근시, 고도원시로 굴절이상도가 높았을 때 감소하였다. 결론: Titmus-fly Stereotest와 RANDOT Stereotest 결과, 성인의 근거리 입체시는 내사위일 때, 굴절이상이 높을 때 감소되어 사위 및 굴절이상과 관계가 있었고, 이 두 입체시 검사에서 근거리 입체시가 나쁠 경우에 사위 또는 굴절이상을 예상할 수 있다.
Purpose: This study was investigated the relationship between the male and female of near stereoacuity and phoria, and was examined the correlations between near stereoacuity and phoria and refractive error. Methods: Adult 83 (male 36, female 47, mean age $21.09{\pm}1.74$(19~29) years old) target was examined after full correction of refractive error. Near stereoacuity was measured by using Titmus-fly Stereotest(Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and RANDOT Stereotest (Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), phoria was measured by using modified torrington method, at distance 40 cm. Results: In near stereoacuity, male was better good than female, and there was no difference between male and female (p>0.05). In near phoria, female was more higher than male, and there was a significant difference between male and female (p<0.05). Near stereoacuity by Titmus-fly test and Randot test result respectively was $262.17{\pm}562.43$ sec (second of arc) $243.08{\pm}68.04$ sec in esophoria, $148.42{\pm}269.54$ sec, $107.40{\pm}263.74$ sec in orthophoria, $113.94{\pm}152.46$ sec, $79.70{\pm}136.83$ sec in exophoria, there was a no difference between three phoria groups (p>0.05), and was a high correlation between phoria and near stereoacity(r=0.68). In addition, near stereoacuity in the refractive error respectively was $80.00{\pm}571.43$ sec, $68.75{\pm}36.82$ sec in myopia, $133.57{\pm}224.15$ sec, $93.14{\pm}214.95$ sec in hyperopia, $511.20{\pm}855.00$ sec, $511.4{\pm}855.60$ sec, there was a significant difference between three phoria groups (p<0.05). when was classfiied near stersoacuity into degree of refractive error, near stersoacuity was best in emmetropia, and was reduced when refractive error was highest in high degree myopia, and hyperopia. Conclusions: Titmus-fly Stereotest and RANDOT Stereotest result, near stereoacuity of adults, when esophoria and high degree refractive error, was reduced, there was a relationship between near stereoacuity with phoria, and refractive error. In this both stereotests if was bad when near stereoacuity can expect a phoria and refractive error.
