• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.423-430
• /
• 2004

This Study on three different methods which are Von Graefe test, Maddox Rod test and Howell card test of measuring far and near lateral phoria investigated. It reviewed that 420 subjects aged from 15 to 35 years old. The result were as follows; 1. Using Von Graefe lateral phoria measurement, they were measured 6% for orthophoria, 62% for exophoria, 32% for esophoria at far distance. 2. Using Von Graefe lateral phoria measurement, they were measured 2% for orthophoria, 74% for exophoria, 24% for esophoria at near distance. 3. Using Maddox Rod lateral phoria measurement, they 59% for exophoria, 37% for esophoria at far distance. 4. Using Maddox Rod lateral phoria measurement, they 67% for exophoria, 30% for esophoria at near distance. 5. Using Howell card lateral phoria measurement, they 60% for exophoria, 32% for esophoria at far distance. 6. Using Howell card lateral phoria measurement, they 69% for exophoria, 27% for esophoria at near distance.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.59-63
• /
• 2009

Purpose: To investigate the near horizontal heterophoria of the college students in their twenties on north Kyonggi Province. Methods: The all subjects had not experienced any ocular surgery and have no disease and their mean age is 22.9. As 122 subjects, they are 50 emmetropes and 72 ametropes. The ametropes are all myopia. After distance visual acuity correction with subjective and objective refraction test, evaluated their horizontal heterophoria with red maddox rod. Results: In maddox rod test, the subjects consist of orthophoria 4.9%, esophoria 9.8% and exophoria 85.3%. In the emmetropes orthophoria is 8%, esophoria is also 8% and exophoria is 84%. In the ametropes orthophoria is 2.8%, esophoria is 11.1% and exophoria is 86.1%. The mean size of horizontal heterophoria is esophoria 3.59PD (prism diopter), exophoria 7.04PD and in the emmetropes esophoria is 3.25PD, exophoria is 6.60PD. In the ametropes esophoria is 3.75PD and exophoria is 7.34PD. Conclusions: In the emmetropoes the orthophoria is more than in the ametropes and the esophoria and exophoria is more in the ametropes. But the differences between the heterophoria and emmetropia or ametropia were not significant (p>0.05). The mean size of heterophoria is higher in the ametropes than in the emmetropoes. The distribution range of heterophoria is wider in the male subjects than the female subjects.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.14 no.4
• /
• pp.53-57
• /
• 2009

Purpose: To study the relationship of N.P.C, heterophoria and near convergence and divergence by amount of the refractive error. Methods: All subjects have no ocular disease and their mean age is 22.7. All 39 subjects examined about refractive error, near point of convergence (NPC), heterophoria, near convergence and divergence. Results: Classified by low refractive state, middle refractive state, and high refractive state compared with the expected value of Morgan. NPC had been measured within low and middle refractive state eight all the 8cm. However, high refractive state measured 9.64 cm. Low and middle refractive state for the classification by near phoria. Near esophoria groups was smallest by near divergence and exophoria groups was smallest by near convergence. Conclusions: Near convergence were largest with esophoria while near divergence were largest with exophoria.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.47-52
• /
• 2003

117 undergraduate ophthalmic optics students volunteered to participate in this study. They ranged in age from 19 to 26 years. Subject, had best corrected visual acuity of at least 1.0 in both eyes, no strabismus, no amblyopia, and no history of ocular surgery. 37 subjects are esphoria and 25 subjects are $3{\Delta}$ and less, and the rest of 12 subjects show more $4{\Delta}$. Average phoria amount is $2.96{\Delta}$ at far distance and $1.08{\Delta}$ at near distance, respectively. The variation of phoria amount in far and near distance, unchanging subjects are 3, 8 subjects are increase esophoria amount, and 26 subjects are phoria amount decreasing or appear exophoria. The reason of esophoria amount is decreasing in near distance, and the results are convergence burden decreases. At positive relative convergence, the expected value in far distance, blurred point is 7, break point is 16, and recovery point is 12. And negative relative convergence, break point is 7 and recovery point is 13, respectively. Moreover, at positive relative convergence, the expected value in near distance is blurred point is 8, break point is 7 and recovery point is 22. And negative relative convergence, blurred point is 2, break point is 8 and recovery point is 12, respectively.

• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.29-35
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study was to compare the compression force and thickness of the compressed breast between mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammography. This population consisted of 204 paired mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammography obtained on one mammographic unit by certified mammography technologists during 2 month period. The women examined were $30{\sim}59$ years old with breast implants, the patients were classified into 3 groups according to age, $30{\sim}39$, $40{\sim}49$, and $50{\sim}59$, prior breast cancer, mastectomy or breast deformity were excluded. The digital readout of compressed breast compression force and thickness was recorded. Mammographic positioning was assessed using standard criteria. The mean compression force of the compressed breast on the craniocaudal projection was less than the mean compression force on the mediolateral projection(14 versus 13.88 daN, p<0.05). The mean thickness of the compressed breast for mediolateral projection was 41.46 mm and that for the craniocaudal projection was 39.50 mm(p<0.05). The compressed breast is higher or thicker on mediolateral oblique than on craniocaudal mammography.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.91-94
• /
• 2007

This research was investigated to find out the examinees' refractive problems within heterophoria using Torrington method. The number of subjects ware approximately 327 and subjects were sourced from the 12th grade student at high school in Kwang-Ju city. Result obtained shows 21.4% of emmetropia and 78.6% of ametropia. Most of refractive errors were myopia and due to it's condition, frequency of ametropia and emmetropia at the similar rate. However, one that consist of refractive problems, it's myopia contains 74.9% of heterophoria. Due to emmetropia, horizontal heterophoria have 45.7% of exophoria and 4.3% of esophoria. Myopia shows 11.4% of esophoria and 63.5% of exophoria. Hozizonda heterophoria shows 5.7% of emmetropia and myopia of 22.4%, than average of esophoria shows $4.3P{\Delta}$ and case of myopia, it was $3.4P{\Delta}$. Case of Exphoria, emmetropia have $8.8P{\Delta}$ and within myopia $8.0P{\Delta}$. Vertical heterophoria owns $2.2P{\Delta}$ within emmetropia and case of myopia $4.3P{\Delta}$ was shown. Which shows myopia result value higher than emmetropia.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.59-63
• /
• 2001

Once refractive error of the eye was fully corrected. Polarization Test was used to investigate binocular vision function. As the results of phoria measurement of Korean adults for 53males and 59 females, orthophoria in 27.68%, esophoria in 12.50%, exophoria in 48.21%, verical phoria in 3.75%, esophoria(+verical phoria) in 2.68%, and exophoria(+vertical phoria) in 5.36%, respectively. Horizontal phoria is below $3{\Delta}$ mostly and verical phoria is below $1{\Delta}$.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.155-160
• /
• 2001

To investigate the subjective refractive error with Von Graefe test. Maddox Rod test and polarizing lens test of Horizontal Heterophoria Measurement at distance on normal 109 subjects aged from 18 to 30 years old. The results were as follows: 1. Using Von Graefe Horizontal Heterophoria Measurement, they were measured 15% for orthophoria, 65% for exophoria and 20% for esophoria at distance. 2. Using Maddox Rod Horizontal Heterophoria Measurement, they were measured 14% for orthophoria, 57% for exophoria and 29% for esophoria at distance. 3. Using polarizing lens test of Horizontal Heterophoria Measurement, they were measured 15% for orthophoria, 72% for exophoria and 13% for esophoria at distance. 4. Each test average were $1.32{\Delta}BI$ for Von Graefe test, $0.88{\Delta}BI$ for Maddox Rod test and $1.76{\Delta}BI$ for polarizing lens test. 5. Patient's preference distribution were 44% for Von Graefe test, 28% for Maddox Rod test and 28% for polarizing lens test.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.139-146
• /
• 2000

Once refractive error of the eye was fully corrected, Maddox rod was used to investigate binocular vision function. When the deviations of subjects' eyes were measured, orthophoria. without any horizontal deviations, was found in 10%, esophoria in 55% and exophoria in 34% of the patients. Esodeviation of the eye was found to be greater than exo-deviation by 11%. This is also refracted in deviations found to be greater than $4{\Delta}$ diopter magnitude where esophoria was 23% and exophoria was 9%. Thus for the patients to achieve comfortable binocular vision function, binocular vision anomalies need to be considered in spectacle prescription. In examining ocular anomalies of corrected refractive error, the deviation of the eye differed from under corrected refractive power to over corrected refractive power. There was a decrease in exophoria and an increase in esophoria, with over correction. This was thought to be due to accommodation. Furthermore, calculated AC/A ratio was found to vary from 1.25 to 6.61 and its relationship to refractive error could not be determined.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.151-157
• /
• 2006

We researched distant & near horizontal heterophoria of myope using von graefe method on full correction condition for young people 49 subjects(98eyes) with myopia after testing the objective refraction. Among the whole subjects, we got the results as Orthophoria 51.00%, Exophoria 38.75%, Esophoria 10.25% and Heterophoria 49.00% at a long distant. At a short distant, they showed Orthophoria 22.45%, Exophoria 67.35, Esophoria 10.20%, and Heterophoria 77.55%, Orthophoria 22.45. At a long distant they showed Orthophoria 4.08%, Exophoria 8.16%, Esophoria 0% on high myopia, Orthophoria 18.37%, Exophoria 12.25%, Esophoria 0% on middle myopia and Orthophoria 28.57%, Exophoria 18.37%, Esophoria 10.20% on low myopia.