The Communication Aspect of Film and Engineering

영화와 공학의 소통 방식

  • Ham, Jong-ho (School of General Education, The University Of Seoul)
  • 함종호 (서울시립대학교 교양교육부)
  • Received : 2015.10.12
  • Accepted : 2015.11.11
  • Published : 2015.11.30

Abstract

This is paper aims to figure out the way movies and engineering have communicated and the right direction for better communication between them. Engineering no longer should be treated as playing a key role when it comes to film making. Engineering is essential in making films look real. It means that movies gain credibility from utilizing engineering, which all other types of arts also seek after. Films can be resonated better through mutual communication with engineering. The paper takes a close look at emotional aspects to figure out what the new direction of communication between movies and engineering is. People's lives shown in films and the material world that engineering represents are mingled to attain the emotional oneness between the two. This can be easily observed in Japanese movies where robots and humans have a close relationship or recent films whose theme is emotional exchange among humans and robots. This kind of contact leads us to explore newly found humans' position that was brought about in the wake of development in engineering and existential conditions that humans need to have accordingly. Artificial intelligence and neurology sectors that the engineering field is today earnestly working on are in line with it. Therefore, this article seeks to find out the meaning and value of communication between movies and engineering when establishing the fresh mankind model based on emotions and pursuit of diversity.

Keywords

References

  1. 강순규(2011). 비인간적인 인간과 인간적인 복제인간. 영화, 4(2): 133-153.
  2. 굴드, S. J.(2002). 풀하우스, 이명희 (역.), 사이언스북스.
  3. 권택영 (편.)(1994), 욕망이론, 민승기.이미선.이미선 (역.), 문예출판사.
  4. 김석(2006), 욕망하는 주체와 욕망하는 기계. 철학과 현상학 연구, 29: 173-202.
  5. 들뢰즈, G.(2008). 감각의 논리, 하태완 (역.), 민음사.
  6. 박성수(2005). 디지털 영화의 미학, 문화과학사.
  7. 박이문(1983). 예술철학, 문학과지성사.
  8. 서동욱(2002). 들뢰즈의 철학, 민음사.
  9. 엄창섭(2013). 기계와 인간의 융합 : 미래사회 핵심 키워드는 '의식'. 브레인, 39: 34-35.
  10. 에반스, D.(1998). 라깡 정신분석 사전, 김종주 외 (역.), 인간사랑.
  11. 양석원(2003). 응시의 저편 : 자끄 라캉 이론에서의 주체와 욕망. 안과 밖, 15: 55-76.
  12. 윤대선(2011). 디지털 시대의 문화적 감성과 소통의 연구. 해석학 연구, 21: 3-36.
  13. 이수진(2012). 영화의 접속 기표와 포스트-휴머니즘의 재현. 기호학 연구, 32: 197-219.
  14. 이진경(2002). 노마디즘1, 휴머니스트.
  15. 정지연(2009). 디지털 시대의 영화 존재론에 관한 연구. 커뮤니케이션학 연구, 17(1): 75-106.