DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Success Factors of UCSD CONNECT as Business Incubator

UCSD CONNECT의 기업보육 성공요인

  • Chun, Se-Hak (Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Dept. of Management) ;
  • Byun, Yong-Hwan (Hallym University, Dept. of Management)
  • 천세학 (서울과학기술대학 경영학과) ;
  • 변용환 (한림대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2014.10.09
  • Accepted : 2015.01.20
  • Published : 2015.01.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is, through journal review, to introduce and analyze the success factor and programs of CONNECT which have made key contributions in the construction of San diego Bio-cluster and thereby show directions business incubators in Korea should try to follow. CONNECT is a most popular bench-marking case over the world for bio-venture incubation. In this paper, core success factors and incubating programs of CONNECT are analyzed in detailed way for local govenments and incubating institutions to develop enterprise promotion policy. CONNECT is famous for its tailored services to meet the varying needs of entrepreneurs at all stages of their business life cycles and growth. CONNECT is a pioneer which provide mainly software services by using network while it provide hardware supports like space at minimun level. CONNECT has provided early stage corporations with diverse software services on which business incubators in Korea should have focus Since its inception, CONNECT has assisted more than 800 technology companies. Leadership of policy makers, network and software services have been key success factors of UCSD CONNECT.

본 연구의 목적은 샌디에고 바이오 클러스트를 형성하는데 핵심적 역할을 한 CONNECT의 성공요인과 프로그램들을 문헌연구를 통해 분석하고 소개함으로서 우리나라 창업보육센터의 서비스를 향상시키기 위한 방향성을 제시하는데 있다. 현재 CONNECT는 창업보육에 있어 세계적인 벤치마킹사례로 유명하다. 본 논문에서는 국내의 지방자치단체 및 창업보육기관들이 쉽게 벤치마킹할 수 있도록 CONNECT의 성공요인을 분석하고 핵심보육프로그램들을 소개하는데 중점을 두었다. UCSD CONNECT는 기업성장단계별로 다양한 기업의 필요에 따른 지원프로그램을 잘 갖추고 있으며 현재까지 800개가 넘는 하이테크기업들을 육성했다. CONNECT는 하드웨어적 지원방식에 익숙한 우리나라의 창업보육센터가 향후 중점을 두어야 할 다양한 소프트웨어적 지원 프로그램들을 제공해 왔다. 정책책임자의 리더쉽, 네트워크 및 소프트웨어적 기업지원서비스가 UCSD CONNECT의 가장 중요한 성공요인이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Mian, S. A. Assessing and Managing the University Technology Business Incubator; An Integrative Framework, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12, pp. 251-285, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00063-8
  2. Dae-Ho, Kim, A Study on the Development of Business Incubator, Journal of Korea Business Administration, No. 3, pp.1151-1176, 2004
  3. Dong-Yup, Lee & Jin-Wook, Kim, Development of Evaluation Model in Business Incubator Using Data Mining Process, IE Interfaces, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 387-394, 2007
  4. Byung-Soo, Kang, Performance and Development Strategies of Business Incubators in Daejeon, Journal of Korea Region Developement, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 93-120, 2007
  5. Chang-Kyu Ou & Hyal-Sick Jang, A Study on the Impact of Incubating Services Between BI Centers and the Firms in the BI, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16. No. 4, pp. 269-286
  6. You-Sang Ko, Development Strategy of Bio-Cluster in Korea, SERI, 2002
  7. Palmintera, D. et al., Developing High-Technology Communities : San Diego, Innovation Associates Inc., 2000
  8. Ki-Chul Yim Dong-Bae Park, Base Formation and Vitalization Plan of Regional Innovation Structure, Science & Technology Policy Institute, 2004
  9. Myung-Ku Kang & Sang-Tae Kim, Role of Urban Planning in High-tech Cluster Development : Case of San Diego Bio-Cluster, Journal of Urban Management, Vol.25, No.1, pp. 347-367, 2012.
  10. Byung-Chun Park, Business innovation support policy for promoting small and medium enterprises into globally specialized enterprises - Focusing on R&D support policies and programs -, Journal of Korean Association of Regional Studies, Vol. 21, No.2, pp.1-27, 2013
  11. Frenkel, A., & Shefer, D., Modeling Regional Innovativeness and Innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 30, pp.31-54, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580536
  12. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Elxebamia, G., Regional Systems of Innovation: An Evolutionary Perspective. Environment Planning, Vol. 30, pp. 1563-1584, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1068/a301563
  13. Gordon. I. R., & McCam, P., "Industry Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Network? Urban Studies, Vol. 37. No. 3, pp. 513-531, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098002096
  14. Munroe, T., Gary W. Craft, and David Hutton(2002), A Critical Analysis of the Local Biotechnology Industry Cluster in Alameda, Contra Costa, & Solano Counties, Volume 1, 2
  15. Barrell, Alan, Experience of Emerging Biotech Cluster Developments, 2002
  16. Gonzalez, Cristina, E,ntrepreneurial President: Richard Atkinson and the University of California, 1995-2003 by Patricia A. Pelfrey (review), The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 416-417, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2013.0033
  17. Porter, Michael, Clusters and Competitiveness: Findings from the Cluster Mapping Project, 2001
  18. Gemunden, H. G., Network Configuration and Innovation Success: An Empirical Analysis in German, High-Tech Industries, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 13, pp. 449-462, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(96)00026-2
  19. Young-Duck Lee & Jung-Sick Kim, Exploratory Study for Key Driver of Bio-Cluster Development, The Journal of Management & Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.189-208, 2003
  20. Jun-Yup Kim, Strategies for High-growth Enterprises: Implications for Policy Initiatives in East Midland, UK, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.557-585, 2012
  21. http://www.connect.org, 2014.5.1
  22. You-Shin Jung, Cooperation Method between Veture Capital Market and Capital Market for Incubation of Small and Midium Venture Enterprise, Bulls review, No. 14, pp.8-23, 2012
  23. Kim, S.T.& An, J. D. 2012, "A Comparison of Daedeok Innopolis Cluster with the San Diego Biotechnology Cluster", WTR 12-1, 118-1282;12012;1:118-12
  24. Tae-Hyung Kwon & Jong-Woo Park, A Preliminary Study of Strategic Action Models for Firm Supports by Local Governments: The Experiences of Support Project for Daegu Star Firms, Korean Governmental Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 343-373, 2011