The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A prospective study of patient satisfaction after implant supported mandibular overdenture treatment in fully edentulous patients

완전 무치악 환자에서 하악 임플란트 지지 피개의치 사용 후의 환자만족도에 관한 전향적 연구

  • Hong, Ju-Hee (Department of Clinical Oral Health Science, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Jung, Gyu-Un (Department of Periodontology, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Pang, Eun-Kyoung (Department of Clinical Oral Health Science, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University)
  • 홍주희 (이화여자대학교 임상치의학대학원 임상구강보건학과) ;
  • 정겨운 (이화여자대학교 의학전문대학원 부속 목동병원 치주과) ;
  • 신상완 (고려대학교임상치의학대학원, 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 방은경 (이화여자대학교 임상치의학대학원 임상구강보건학과)
  • Received : 2014.08.27
  • Accepted : 2014.10.01
  • Published : 2015.01.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the satisfaction levels of the patients worn implant supported mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures. Materials and methods: Full edentulous patients (n=40) who were planned to do implant supported mandibular overdentures, aged 51 to 82 years, were enrolled in this study. All subjects rated their satisfaction levels (mastication, pronunciation, esthetics, pain, and general satisfaction) of their original conventional dentures prior to treatment and their new overdentures 1 week and 12 weeks after the delivery on 10 cm visual analogue scales. Repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to compare the satisfaction level of each three period (P<.05). Results: The mean satisfaction levels of the implant supported overdentures after 1 week and 12 weeks of delivery were significantly higher than those of the conventional complete dentures in all scoring parameters (P<.05). After 12 weeks of overdenture delivery, the increase of the satisfaction levels in mastication, pronunciation, and pain and the decrease in esthetics and general satisfaction were observed in comparison with those after 1 week of delivery, however, no significant difference was found between the satisfaction levels of 1 week and 12 weeks after delivery. Conclusion: An implant supported overdenture might be one of the effective ways to give more satisfaction to patients who were not gratified with a conventional denture and eventually to improve their quality of life.

목적: 이 연구의 목적은 하악 임플란트 지지 피개의치와 전통적인 총의치의 환자 만족도를 비교하기 위함이다. 재료 및 방법: 하악 임플란트 지지 피개의치 치료가 계획된 40명의 상하악 완전 무치악 환자(51세 - 82세)를 대상으로 하였고, 모든 환자는 저작기능, 발음, 심미, 통증, 전반적인 만족도를 기존의 총의치 장착 시와 임플란트 지지 피개의치 장착 1주 후, 12주 후에 visual analog scale법을 이용하여 답하였다. 각 시기의 만족도 비교를 위해 반복측정 분산분석(repeated-measures ANOVA)을 시행하였다(P<.05). 결과: 모든 설문 항목에서 임플란트 지지 피개의치 장착 1주 후, 12주 후에 총의치를 장착했을 때보다 높은 만족도를 보였다(P<.05). 임플란트 지지 피개의치 장착 12주 후에 저작기능, 발음, 통증, 전반적인 만족도는 장착 1주 후에 비해 증가된 결과를 보였고, 심미에 대한 만족도와 전체적인 만족도는 감소함을 나타냈으나, 통계적인 유의성을 보이지는 않았다. 결론: 임플란트 지지 피개의치는 기존의 총의치에 만족하지 못하는 환자들의 만족도를 높임으로써 환자의 삶의 질을 개선시킬 수 있는 효과적인 치료 방법 중 하나가 될 수 있으리라 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Boering G. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:1167-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4
  2. Haraldson T, Karlsson U, Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil 1979;6:41-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1979.tb00403.x
  3. Kapur KK, Garrett NR, Hamada MO, Roumanas ED, Freymiller E, Han T, Diener RM, Levin S, Wong WK. Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part III: comparisons of patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:416-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70028-4
  4. Redford M, Drury TF, Kingman A, Brown LJ. Denture use and the technical quality of dental prostheses among persons 18-74 years of age: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75:714-725. https://doi.org/10.1177/002203459607502S11
  5. Atwood DA. Bone loss of edentulous alveolar ridges. J Periodontol 1979;50:11-21. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1979.50.4s.11
  6. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  7. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse- Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:601-2.
  8. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Müller F, Naert I, Ellis JS, Barclay C, Butterworth C, Scott B, Lynch C, Stewardson D, Smith P, Welfare R, Hyde P, McAndrew R, Fenlon M, Barclay S, Barker D. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients-the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009;207:185-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728
  9. Thomason JM. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002;10:95-96.
  10. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R. Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:628-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028007628.x
  11. Haraldson T, Jemt T, Stålblad PA, Lekholm U. Oral function in subjects with overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:235-42.
  12. Assuncao WG, Barao VA, Delben JA, Gomes EA, Tabata LF. A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: a literature review. Gerodontology 2010;27:154-62.
  13. Berg E. Acceptance of full dentures. Int Dent J 1993;43:299-306.
  14. Kalk W, de Baat C. Patients' complaints and satisfaction 5 years after complete denture treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990;18:27-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1990.tb00657.x
  15. van Waas MA. The influence of psychologic factors on patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:545-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90073-L
  16. Fenlon MR, Sherriff M. An investigation of factors influencing patients' satisfaction with new complete dentures using structural equation modelling. J Dent 2008;36:427-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.016
  17. Sato Y, Hamada S, Akagawa Y, Tsuga K. A method for quantifying overall satisfaction of complete denture patients. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:952-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00579.x
  18. Tang L, Lund JP, Tache R, Clokie CM, Feine JS. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: psychometric evaluation and patient preference. J Dent Res 1997;76:1675-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760100901
  19. Berg E. The influence of some anamnestic, demographic, and clinical variables on patient acceptance of new complete dentures. Acta Odontol Scand 1984;42:119-27. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358409035249
  20. Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:467-73.
  21. van der Bilt A, Burgers M, van Kampen FM, Cune MS. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures and oral function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1209-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01915.x
  22. Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, Van Der Bilt A, Van 'T Hof MA, Witter DJ, Kalk W, Jansen JA. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res 2000;79:1519-1524. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790071501
  23. von Wowern N, Gotfredsen K. Implant-supported overdentures, a prevention of bone loss in edentulous mandibles? A 5- year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:19-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001019.x
  24. Al-Zubeidi MI, Alsabeeha NH, Thomson WM, Payne AG. Patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different attachment systems: 5-year outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:696-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00306.x
  25. Harris D, Hofer S, O'Boyle CA, Sheridan S, Marley J, Benington IC, Clifford T, Houston F, O'Connell B. A comparison of implantretained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life in edentulous patients: a randomized, prospective, within-subject controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:96-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02368.x
  26. Preciado A, Del Rlo J, Suarez-Garcla MJ, Montero J, Lynch CD, Castillo-Oyague R. Differences in impact of patient and prosthetic characteristics on oral health-related quality of life among implantretained overdenture wearers. J Dent 2012;40:857-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.006
  27. Grogono AL, Lancaster DM, Finger IM. Dental implants: a survey of patients' attitudes. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:573-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90082-6
  28. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:117-22.
  29. Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, Savard A, Feine JS. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:390-6.
  30. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:799-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01442.x

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Two Different Attachments with Implant Retained Mandibular Overdentures on the Masticatory Function vol.4, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2016.04.00101