DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Impact Factor in Suspension Bridges under A Series of Moving Vehicles

일련의 주행 차량에 의한 현수교의 충격계수 평가

  • Received : 2014.08.02
  • Accepted : 2014.10.20
  • Published : 2014.10.27

Abstract

In this paper, vehicle-bridge interaction analysis under a series of moving vehicles to simulate a lane load was performed to estimate impact factor of the main cable, hanger and girder for the selected suspension bridges with 404m and 1545m main span. Korea Bridge Design Code(Limit State Design) was selected for the live model in which KL-510 truck was modeled 6-d.o.f. vehicle and a lane load was simulated by a series of single-axle vehicles. For the 404m main span bridge, hinge-type and floating-type girders at the tower were considered to examine the impact factor according to the connection and supporting type of the girders. The parameters considered herein are the types of live load-a truck only and a truck plus lane load, eccentricity of moving vehicles, road surface roughness and vehicle speed. The road surface roughness was randomly generated based on ISO 8608 and it was applied to the truck only. The impact factors were also evaluated by using the influence line method that is commonly used in cable-supported bridges and compared with those from vehicle-bridge interaction analysis.

본 연구에서는 중앙경간 404m 및 1545m의 현수교에 일련의 차량이 차로하중 형태로 주행하는 상태에 대해 차량-교량 상호작용 해석을 수행하고 주케이블, 행어 및 보강거더의 충격계수를 평가하였다. 활하중 모델은 도로교한계상태설계기준을 참고하였으며, KL-510 트럭은 6-자유도 모델로, 차로하중은 일련의 1축 차량이 연행해서 주행하는 것으로 모사하였다. 주탑부에서 보강거더의 연결 및 지지 형식에 따른 충격계수의 차이를 평가하기 위해 중앙경간 404m 교량에 대해서는 hinge-type과 floating-type 거더 형식을 고려하였다. 해석에서 고려한 매개변수는 활하중 형식-트럭 단독 주행시와 트럭과 차로하중의 주행, 차량의 편심 주행, 노면조도 그리고 주행속도를 고려하였다. 노면조도는 ISO 8608 규정에 근거하여 랜덤 생성하였으며 차량-교량 상호작용해석 시 노면조도는 트럭하중에만 적용하였다. 한편, 케이블 교량의 충격계수 평가를 위해 일반적으로 사용되는 영향선 기법에 의해 충격계수를 산출하고 차량-교량 상호작용해석에 의한 결과와 비교하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이승우(2003) 현수교의 계획과 해석, 도서출판 한기술. Lee, S.W. (2003) Planning and Analysis of Suspension Bridge, HanGiSul.
  2. 대한토목학회(2010) 도로교설계기준, 국토해양부. Korea Road and Transportation Association (2012) Korea Highway Bridge Design code, sponsored by Ministry of land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  3. 대한토목학회(2005) 케이블 강교량 설계 지침 작성 연구. Korean Society of Civil Engineers (2005) Guidelines for Steel Cable-supported Bridges.
  4. Karoumi, R. (1999) Response of Cable-Stayed and Suspension Bridges to Moving Vehicles-Analysis methods and practical modeling techniques, Royal Institute of Technology Department of Structural Engineering, Doctoral Thesis.
  5. Hayashikawa, T. and Watanabe, N. (1982) Dynamic Behavior of Suspension Bridges under Moving Loads, Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Vol.16, No.1, pp.1-12 (in Japanese).
  6. 장승필, 김호경, 서정인(1995) 불규칙한 노면조도 위를 주행하는 차량에 의한 자정식 현수교의 진동특성, 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회, 제7권, 제1호, pp.117-123. Chang, S.P., Kim, H.K., and Suh, J.I. (1995) Selfanchored Suspension Bridge Vibration due to a Vehicle Load Running on Irregular Road Surface, Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, KSSC, Vol.7, No.1, pp.117-123 (in Korean).
  7. 서정인, 김호경(2000) 현수교의 정착 형식에 따른 이동 하중에 의한 동적 응답의 비교, 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회, 제12권, 제1호, pp.103-110. Suh, J.I. and Kim, H.K. (2000) Comparison of Dynamic Response According to Anchorage Type of Suspension Bridges, Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, KSSC, Vol.12, No.1, pp.103-110 (in Korean).
  8. 한국도로교통협회(2012) 도로교설계기준(한계상태설계법), 국토해양부. Korea Road and Transportation Association (2012) Korea Highway Bridge Design code (Limit State Design), sponsored by Ministry of land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  9. ISO 8608 (1995) Mechanical vibration-Road surface profiles-Reporting of measured data.
  10. Wang, T.L. and Huang, D.Z. (1992) Cable-Stayed Bridge Vibration due to Road Surface Roughness, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.118, No.5, pp.1354-1374. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1354)
  11. Dodds, C.J. and Robson, J.D. (1973) The Description of Road Surface Roughness, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol.38, No.2, pp.175-183.
  12. Komatsu, S. and Kawatani, M. (1978) Study on Dynamic Response and Impact of Cable-Stayed Girder Bridges under Moving Vehicles, Journal of Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.275, pp.13-28 (in Japanese).
  13. 박재봉, 박용명, 김동현, 이종한(2013) 신뢰도 기반 활하중모델에 의한 강합성 사장교의 충격계수 평가, 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회, 제25권, 제4호, pp.335-346. Park, J.B., Park, Y.M., Kim, D.H., and Lee, J.H. (2013) Evaluation of Impact Factor in Composite Cable-stayed Bridges under Reliability-based Live Load Model, Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, KSSC, Vol.24, No.4, pp.335-346 (in Korean).
  14. Calcada, R., Cunha, A., and Delgado, R. (2005) Analysis of Traffic-Induced Vibrations in a Cable-Stayed Bridge, Part II: Numerical Modeling and Stochastic Simulation, Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol.10, No.4, pp.386-397. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:4(386)
  15. Hikosaka, H., Yoshimura, T., and Uchitani, T. (1979) Non-Stationary Random Response And Impact Coefficient of Simple Girder Highway Bridge Under A Series of Moving Vehicle Loads, Journal of Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.290, pp.31-41 (in Japanese).
  16. Chopra, A.K. (1995) Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 2nd. Ed., Prentice Hall.
  17. Yang, F. and Fonder, G.A. (1996) An Iterative Solution Method for Dynamic Response of Bridge-Vehicles Systems, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 25, pp.195-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199602)25:2<195::AID-EQE547>3.0.CO;2-R
  18. Fukuda, S., Kajikawa, Y., and Tsunomoto, M. (1998) Vibration Characteristics and Dynamic Increment Factor of 2 Span Continuous Cable-stayed Bridge Under Moving Vehicles, Journal of Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, No.605/I-45, pp.37-47 (in Japanese).