참고문헌
- Alexopoulou, E., & Drive, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in peers and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1099::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
- Ballantyne, R., Hughies, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009302
- Back, S. K. (2000). The principle of descriptive evaluation. Seoul: Education Science Company.
- Blom, D., & Poole, K. (2004). Peer assessment of tertiary music performance. British Journal of Music Education, 21(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051703005539
- Chea, S. J. (2006). A study on concordance of student assessment in problem based learning of medical schools. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 14(1), 331-349.
- Cho, H. M. (2004). A theoretical exploration of peer evaluation in the perspective of social constructivism. The Journal of Education, 23, 229-254.
- Defina, A. A. (1992). PortFolio assessment. Getting started. New York, NY: Scholastic Professional Books.
- Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293860110206
- Farr, R., & Tone, B. (1994). Portfolio and performance assessment. NY: Arlex publishing.
- Fry, S. (1990). Implementation and evaluation of peer marking in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15, 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293900150301
- Green, M. (1994). Children as evaluation understanding from the inside. In B. Cambourne & J. Turbil (Eds.), Responsive evaluation (pp. 83-103). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Ha, B., Lee, Y., Ha, O., & Sin, M. (2000). Development of practical instrument for the measurement of science process skills of elementary school students. Journal of Research in Science & Mathematic education, 26, 33-72.
- Hahn, A. J., Kang, H., Kwan, C., Kim, H., & Woo, J. (1997). New elementary science teaching method. Seoul: Education science company.
- Hahn, J. S., & Oh, J. S. (2008). Effects of peer rating on the web-based online discussion. Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.24.1.87
- Hong, M., & Chung, H. (2006). The development of assessment items with assay & description type test science in biology for high school students. Journal of Science Education Kyungpook National University, 30, 65-100.
-
http://vassarstats.net/utest.html The logic and computational details of the Mann-Whitney test. chapter 11a. Concepts and Applications of Inferential Statistics. provided by the Department of Mathematics & Statistics at the University of Saskatchewan:
${\copyright}$ Richard Lowry 2001-2014. - Hwang, J., Lee, H., & Kwack, D. (2010). An assessement of high school students' performance on science process skills in biology, Research for Subject Matter Education, 14(1), 67-84.
- Kang, K. H. (2009). The analysis of results and recognition on pre-service science teachers' peer evaluation in presentation activity. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 25(3), 261-275.
- Kang, H., Gong, Y., Kwon, H., Kim, J., Bae, J., Song, M., Sin, Y., Yang, I., Yun, H., Lee, D., Lee, M., Im, C., Im, H., Jang, S., Jun, Y., & Chae, D. (2010). Elemenatary science education theory. Seoul: Education Science Company.
- Kim, M. J. (2005). Peer assessment as a learning method: The effects of assessor and assessee's roles on metacognition, performance, and motivation. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(4), 1-28.
- Kim, H. N., Jung, W. H., & Jung, J. W. (1998). National science evaluation system development of affective characteristics. Chungbuk: Science Education Institute of Korea National University of Education.
- Kim, J. H. (2010). Descriptive evaluation ROAD VIEW, Seoul: ParkLeeJung Publisher.
- Kim, K., Seo, Y., & Lee, Y. (2013). An Application Method Study on Written Performance Assessments in Middle School Informatics according to the Revised Curriculum in 2009. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 29(4), 187-203.
- Kim, S., & Yoo, Y. (2006). Developing descriptive essay problems in mathematics for high school students. Journal of Science Education Kyungpook National University, 30, 1-22.
- Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2012). The Development of a free-response test for the assessment of science process skill. Biology education, 40(1), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.1.167
- Kyungkido Education Office. (2012). Guidebook of descriptive & Essay evaluation. North government office building, Support section of teaching and learning.
- Lee, J., You, Y., Sin, E., Jung, J., Im, K., Gu, E., Kim, H., Ham, D., Kwak, J., Park, S., Park, S., Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2011). Descriptive evaluation ROAD VIEW-Science, Seoul: ParkLeeJung Publisher.
- Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assesment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293960210304
- Park, D. S. (2008). Evaluation of education. Seoul: Education Science Company.
- Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. (2010). Reinforcing method of descriptive and assay assessment for students' improvement of scholastic ability in Seoul. Report paper 2007.
- Song, H. M. (2006). The analysis of the effect of peer evaluation and the verbal interaction in small groups in solving descriptive questions of metabolism (Doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk.
- Topping, K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (1998). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
- Yang, G. S. (2006). Descriptive and essay assessment source book. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education.
- Watson, S. B., & Marshall, J. E. (1995). Effects of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interaction of cooperative learning groups in a college life science course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320308
- Webb, N. M. (1982). Group Composition, Group Interaction, and Achievement in small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.475
- Wen, M. L., & Tsai, A. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward online peer assessment. Higher Education, 51, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
피인용 문헌
- 초등학교 과학과 5, 6학년 서술형 평가문항의 행동영역 내용타당도 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 vol.36, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0087
- A Survey on the Conditions of Middle School Science Evaluation vol.55, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.55.3.201609.389
- The Effect of Team Project on Divergent Thinking and Analytical Skills in Pre-Service Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) vol.21, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2017.21.1.15
- 중학교 과학에서 서술형 평가의 실태 분석: 문항유형, 단원, 평가목표를 중심으로 vol.42, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2018.42.2.198
- 선다형 문제와 서술형 문제의 점수 차이와 이에 대한 학생들의 인식 -고등학교 기하 교과를 중심으로- vol.57, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2018.57.3.197
- 자유학기제 과학과 평가에 대한 교사의 인식과 실제 vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.1.143
- 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 제시된 중학교 1학년 성취기준과 과학 1 교과서에 포함된 활동과 평가 문항 분석: 과학과 핵심역량 중심으로 vol.63, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2019.63.3.196