참고문헌
- Bybee, R. W. (2011). Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms: Understanding a framework for K-12 science education. Science and Children, 49(4), 10-16.
- Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1997). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what the know. Boston, MA: Harvard business school press.
- Duschl, R. A., Ellenbogen, K., & Erduran, S. (1999). Promoting argumentation in middle school science students: A Project SEPIA evaluation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Boston.
- Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2002). Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of Physics. Science Education, 85(6), 106-121.
- Giere, R., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning. London: Thomson Learning.
- Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Explanations with models in science education. Developing Models in Science Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
- Haack, S. (2003). Defending science-within reason: Between scientism and cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
- Hand, B., Choi, A., Greenbowe, T., Schroeder, J., & Bennett, W. (2008). Examining the impact of student use of multiple-mode representations in constructing science arguments. annual international conference of national association for research in science teaching. Baltimore, MD.
- Hand, B., Wallace, C., & Yang, E. (2004). Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070252
- Halloun, I. A. (1996). Schematic Modeling for meaningful learning of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 1-26.
- Kang, I. A. (1997). A brief reflection on cognitive and social constructivism. Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2). 3-20.
- Kelly, G. J., & Takao A. (2001). Epistemic levels in argument: an analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314-342.
- Kelly, G. J., Bazerman, C., Skukauakaite, A., & Prothero, W. (2002). Rhetorical features of student science writing in introductory university oceanography (pp. 265-282). Routledge, NY: New York Publisher.
- Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674-689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.674
- Laubichler, M. & Muuller, G. (2007). Modeling biology: structures, behaviors, evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-880). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publisher.
- Lee, J. S. (2002). Principles and methods of teaching writing; Process-oriented approach. Seoul: Teaching the history of science Publishers.
- Lee, K. N. (2007). Effects of constructivistic learning strategy on middle school students' learning of scientific conception learning and scientific attitudes: Focused on science writing (Doctoral dissertation). Chonbuk National University, Korea.
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy: Supporting development in learning in contexts. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, K. A. Renninger, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, (6th ed., Vol. 4). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
- Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on of science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
- Magnani, L., & Nersessian, N. (2002). Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Ministry Of Education. (2012). 2009 Revised national curriculum. MOE, Notice No. 2011-2361.
- Morgan, M., & Morrison, M. (1999). Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nam, J. H., Kwak, K. H., Jang, K. H., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Owens, C. V. (2000). Teachers' responses to science writing. Teaching and learning-grand forks-, 15(1), 22-35.
- Pineda, L., & Garza, G. (2000). A model for multimodal reference resolution. Computational Linguistics, 26(2), 139-193. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120100561665
- Romberg, T., Carpenter, T., & Kwako, J. (2005). Standards based reform and teaching for understanding. In T. Romberg, T. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Sarah, K. B., & Lance, J. R. (2000). Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Science, 24(4), 573-604. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2
- Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for science modeling: making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
- Seigel, H. (1988). Education reason: Rationality, critical thinking and education. London: Routledge.
- Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2005). The difficult process of scientific modelling: An analysis of novices' reasoning during computer-based modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1695-1721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500206408
- Suckling, C. J., Suckling, K. E., & Suckling, C. W. (1978). Chemistry through models. Concepts and applications of modeling in chemical science, technology and industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Windschitl M., Thompson J., & Braaten M., (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-Based Inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
- Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018
피인용 문헌
- Investigating the Cognitive Process of a Student's Modeling on a Modeling-Emphasized Argument-Based General Chemistry Experiment vol.35, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0313
- Impact of Peer Assessment Activities on High School Student's Argumentation in Argument-Based Inquiry vol.35, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0353
- Narrative Characteristics in High School Students' Geological Field Trip Reports: the Relationship Between the Narrative Mode of Thought and the Academic Achievement vol.35, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0735
- Analysis of Changes in Preservice Science Teachers’ Modeling Ability in Argument-based General Chemistry Laboratory Investigations vol.60, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.4.276
- Analysis of Activities in Chemistry Chapters of Middle School Science Textbooks for the 2009 Revised Science Curriculum: Focus on 8 Science Practices vol.60, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.6.436
- A Study of Preliminary Biology Teachers’Scientific Inquiry Skills and LogicalThinking Ability through the Activity of Science Writing vol.44, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.1.114
- 물질의 입자성에 대한 모형 구성 과정에서 나타나는 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론의 특징 vol.36, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0361
- 과학교육에서 모델 및 모델링에 대한 고찰 -메타모델링 지식을 중심으로- vol.37, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0239
- 과학적 모형의 사회적 구성에서 스마트기기의 역할 모색 vol.37, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.5.813
- 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 제시된 중학교 1학년 성취기준과 과학 1 교과서에 포함된 활동과 평가 문항 분석: 과학과 핵심역량 중심으로 vol.63, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2019.63.3.196