대한교통학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Transportation)

  • 제32권4호
  • /
  • Pages.357-368
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-1366(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-4217(eISSN)
대한교통학회 (Korean Society of Transportation)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

세수 재순환과 토지이용-교통모형을 이용한 혼잡통행료 분석방법론

Analysis of Congestion Tolls Using the Land Use-Transportation Model When Toll Revenues Are Recycled

  • 이혁주 (서울과학기술대학교 행정학과)
  • Rhee, Hyok-Joo (Department of Public Administration, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2013.04.05
  • 심사 : 2014.05.01
  • 발행 : 2014.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

지금까지 토지이용-교통모형은 전적으로 수치해석적 분석도구로만 이용되어 왔는데, 최근 이론개발 노력의 결과 정책변수에 대한 후생함수의 1계 도함수 간편식을 구할 수 있게 되었다. 본 논문은 혼잡통행료가 소득세 경감을 통해 재순환될 때 혼잡통행료의 변화에 대한 후생함수의 도함수를 어떻게 유도할 수 있는지 보여준다. 분석결과 혼잡통행료의 부과가 가져오는 후생변화분을 (1)혼잡의 완화로 인한 후생증가분과 (2)노동공급과의 상호작용에서 발생하는 후생손실로 분해할 수 있다. 이 결과는 기존의 연구결과와 일치한다.

So far, land use-transportation models have been used exclusively for numerical analysis. A recent theoretical endeavor now enables us to derive the first-order derivative of the model's welfare function with respect to policy variables. I extend this methodology into the institutional setting where toll revenues are recycled through labor income tax. In this setting, the first-order derivative is composed of (1) the increase in welfare due to reduced congestion, and (2) the decrease in welfare due to interaction with the existing labor income tax. This result coincides with existing theory in the non-spatial model.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anas A., Kim I.-K (1996), General Equilibrium Models of Polycentric Urban Land Use with Endogenoius Congestion and Job Agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics, 40(2), 232-256. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.0031
  2. Bovenberg A. L., De Mooij R. A., (1994), Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation, American Economic Review, 94, 1085-1089.
  3. Browning E. K., (1987), On the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation, American Economic Review, 77: 11-23.
  4. Calthrop E., De Borger B., Proost S. (2007), Externalities and Partial Tax Reform: Does It Make Sense to Tax Road Freight (But Not Passenger) Transport?, Journal of Regional Science, 47(4), 721-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00520.x
  5. De Borger B., Wuyts B. (2009), Commuting, Transport Tax Reform and the Labour Market: Employer-paid Parking and the Relative Efficiency of Revenue Recycling Instruments, Urban Studies, 46, 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008098643
  6. Diamond P. A. (1973), Consumption Externalities and Imperfect Corrective Pricing, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(2), 526-538. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003052
  7. Dixit A. K., Stiglitz J. E. (1977), Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity, American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308.
  8. Goulder L. H., Parry I. W. H., Burtraw D. (1997), Revenue-Raising versus Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Preexisting Tax Distortions, RAND Journal of Economics, 28(4), 708-731. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555783
  9. Rhee H.-J. (2012), Welfare Function of the Theory-Based Spatial Equilibrium Models and Congestion Tolls, Journal of the Korea Planners' Association, 47(4), 183-192.
  10. Rhee H.-J. (2013), Analytical Methodology of the Spatial Equilibrium Model with Agglomeration Economies, Journal of Korea Planners Association, 48(1), 181-189.
  11. Yu S., Rhee H.-J. (2011), A Study of the Welfare of a Spatial Equilibrium Model and the Implications, Journal of Korea Planners Association, 46(4), 199-208.

피인용 문헌

  1. 혼잡통행료 징수와 대중교통 차내 혼잡수준의 관계 vol.34, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2016.34.6.510