한국통신학회논문지 (The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences)

  • 제39C권8호
  • /
  • Pages.615-625
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1226-4717(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3880(eISSN)
한국통신학회 (The Korean Institute of Commucations and Information Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국방 NC 기반 C2 시설 I3A Framework

I3A Framework of Defense Network Centric Based C2 Facilities

  • 투고 : 2014.04.29
  • 심사 : 2014.08.01
  • 발행 : 2014.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

국방부는 미래전에 대비하기 위한 국방 개혁안을 토대로 2010년 "군사시설 종합 발전계획(Mater Plan)"을 수립하였다. 이것은 합동성 및 3군 균형발전을 고려한 군사력 구조조정 및 군 자산관리를 위해 전국에 산재한 군사시설을 통폐합하기 위한 계획이었다. 그러나 현용 국방 군사 시설기준을 적용하여 "군사시설 종합 발전계획"을 추진하기 위해서는 시설 기준의 부재 및 비합리적인 시설규모 산정 사례 발생으로 제 개정의 필요성이 대두 되었다. 미래 전장 환경은 플랫폼(Plat form)기반에서 네트워크 중심전(Network Centric Warfare) 기반으로 변화하면서 C4I(Command, Control, Communication, Computer & Intelligence) 체계를 이용한 지휘 통제 능력이 더욱 요구되고 있다. 그러므로 국방 정보기술(IT)과 시설이 잘 융합되어야 성공적인 임무수행을 보장할 수 있을 것이다. 따라서 국방부도 시설 통폐합에 따른 지휘통제 시설의 정보통신기반과 설비의 구축을 네트워크 중심전 수행에 맞는 정책, 설계 기준 및 운용 지침을 시급히 갖추어야 할 것이다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 문제점을 해결하기 위해 국방 I3A Framework를 제안한다.

Ministry of National Defense, MND, established a "Master Plan of Military Facility" in 2010 based on the defense reform to prepare for future war. It was a plan for consolidating small military facilities into battalion units, reflecting on and preparing for the needs of various changes in defense environment as well as balanced growth of ROK Army, Navy, and Air Force. However, to move forward with "Military Facility Master Plan," current design criteria for military facilities need to be revised to be enacted due to numerous calculation errors in facility footprints because of the absence of a sound facility criteria. Because the future war environment will be changed from Platform basis to Network Centric Warfare basis, Command & Control capability of C4I systems is getting more important. Therefore, Successful mission accomplishment can be secured by convergence of facility and military Information Technology(IT). So, MND should quickly prepare for the operational guidance, design criteria and policy that are suitable for Network Centric Warfare accomplishment, and implement infrastructure of IT and installation of C2 facility in conjunction with consolidation movement of military facilities. In this paper, we propose the defense I3A framework in order to solve this problem.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Implementation Engineering Subject Matter Expert, "Technical Criteria for the Installation Information Infrastructure Architecture(I3A)," US Army Information System Engineering Command(USAISEC) Technology Integration Center, pp. 1-112, Oct. 2013.
  2. MND(Ministry of National Defense), "Defense․ military facilities criteria of information communication installation," MND Defense.Military Facilities Criteria, pp. 1-123, Jul. 2013.
  3. MND, "A study for an enact & revision of defense․military facilities criteria and work guidance," Defense․Military Facilities Criteria, pp. 7-12, 2012.
  4. Department of the Army facilities Standardization Program, "Command & control facilities and others army headquarters, 3.9 communication and security system," US Army Corp of Engineers UFC 4-140-03 Standard Design, pp. 21-27, Jul. 2012.
  5. National Counterintelligence Executive, "Technical specification for construction management of sensitive compartmented information facilities," US DoD Deputy for Security, Version 1, pp. 72-76, May 2011.
  6. USACE, "UFC 1-300-09N design procedure," US Army Corp of Engineers UFC, pp. 63-70, Feb. 2011.
  7. Technical Implementation Group, "SIPRNET technical implementation criteria final_Ver6," USAISEC, Distribution C, pp. 45-87, Oct. 2010.
  8. H. K. Yang, H. J. Cha, and Y. G. Cho, "A study on the reform of a defence IT governance system," J. KICS, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 777-784, May 2010.
  9. Technical Implementation Group, "US army installation & campus area network design guide," USAISEC Technology Integration Center, pp. 3-10, Mar. 2010.
  10. H. S. Chun, "A study on convergence service between construction and information technology," in Proc. KICS, vol. 2009, no. 6, pp. 422-425, Jun. 2009.
  11. D. Ryu, J. I. Si, Y. H. Kim, and Y. R. Lee, "A study on framework according to IT Infra construction step-by-step for u-City Service revitalization," in Proc. KICS, vol. 2009, no. 6, pp. 814-816, Jun. 2009.
  12. Headquarters Department of the Army, "Army regulation 500-3, U.S. army continuity of operations program policy and planning (COOP)," US Army COOP Policy Headquarter, pp. 45-87, Apr. 2008.
  13. J. Lee and T. Lee, "Study on the capability driven EA framework enterprise transformation," J. Informatization Policy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 96-117, 2008.
  14. T. G. Lee, NCW theory and application, Hongrung publishing Company, pp. 519-549, 2007.
  15. Deputy of DoD, "DIACAP(DoD information assurance certification and accreditation process)," DoD Directive 8510.01 Deputy DoD, pp. 2-13, 2007.
  16. J. G. Lee and T. G. Lee, "Introduction of defense information integration model based on EA for NCW," KIDA. Defense Policy Research, Winter, pp. 12-13, 2006.
  17. J. A. Zachman, "The zachman framework for enterprise architecture," Zachman International, pp. 4-8, 2003.