한국전산구조공학회논문집 (Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea)

  • 제27권4호
  • /
  • Pages.215-222
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-3059(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-2302(eISSN)
한국전산구조공학회 (Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다양한 높이를 가진 철골 중간모멘트골조의 내진성능평가

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Steel Intermediate Moment Frames with Different Heights

  • Kim, Dong Hwi (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang Univ.) ;
  • Park, Yu Jin (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang Univ.) ;
  • Han, Sang Whan (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2014.07.02
  • 심사 : 2014.08.03
  • 발행 : 2014.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 다양한 높이에 따른 철골 중간모멘트골조의 내진성능을 평가하는 것이다. 구조물의 내진성능은 ATC-63에서 제안한 방법론에 따라 평가되었다. 3층, 6층, 9층, 12층 중간모멘트골조의 설계는 KBC 2009에 따라 수행하였다. 접합부의 모델링은 철골 중간모멘트골조에서 요구되는 회전성능인 0.02rad을 만족하도록 모델링하였다. 연구를 수행한 결과, 구조물의 붕괴확률은 높이가 증가함에 따라 증가하였다. 특히 9층과 12층 구조물은 ATC-63에서 제시한 요구조건을 만족하지 못하였다.

The objective of this research is to evaluate the seismic performance of steel intermediate moment frames(IMFs) with different heights. The seimic performance is conducted according to ATC-63. Three-, six, nine- and twelve-story IMFs are designed according to KBC 2009. The connection is modeled to have a drift capacity of 0.02rad, which is required for IMF connections. This study shows that the probability of collapse increases with an increase in the height of the frame. Nine- and twelve-story frames did not satisfy the requirement specified in ATC-63.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AISC (2010) Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings Including Suppliment No.1 (ANSI/AISC 341-10), American Institute of Steel Construction Inc. (AISC), Chicago, IL.
  2. Architectural Institute of Korea (2009) Korea Building Code and Commentary, Architectural Institute of Korea.
  3. ASCE (2010) Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.
  4. ATC (2005) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, ATC-63, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
  5. FEMA (2000) Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabitation of Buildings, FEMA 356, Washington, D.C.
  6. Gupta, A., Krawinkler, H. (1999) Seismic Demands for Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures(SAC Task 5.4.3), John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Rep. No.132, Dept. Civil Engrg., Stanford University.
  7. Ibarra, L.F. (2005) Global Collapse of Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Rep. No.132, Dept. Civil Engrg., Stanford University.
  8. Lee, K.H., Foutch, D.A. (2002) Performance Evaluation of New Steel Frame Buildings for Seismic Loads, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, pp.653-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.147
  9. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., Fenves, G.L. (2007) Opensees Command Language Manual, The University of California, Befkeley, Calif. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/indez.php.
  10. Vamvatsikos, D., Cornell, C.A. (2002) Seismic Performance, Capacity and Reliability of Structures as Seen Through Incremental Dynamic Analysis, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Rep. No. 151 Stanford University.
  11. Yun, S.Y., Foutch, D.A. (2000) Performance Prediction and Evaluation of Low Ductility Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Loads, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Dept. Civil Engrg., Stanford University.
  12. Yun, S.Y., Hamburger, R.O., Cornell, C.A., Foutch, D.A. (2002) Seismic Performance Evaluation for Steel Moment Frames, Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, pp.534-545. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(534)