Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2014.27.4.215

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Steel Intermediate Moment Frames with Different Heights  

Kim, Dong Hwi (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang Univ.)
Park, Yu Jin (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang Univ.)
Han, Sang Whan (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang Univ.)
Publication Information
Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea / v.27, no.4, 2014 , pp. 215-222 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of this research is to evaluate the seismic performance of steel intermediate moment frames(IMFs) with different heights. The seimic performance is conducted according to ATC-63. Three-, six, nine- and twelve-story IMFs are designed according to KBC 2009. The connection is modeled to have a drift capacity of 0.02rad, which is required for IMF connections. This study shows that the probability of collapse increases with an increase in the height of the frame. Nine- and twelve-story frames did not satisfy the requirement specified in ATC-63.
Keywords
steel intermediate moment frame; seismic performance; probability of collapse;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Vamvatsikos, D., Cornell, C.A. (2002) Seismic Performance, Capacity and Reliability of Structures as Seen Through Incremental Dynamic Analysis, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Rep. No. 151 Stanford University.
2 Yun, S.Y., Foutch, D.A. (2000) Performance Prediction and Evaluation of Low Ductility Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Loads, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Dept. Civil Engrg., Stanford University.
3 Yun, S.Y., Hamburger, R.O., Cornell, C.A., Foutch, D.A. (2002) Seismic Performance Evaluation for Steel Moment Frames, Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, pp.534-545.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 AISC (2010) Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings Including Suppliment No.1 (ANSI/AISC 341-10), American Institute of Steel Construction Inc. (AISC), Chicago, IL.
5 ASCE (2010) Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.
6 ATC (2005) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, ATC-63, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
7 FEMA (2000) Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabitation of Buildings, FEMA 356, Washington, D.C.
8 Gupta, A., Krawinkler, H. (1999) Seismic Demands for Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures(SAC Task 5.4.3), John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Rep. No.132, Dept. Civil Engrg., Stanford University.
9 Ibarra, L.F. (2005) Global Collapse of Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Rep. No.132, Dept. Civil Engrg., Stanford University.
10 Lee, K.H., Foutch, D.A. (2002) Performance Evaluation of New Steel Frame Buildings for Seismic Loads, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, pp.653-670.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., Fenves, G.L. (2007) Opensees Command Language Manual, The University of California, Befkeley, Calif. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/indez.php.
12 Architectural Institute of Korea (2009) Korea Building Code and Commentary, Architectural Institute of Korea.