East Asian mathematical journal

The Youngnam Mathematical Society (영남수학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The study of Complex structure in phenomenon of Mathematics Education

수학교육 현상의 융합적 구조에 대한 소론

  • Received : 2014.07.11
  • Accepted : 2014.08.19
  • Published : 2014.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the history of mathematics education, different opinions as to how to view the phenomenon of mathematics education have been suggested in various ways. As those conflicting opinions have caused fundamental tensions in the phenomenon of mathematics education, they remain fundamental standpoints that have been continuously advocated until now - not limited in a certain period. It can be argued that this situation was caused by partial or fragmentary understanding of the phenomenon of mathematics education. If we are pursuing not a partial knowledge but a complete understanding of mathematics education, how should it be formed to comprehensively study the entire phenomenon of mathematics education? To answer this question, Complex structure in phenomenon of Mathematics Education can be proposed. It is an explanation for the opposing opinions existing in the phenomenon of mathematics education. The purpose of this paper is to understand the phenomenon of mathematics education as a whole.

Keywords

References

  1. 김응태, 박한식, 우정호, 수학교육학개론, 서울대학교출판부, 1984.
  2. 김창환, 헤르바르트: 실천으로서의 교육학, 서울: 문음사, 2002.
  3. 우정호, 수학 학습-지도 원리와 방법, SNU-PRESS, 2010.
  4. 한대희, 인간교육으로서의 수학교육, 서울대학교대학원 박사학위논문. 2000.
  5. Boyd, William, The History of Western education, 1964, (李烘雨, 朴在文, 柳漢九共譯, 西洋敎育史, 敎育科學社, 1983.)
  6. Cajori, F, A history of elementary mathematics with hints on methods of teaching(2nd ed.), New York: Macmillan Company, 1919.
  7. Carl, P, Kants philosophy of mathematics : modern essays, edited Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
  8. Ernest, P. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education, London: Washington D.C., The Falmer Press, 1991.
  9. Eves, H. Foundations and fundamental concepts of mathematics, New York Macmillan Company, 1978.
  10. Higginson, W. On the foundations of mathematics education, For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(2), (1980). 3-7,
  11. Freudenthal, H. Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1, (1968), 3-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426224
  12. Jacobs, H. R. Mathematics, A Human Endeavor : A Textbook for Those Who Think They don't Like the Subject. Freeman and Company, 1970.
  13. Kant, I. Critique of pure reason, translated by P. Guyer, The Cambridge Edition of the works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge, 1998.
  14. Keith, D. Mathematics, the science of patterns : the search for order in life, mind, and the universe, New York: Henry and Holt Company 1983.
  15. Piaget, J. Psychology and epistemology: towards a theory of knowledge. A. Denoel, Rosin, (Trans.). New York: Penguin Books, 1977.
  16. Wittman, E. C. Mathematics education as a design science, Educational Studies in mathematics 29(1995), 355-374, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273911