DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the Exopeptidase Activity of Fractions from Crude Extracts of Octopus Octopus vulgaris Cuvier Hepatopancreas Using Different Fractionation Methods

  • Kim, Min Ji (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon Jeong (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Ki Hyun (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Heu, Min Soo (Department of Food Nutrition/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Soo (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2013.12.17
  • Accepted : 2014.02.05
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

This study was performed to identify the optimum fractionation method and conditions to obtain exopeptidase-active fractions from octopus hepatopancreas (HP) crude extracts (CEs) using four techniques: solid ammonium sulfate fractionation, polyethylene glycol (PEG) fractionation, anion exchange chromatography, and gel filtration chromatography. The fractions with the highest total activity toward L-leucine-p-nitroanilide (Leu-pNA) were fraction IV from the ammonium sulfate and PEG fractionation, and fraction II in ion exchange and gel filtration chromatography. The total exoprotease activity of these fractions was highest in fraction IV (4,050.20 U) of ammonium sulfate fractionation, followed by fraction II (3,600.28 U) from gel filtration chromatography, fraction IV (2,861.30 U) from PEG fractionation, and fraction II (2,576.28 U) from ion exchange chromatography. These results suggest that ammonium sulfate fractionation using 60-80% ammonium sulfate was the most efficient method for separating the exoprotease active fractions from CEs of octopus HP.

Keywords

References

  1. Agriculture and Fishery Statistics Department. 2011. Results of the Fishery Production Survey in 2010. Statistics Korea, Seoul, KR.
  2. Bougatef A, Souissi N, Fakhfakh N, Ellouz-Triki Y and Nasri M. 2007. Purification and characterization of trypsin from the viscera of sardine (Sardina pilchardus). Food Chem 102, 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.050
  3. Bumberger E and Belitz HD. 1993. Bitter taste of enzymatic hydrolysates of casein. I. Isolation, structural and sensorial analysis of peptides from tryptic hydrolysates of beta-casein. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 197, 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202693
  4. Chiou TK, Matsui T and Konosu S. 1988. Purification and properties of an aminopeptidase from mullet, Mugil cephalus, roe. Agric Biol Chem 52, 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb1961.52.235
  5. Clegg KM, Lim CL and Manson W. 1974. The structure of a bitter peptide derived from casein by digestion with papain. J Dairy Res 41, 283-287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029900019695
  6. Dawson RMC, Elliot DC, Elliot WH and Jones KM. 1986. Data for biochemical research. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, GB, pp. 417-441.
  7. Deejing S, Yoshimune K, Lumyong S and Moriguchi M. 2005. Purification and characterization of hyperthermotolerant leucine aminopeptidase from Geobacillus thermoleovorans 47b. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32, 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-005-0236-z
  8. Ezquerra-Brauer JM, Haard NF, Ramirez-Olivas R, Olivas-Burrola H and Velazquez-Sanchez CJ. 2002. Influence of harvest season on the proteolytic activity of hepatopancreas and mantle tissues from jumbo squid (Doswicus gigas). J Food Biochem 26, 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2002.tb00766.x
  9. Garcia-Carreno FL and Haard NF. 1993. Characterization of proteinase classes in langostilla (Pleuroncodes planipes) and crayfish (Pacifastacus astacus) extracts. J Food Biochem 17, 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.1993.tb00864.x
  10. Guerard F. 2007. Enzymatic methods for marine by-products recovery. In: Maximising the Value of Marine By-products. Shahidi F, ed. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, GB, pp. 107-143.
  11. Gupta R, Beg QK, Lorenz P. 2002. Bacterial alkaline proteases: molecular approaches and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnolo 59, 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-0975-y
  12. Haard NF. 1990. Enzymes from food myosystems. J Muscle Foods 1, 293-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.1990.tb00371.x
  13. Hurtado JL, Borderias J, Montero P and An H. 1999. Characterization of proteolytic activity in octopus (Octopus vulgaris) arm muscle. J Food Biochem 23, 469-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.1999.tb00031.x
  14. Izawa N, Tokuyasu K and Hayashi K. 1997. Debittering of protein hydrolysates using Aeromonas caviae aminopeptidase. J Agric Food Chem 45, 543-545. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf960784t
  15. Kim HS, Kim JS and Heu MS. 2007. Distribution and extraction condition of endoprotease and exopeptidase from viscera of Illex argentinus. J Korean Soc Appl Biol chem 50, 308-315.
  16. Kim HS, Kim JS and Heu MS. 2008a. Fractionation of endoprotease from viscera of the Argentina shortfin squid Illex argentinus. J Korean Fish Soc 41, 176-181. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2008.41.3.176
  17. Kim HS, Kim JS and Heu MS. 2008b. Fractionation of exoprotease from viscera of the Argentina shortfin squid Illex argentinus. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37, 1009-1017. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.8.1009
  18. Kishimura H, Saeki H and Hayashi K. 2001. Isolation and characteristics of trypsin inhibitor from the hepatopancreas of a squid (Todarodes pacificus). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 130, 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00415-8
  19. Kristinsson HG and Rasco BA. 2000. Fish protein hydrolysates: production, biochemical and functional properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 40, 43-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690091189266
  20. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193, 265-275.
  21. Matoba T, Hayashi R and Hata T. 1970. Isolation of bitter peptides from tryptic hydrolysate of casein and their chemical structure. Agric Biol Chem 34, 1235-1243. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb1961.34.1235
  22. Minagawa E, Kaminogawa S, Tsukasaki F and Yamauchi K. 1989. Debittering mechanism in bitter peptides of enzymatic hydrolysates from milk casein by aminopeptidase T. J Food Sci 54, 1225-1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb05960.x
  23. Raksakulthai R and Haard NF. 1999. Purification and characterization of aminopeptidase fractions from squid (Illex illecebrosus) hepatopancreas. J Food Biochem 23, 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.1999.tb00010.x
  24. Raksakulthai R, Rosenberg M and Haard NF. 2002. Accelerated cheddar cheese ripening with an aminopeptidase fraction from squid hepatopancreas. J Food Sci 67, 923-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09429.x
  25. Rao MB, Tankasale AM, Ghatge MS and Deshpande VV. 1998. Molecular and biotechnological aspects of microbial proteases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 597-635.
  26. Sakai J and Matsumoto J. 1981. Proteolytic enzymes of squid mantle muscle. Comp Biochem Physiol 68, 389-395.
  27. Souissi N, Ellouz-Triki Y, Bougatef A, Blibech M and Nasri M. 2008. Preparation and use of media for protease-producing baterial strains based on by-products from cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and wastewaters from marine-products processing factories. Microbiol Res 163, 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.07.013
  28. Starky P. M. 1977. Elastase and cathepsin G: the serine protease of human neutrophil leukocytes and spleen. In: Proteinases in Mammalian Cells and Tissues. Barrett AJ, ed. Elsevier Science Ltd/North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, NL, pp. 57-89.
  29. Umetsu H and Ichishima E. 1988. Mechanism of digestion of bitter peptides from soybean protein by wheat carboxypeptidase. J Jpn Soc Food Sci Technol 35, 440-447. https://doi.org/10.3136/nskkk1962.35.440