한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제34권3호
  • /
  • Pages.273-283
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고등학교 생명과학 수업의 진단평가 및 형성평가에서 교실응답시스템의 활용 효과

Practical Use of the Classroom Response System (CRS) for Diagnostic and Formative Assessments in a High School Life Science Class

  • 투고 : 2014.03.28
  • 심사 : 2014.05.20
  • 발행 : 2014.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 문제풀이 중심으로 운영되는 고등학교 생명과학 수업에서 교육매체의 일종인 교실응답시스템(CRS)의 활용 가능성을 알아보고자 하였다. 교수 학습 전략으로 CRS 활용반(34명)은 학생들이 CRS단말기로 응답한 결과를 교사가 즉시 파악하고 개인별 응답 이유를 질문한 후 피드백을 하였다. 비교반(35명)에서는 CRS를 사용하지 않았으며 학생들에게 일괄적인 피드백을 하였다. 연구 결과, CRS 활용이 학생들로 하여금 수업 활동에 흥미와 집중력을 높여주는 것으로 인식되었다. 그러나 학업 성취도의 향상에 있어서 CRS 활용반과 비교반 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 다만 성적 수준에 따라 그룹을 나누었을 때, 중위그룹에서는 CRS 활용반과 비교반 사이에 학업 성취도의 향상에 유의한 차이를 보였다. 진단평가 및 형성평가에서 CRS 활용의 효과를 높이기 위해서는 다양한 수준의 문제들을 사전에 개발하고, 학생들의 응답 이유를 정확히 파악하여 더욱 많은 학생들에게 개인별 맞춤형 피드백을 할 수 있는 교수 전략의 개발이 필요함을 제안한다.

The purpose of this study was to examine the potential of the use of the Classroom Response System (CRS), a kind of new ICT medium, in a quiz problem-solving oriented high school life science class. To find the usefulness of CRS as a teaching and learning strategy, the CRS group (n=34) sent prompt individual answers to the teachers' questions using the CRS terminal (Clicker), and the teacher then asked additional reasons of the individuals and gave personalized feedback. In the control group (n=35), the CRS was not used while the teacher asked overall questions and gave feedback in an undifferentiated way. As a result, the CRS increased students' interest and concentration during class, but there were no significant differences in study achievement between the two groups. However, there were significant differences between the medium-level groups when the two groups were divided into smaller ones based on their pre-scores. We suggest that, for effective use of the CRS for diagnostic and formative assessment, teachers should develop a teaching and learning strategy that can produce appropriate questions of various levels in advance, investigate the exact reasons for students' answers, and give customized feedback by individual as much as possible.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Addison, S., Wright, A., & Milner, R. (2009). Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20264
  2. Anderson, L. S., Healy, A. F., Kole, J. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2011). Conserving time in the classroom: The clicker technique. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology in the Schools, 64(8), 1457-1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.593264
  3. Bartsch, R. A., & Murphy, W. (2011). Examining the effects of an electronic classroom response system on student engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.1.b
  4. Beatty, I. D., Feldman, A., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., & Lee, H. (2008). Teacher learning of technology-enhanced formative assessment. Annual Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore.
  5. Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Science Education, 6(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
  6. Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-482. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438
  7. Crouch, A. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
  8. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Leonard, W. J. (2000). ASK-IT/A2L: Assessing student knowledge with instructional technology (Tech. Rep Dufresne 2000 ask). University of Massachusetts Amherst Scientific Reasoning Research Institute.
  9. Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0360-1
  10. FitzPatrick, K. A., Finn, K. E., & Campisi, J. (2011). Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(3), 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00036.2011
  11. Gim, W. H., Seo, J-H., & Kim, Y-J. (2011). A study on the use of ICT in middle school science class. Educational Research, 51, 171-194.
  12. Jeong, H-H. (2009). A qualitative study on the use of ICT in elementary school. The Journal of Korean Education, 36(4), 69-97.
  13. Jung, J., & Jeon, D. (2008). The effect of using a remote answering machine in high school physics class. School Science Journal, 2(2), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.15737/ssj.2.2.200808.95
  14. Kim, H-S., & Kim, J-R. (2010). Effects of student participation performance assessment using a remote responder on students' academic achievement. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 14(3), 461-468.
  15. Kim, J. G. (2010). Inquiry of formative assessment: 50 story. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  16. Kim, J. G. (2008). The story of formative assessment by professor Kim. Seoul: KangHyun Publisher.
  17. Kim, Y-A., Seo, J-H., Kye, B-K., & Lee, E. H. (2011). Study of educational using plan for new trendy ICT. (Research report CR2011-55-4). Korean Educational Development Institute.Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  18. King, D. B. (2011). Using clickers to identify the muddiest points in large chemistry classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(11), 1485-1488. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1004799
  19. Langman, J., & Fies, C. (2010). Classroom response system-mediated science learning with English language learners. Language & Education: An International Journal, 24(2), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780903096553
  20. Larry, J. B. (2008). Lecture-free high school biology using an audience response system. The American Biology Teacher, 70(9), 531-536. https://doi.org/10.2307/27669338
  21. Lee, H., Choi, K., & Nam, J. H. (2000). The effects of formative assessment with detailed feedback on students' science achievement, attitude, and interaction between teacher and students. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 479-490.
  22. Lee, J., Gu, Y. M., Shin, K. J., Kim, D. I., Gye, B-K., & Jeong, S. W. (2012). Developmental study of SMART education running program creative problem solving. (RM 2012-30) Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  23. MacArthur, J., L., Jones, L., & Suits, J. (2011). Faculty viewpoints on teaching large-enrollment science courses with clickers. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(3), 251-270.
  24. Metz, A. M. (2008). The effect of access time on online quiz performance in large biology lecture courses. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36, 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20184
  25. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development (2008). Educational information white paper in the year of 2008. Seoul: Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  26. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). Strategy for driving SMART education. The report of strategy committee for national information (2011. 6. 29.).
  27. Oh, J. (2013). Perception and effects of classroom response system use. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 435-458.
  28. Park, J. Y., Nam, J. H., & Yoo, H. S. (2000). The effects of a teaching strategy based on the interactive formative assessment in middle school science class. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 468-478.
  29. Poirier, C. R., & Feldman, R. S. (2007). Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 34(3), 194-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701498665
  30. Ryu, G. H., Kim, H., & Yoon, E. J. (2011). Tapper-interactive lecture system design for intelligent campus environment. Workshop presentation file in Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, 38(2A), 63-66.
  31. Shaffer, D. M., & Collura, M. J. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 273-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280903175749
  32. Shim, K-C., Yeau, S-H., Kim, Y-J., Hwang, U. W., Ahn, P. H., & Lee, I. G. (2011). High school life science I (textbook). Seoul: Visang education.
  33. Strasser, N. (2010). Who wants to pass math? Using clickers in calculus. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(3), 49-52.
  34. Towns, M. H. (2010). Crossing the chasm with classroom response systems. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1317-1319. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed9000624
  35. Uhari, M., Renko, M., & Soini, H. (2003). Experience of using an interactive audience response system in lecture. BMC Medical Education, 3, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-3-12
  36. Walgren, J. (2011). Innovative use of a classroom response system during physics lab. The Physics Teacher, 49(1), 30-32. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3527752
  37. Weerts, S. E., Miller, D., & Altice, A. (2009). "Clicker" technology promotes interactivity in an undergraduate nutrition course. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior, 41(3), 227-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2008.08.006
  38. Wit, E. (2003). Who wants to be... The use of personal response system in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections, 3(2), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2003.03020014

피인용 문헌

  1. The Effects of Individualized Learning Adapted to Students' Conceptions Using Smart Devices in Science Instruction vol.35, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0325
  2. Effects of Diagnostic and Formative Assessment Using Equivalent Test on Elementary Science Classes : Focused on the 'Earth and Moon' Unit vol.35, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0619
  3. The Effects of an Instruction Using Geologic Planar Figures on High School Students’ Ability of Spatial Visualization and Geologic Spatial Ability vol.36, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2015.36.3.280
  4. A Study on Education of Communication Using Web-based Teaching Assistive Tools vol.10, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.19042/kstc.2017.10.1.51
  5. A Study on Education of Communication Using Web-based Teaching Assistive Tools vol.10, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.19042/kstc.2017.10.1.81
  6. 제4차 산업 시대의 스마트 환경을 활용한 의사소통교육 모델 연구 vol.20, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2017.20.3.32
  7. 과학과 미디어 기반 학습 관련 문헌 연구 vol.37, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.417
  8. 과학적 의사소통 능력 향상을 위한 과정중심평가 개발 및 적용 vol.38, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.1.16
  9. 대학 수업에서 스마트 LMS의 상호작용 효과 vol.17, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2019.17.3.395