Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments

  • Received : 2013.08.25
  • Accepted : 2013.11.22
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Extensively destroyed teeth are commonly restored with composite resin before cavity preparation for indirect restorations. The longevity of the restoration can be related to the proper bonding of the resin cement to the composite. This study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to composite resin. Material and Methods: Composite discs were subject to one of six different surface pretreatments: none (control), 35% phosphoric acid etching for 30 seconds (PA), application of silane (silane), PA + silane, PA + adhesive, or PA + silane + adhesive (n = 6). A silicone mold containing a cylindrical orifice ($1mm^2$ diameter) was placed over the composite resin. RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) or BisCem (Bisco Inc.) self-adhesive resin cement was inserted into the orifices and light-cured. Self-adhesive cement cylinders were submitted to shear loading. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: Independent of the cement used, the PA + Silane + Adhesive group showed higher microshear bond strength than those of the PA and PA + Silane groups. There was no difference among the other treatments. Unicem presented higher bond strength than BisCem for all experimental conditions. Conclusions: Pretreatments of the composite resin surface might have an effect on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to this substrate.

Keywords

References

  1. Tsitrou EA, van Noort R. Minimal preparation designs for single posterior indirect prostheses with the use of the Cerec system. Int J Comput Dent 2008;11:227-240.
  2. Dietschi D, Argente A. A comprehensive and conservative approach for the restoration of abrasion and erosion. part II: clinical procedures and case report. Eur J Esthet Dent 2011;6:142-159.
  3. Takahashi R, Nikaido T, Ariyoshi M, Kitayama S, Sadr A, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Thin resin coating by dualapplication of all-in-one adhesives improves dentin bond strength of resin cements for indirect restorations. Dent Mater J 2010;29:615-622. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-110
  4. Unlu N, Gunal S, Ulker M, Ozer F, Blatz MB. Influence of operator experience on in vitro bond strength of dentin adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:223-227.
  5. Gomes GM, Gomes OM, Reis A, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Calixto AL. Effect of operator experience on the outcome of fiber post cementation with different resin cements. Oper Dent 2013;38:555-564. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-494-L
  6. Pfeifer C, Shih D, Braga RR. Compatibility of dental adhesives and dual-cure cements. Am J Dent 2003;16: 235-238.
  7. Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Hoffmann M, Komatsu M. Compatibility between an all-in-one self-etching adhesive and a dual-cured resin luting cement. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:229-232.
  8. Broyles AC, Pavan S, Bedran-Russo AK. Effect of dentin surface modification on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthodont 2013;22:59-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00890.x
  9. Stona P, Borges GA, Montes MA, Júnior LH, Weber JB, Spohr AM. Effect of polyacrylic acid on the interface and bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:221-227.
  10. Lisboa DS, Santos SV, Griza S, Rodrigues JL, Fariae- Silva AL. Dentin deproteinization effect on bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. Braz Oral Res 2013;27:73-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013000100013
  11. Faria-e-Silva AL, Menezes Mde S, Silva FP, Reis GR, Moraes RR. Intra-radicular dentin treatments and retention of fiber posts with self-adhesive resin cements. Braz Oral Res 2013;27:14-19. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013000100003
  12. Soares LP, Dias KR, de Vasconcellos AB, Sampaio EM, Street A. Effects of different pretreatments on the bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to various fiber-reinforced composite posts. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012;20:41-47.
  13. Melo MA, Moysés MR, Santos SG, Alcântara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Braz Oral Res 2011;25:485-491. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000600003
  14. Moncada G, Angel P, Fernandez E, Alonso P, Martin J, Gordan VV. Bond strength evaluation of nanohybrid resin-based composite repair. Gen Dent 2012;60:230-234.
  15. Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, Attin T. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:35-40.
  16. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 2008;36:969-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.014
  17. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites-a comparative study. Dent Mater 2006;22:934-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.004
  18. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements-chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:295-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x
  19. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res 2008;87:974-979. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701012
  20. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater 2007;23:829-839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.023
  21. Zorzin J, Petschelt A, Ebert J, Lohbauer U. pH neutralization and influence on mechanical strength in selfadhesive resin luting agents. Dent Mater 2012;28:672-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.005
  22. Madruga FC, Ogliari FA, Ramos TS, Bueno M, Moraes RR. Calcium hydroxide, pH-neutralization and formulation of model self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2013; 29:413-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.004
  23. Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Hiraishi N, Kitasako Y, Tagami J, Nomura S, Miura H. Relationship between ceramic primer and ceramic surface pH on the bonding of dualcure resin cement to ceramic. Dent Mater 2003;19:779-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00026-5
  24. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 155-164.
  25. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater 2011;27:701-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.013
  26. Blatz MB, Phark JH, Ozer F, Mante FK, Saleh N, Bergler M, Sadan A. In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:187-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0278-0

Cited by

  1. Effect of Plasma Deposition Using Low-Power/Non-thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma on Promoting Adhesion of Composite Resin to Enamel vol.34, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-014-9553-1
  2. Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments vol.37, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21183
  3. Effects of air abrasion with alumina or glass beads on surface characteristics of CAD/CAM composite materials and the bond strength of resin cements vol.23, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150261
  4. Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic vol.35, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-271
  5. Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement vol.9, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.439
  6. Orthodontic bracket bonding to glazed full-contour zirconia vol.41, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.106
  7. Effects of different etching methods and bonding procedures on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM ceramic materials vol.88, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2319/070917-455.1
  8. Effect of Silanization on Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements to a Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1818
  9. Ceramic repairs with resins: silanization protocols vol.9, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00425
  10. Adhesive Systems Used in Indirect Restorations Cementation: Review of the Literature vol.7, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030071
  11. Effect of various polymerization protocols on the cytotoxicity of conventional and self-adhesive resin-based luting cements vol.24, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02980-3